It’s not easy being a mainstream economist. You spend your life building models that become your professional identity. And when those models fail to describe and predict reality, you’re left wondering about the meaning of it all.
The latest case in point is US housing. Keynesian economic models say that if you lower mortgage rates you get more houses bought, sold and built. A nice, simple piece of cause and effect. But today’s mortgage rates are at levels that would have incited a buying frenzy a generation ago, employment is rising — and home sales, home building and mortgage originations are all flat-lining.
Zero Hedge and Automatic Earth recently posted good discussions of the current state of the housing market. Both articles conclude that housing is weak and getting weaker. But the real question is what this means for the rest of the economy. Is housing a discrete sector dealing with its own supply/demand issues, or is it a sign of things to come for consumer spending, government tax revenues, and business investment?
The argument for the latter scenario is based on the idea that newly-created currency pouring into the financial system pumps up asset prices, which convinces people that they’re rich enough to indulge in new cars, new clothes and nice vacations — and more stocks, bonds and houses.
But this “wealth effect” only works when the amount of debt in the system is low enough for new paper profits to change behavior. If people already carry too much debt, then they don’t feel comfortable borrowing even at historically low interest rates, and inflated asset prices become harder and harder to support. Either they stall or start moving lower, which shifts the wealth effect into reverse and sucks the air out of the economy.
The reason that so many economists didn’t see housing rolling over and don’t think it will affect the rest of the system in any event is that most Keynesian models don’t pay attention to society’s balance sheet. A given amount of new debt is supposed to increase “aggregate demand” by the same amount whether the government and consumers are debt-free or buried under a mountain of obligations taken on in years past. That’s a false assumption of course. Liabilities matter, and the fact that debt levels, especially student loans, are hitting records probably explains why housing isn’t behaving according to script.
The other fuel for a wealth effect-driven boom is the stock market. Here again, a nice pop has coincided with a big jump in debt, in this case margin debt, which investors incur when they borrow against stocks to buy more stocks. Late last year margin debt hit a new record and since then has gone even higher. Now it’s at levels that, based on history, imply less bang for each new borrowed dollar. Going forward it will be harder for investors to generate big returns by borrowing money and buying more equities. Taking profits will begin to seem more and more prudent, until sellers swamp buyers and the markets correct.
Assuming that equities plateau or start falling, what does that do mean for government’s strategy of using asset bubbles to pump up the consumer economy? Probably it derails it. The question is when.
John Hussman recently gave a great explanation of why pretty much every stock market valuation measure is now flashing either yellow or red. He notes that periods of extreme overvaluation like today are good indicators of low average stock market returns over the next decade, but not necessarily great trading signals. Stocks might get more overvalued before they stop. But that would raise the risk of a crash, which would have an even more serious impact on investor psyches. So either way, this year or next, the wealth effect will become the poverty effect, and asset owners will become asset sellers.
for The Daily Reckoning
Ed. Note: Mainstream economists sure do love their bubbles… They refuse to acknowledge them on the way up, and pretend to be ignorant of them on the way down. Of course, none of this helps you as an investor, unless of course you know the truth… That’s where signing up for The Daily Reckoning email edition could help net you a fortune. The Daily Reckoning gives you an honest, unfiltered look at the markets, and offers you real opportunities to safeguard and grow your wealth in any kind of market. And it’s all delivered to you, FREE, straight to your email inbox. So don’t wait. Sign up for FREE, right here and start making the most of your investment portfolio.
This article originally appeared here, courtesy of DollarCollapse.com
Investing from 2000-2012 wasn’t easy. You had the dot com bust. Then the housing bubble. Then the worst market crash in decades thanks to a crippling financial crisis. So yeah, you could say that investors are bit hesitant to jump back into the fray.
He is co-author, with GoldMoney’s James Turk, of The Collapse of the Dollar and How to Profit From It, and author of Clean Money: Picking Winners in the Green-Tech Boom and How to Profit from the Coming Real Estate Bust. A former Wall Street analyst and featured columnist with TheStreet.com, he currently writes for CFA Magazine.
Like everything in life, there are winners and losers -- money production is no exception. In fact, thanks to the opening the money spigot, Guido Hülsmann of the Mises Institute explains we're ultimately looking at worsening income inequality. Read on...
If you believe Apple’s advertisements, each new “iWatch” will be covered with gold. And they plan to sell millions of them. Today, our friend and colleague, Frank Holmes, takes a look at just how much gold Apple needs to pull it off, how serious they are, and what to watch for as the gold markets respond…
Palladium jetted off its lows and has just broken above key resistance, reaffirming its status as the highest-flying precious metal on the market...
If money were what really matters, Warren Buffett would have no peer. He has had unparalleled success in this world; surely he has a first-class ticket to the next. But what if Buffett's 84 years of luck turn on him now? Bill Bonner explores...
Our own Chris Mayer tells Henry Bonner why he sees no big theme in US stocks today -- just hidden opportunities for those who know where to look. Read the interview here...
A new study out of Sweden will have you thinking twice about making that phone call. The study analyzed cases of glioma, the most common form of brain tumor, in patients diagnosed in the years 1997–2003 and 2007–09. Stephen Petranek has more...