12/11/09 Dakar, Senegal – We’re not really in Dakar. We left there after a couple of hours on the runway. But we thought it would fun to file a Daily Reckoning from such an exotic place.
Now, we’re back in good ol’ Bawlamer, Maryland. No matter where you go in the world, you won’t find anything like Baltimore. It’s probably best that way.
This week, we’ve had our eye on gold…and the dollar. As the dollar rises, gold goes down. This is not the way we thought it would happen. We expected a crack in the stock market first.
But you never know. And we’ll take what we can get. Gold is correcting; that’s what we were waiting for.
Well, we don’t really know what is happening. Stocks rose yesterday – with the Dow up 68 points. So far, no sign of the rout we’re expecting. We’ll leave our tattered Crash Alert Flag flying anyway…just in case.
Gold rose $5 yesterday. Was that all there was to it? Was that the dip you’re supposed to buy?
We wish we could tell you. As far as we call tell, this is the part of the market that is “noise” and not much more. Gold is a very good bet for the long term. Because it is a bet against Bernanke & Co. Look at it this way, where would your rather put your money…on the brains and integrity of America’s central bankers…or on a dumb metal? We’ll take the metal!
Just look at what the Bernanke team does. Listen to what they say. They have no idea what they are doing…yet, they are doing a lot of it. They more than doubled the US monetary base in less than 18 months. They’ve bought hundreds of billions worth of the banks’ dodgy loans. They’ve threatened to drop money from helicopters rather than permit the economy to correct its mistakes.
We’ll take gold, thank you very much…and wait to see what happens next.
Markets are closer to living things than to inanimate objects. They have hearts, souls, and a sense of humor. They don’t merely react to circumstances. They create circumstances. And then they react to them. And then they give a good laugh. That’s why Modern Portfolio Theory and the Efficient Market Hypothesis are such folderol. They expect markets to act like rubber balls or iron filings. They expect them to behave like objects, rather than like human beings.
Anthropogenic Global Warming is probably a hollow conceit. Anthropogenic Market Warming, on the other hand, is a certainty. Put out enough hot money…mix with boundless delusions…and that is what you get.
Anthropogenic Global Warming, or AGW, is what climate scientists call the hypothesis that human behavior is causing the world to heat up. Anthropogenic means ‘caused by humans.’ Supposedly, humans release carbon dioxide that creates a greenhouse effect, raising temperatures. That’s what the scientists claim.
The trouble is there aren’t really any climate scientists and nobody really knows what is going on. Real science requires an ability to reproduce results and disprove an assertion. If there’s no way to prove that a hypothesis isn’t so, it’s not really science. It’s just guesswork. Nobody can prove much of anything related to the earth’s climate. You can’t do a controlled experiment. All you have is cogitation and conjecture.
Markets are the same way. Nobody knows for sure why anything happens. But we do know that humans play a central role in market behavior and that what they think matters. That’s why you can’t measure risk by looking back on past behavior. Investors didn’t think the same things then.
In the ’90s, investors began to believe that stocks always outperformed bonds and that the US stock market was the safest, surest bet on the planet. This gave them an almost unlimited faith in Wall Street, in equities and in the future. Stocks soared. Then, what happened? In the next decade, US stocks underperformed bonds and were the world’s worst-performing major equity market.
Now that’s a sense of humor!
And now what do investors believe? They think we are in a recovery. They don’t expect it to be very robust. They may be mad at the authorities for giving so much money to the bankers, but they have confidence that the situation is under control. US bonds are still the world’s best credits, in their eyes. And stocks are still almost as good as money in the bank. Sure, they may take a hit…but they always bounce back.
The bear has his work cut out for him. He must demolish these confident, inherently bullish, attitudes. He gave investors a fright in ’08-’09. As near as we can tell, he succeeded in chasing consumers out of the park. With no source of finance or increased income, consumers have been forced to cut back. They have no choice. Fashion often follows necessity; conspicuous consumption is giving way to frugality.
But investors – particularly speculators – are still believers. The feds couldn’t juice up consumer spending…but they wasted no time putting the asset markets into the blender. Speculators enjoy real short-term lending rates below zero…and the fruit of TARP. And now comes word that the feds are going to extend TARP until October 2010…and use unspent funds in other stimulating ways.
No wonder the markets are so frothy! Just watch. Mr. Bear is going to blow the froth off. That’s his job.
Sign Up for The Daily Reckoning e-letter and receive a copy of Bill Bonner's The Trade of The Decade report… at NO CHARGE.
We Value Your Privacy.
ShareThis
If you can’t beat them join them. Well what happens if you can’t beat them or join them? Only option I see is bet against them and their egos while hoping for a reality check.
How can a smart guy like you be a global-warming-denier!?
Just call him not-Al.
Get out the thumbscrews!
He’s not denying, he’s saying you cannot prove one side or the other…. nor can you, nor I, nor can anyone prove one way or the other.
Thank you for a new word for my vocabulary: “Anthropogenic.”
And, there is global warming the description, and global warming the doctrine. Global warming the doctrine states that man has caused the earth’s temperature to rise (and therefore a handy excuse for government to tax and control individuals).
I agree: Global warming the doctrine is poor science. Why do scientists forget simple history: When the dinosaurs lived the tropics were everywhere (it’s in the rocks). It was much hotter then, and more humid.
Did human beings cause this back then? NOT!
In My Opinion: A Form of AGW [Global Warming]IS correct. The Internal Combustion Engine IS A HEAT ENGINE! 78% of the fuel burned is converted to Heat, warming the Air of the Globe. The Earth seems to [Should be] entering another Ice Age; but, with the millions of heat motors running every day…we are delaying that. Maybe for the good/maybe not [for Humans] ALL of these people running around pretending to be “Knowlegable” must have their own “fish to fry”. [I think that Most of them are Not very high on the “IQ” scale; but, They Do have big mouths/loud voices.
Global warming is that buzzword that I keep hearing by the ‘chicken-littles’ running in circles & saying ‘we have to act right away.’ No matter that they have NO IDEA of what to actually DO. And please, refer to this event properly: as some areas indeed do warm others are cooling–the proper term is climate change, and that’s what this planet has been doing since day one. Are we hastening it? Very possibly.