On Sunday, China was hit by the largest recorded distributed denial of service (DDOS) attack in its history. The attack took down around 32% of Web traffic to domain names with the “.cn” extension. The jury is still out on who’s to blame.
It’s incorrect to “infer that the attacker in this case had a significant amount of technical sophistication or resources,” Matthew Prince told The Wall Street Journal. Mr. Prince is the CEO of Web security provider CloudFlare. “It may well have been a single individual.”
It’s further confirmation that standing armies don’t matter as much as they once did.
“Now some Iranian in his PJs on his laptop, jamming out to Spotify and sipping kashk, can wreak havoc stateside,” noted our own Peter Coyne last week. “It doesn’t matter how mighty our warships are.”
Nowadays “hacktivism” isn’t just a thorn in government’s side. It’s become fashionable and cool. A 21st-century way to stick it to the man. Not to mention the people who make Guy Fawkes masks love it.
The battlefield has morphed. Warfare has turned digital. Here in our Baltimore office, we’re calling it the “fifth domain of war.” It’s just as destructive your granddad’s warfare, but without the usual bloody mess or costs.
Maybe that’s why the Defense Department’s scrambling to catch up to the times. How do you think they feel?
The Pentagon spends $500 billion per year, holds stern press conferences and lives by rigid protocols. But attacks like the one in China show they could be bested by a young rabble-rouser wearing a V for Vendetta mask.
You have to admit… it’s kind of funny.
In response, the DoD will retrofit its operation. Its weapon of choice? Binary. Now its challenge is making the technology accessible to its ranks. “The digital battlefield has to be as easy to navigate as an iPhone,” writes Wired magazine’s Noah Shachtman. “The attacks have to be as easy to launch as an Angry Bird.”
You know about Angry Birds, don’t you? (Tsk, tsk…)
Angry Birds is one of the most successful mobile apps of all time. The game’s concept is simple. You launch angry looking birds from a slingshot and try to hit hidden pigs. You just slide your finger back, then release and off your angry bird goes.
It’s a piece of cake. Everyone from adults to 4-year-olds plays it.
For a year, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has tried to mimic the game’s simplicity in the way it wages cyberattacks.
Heh. We’re sure the game’s creators never thought they’d inspire tomorrow’s warlords.
Mr. Shachtman points out that U.S. cyberoffensives have taken months of planning and have required small specialized units. Instead, the Pentagon wants “munitions made of 1s and 0s to be as simple to launch as ones made of metal and explosives.”
If it’s too difficult to launch a cyberattack, then the option is limited. Imagine having to know how to assemble a missile in order to launch one, instead of simply pressing the red button.
Simply put, the Pentagon wants to make cyberwar “user-friendly.” Wired reports that the Pentagon has brought in “designers behind some of Apple’s most famous computers — with assistance from the illustrators who helped bring Transformers to the silver screen.”
The name of DARPA’s cyber overhaul?
Plan X. (We didn’t make it up. It’s the Pentagon’s official title.) The DoD will shell out $16.1 billion in contract money to conduct their cyber makeover. Welcome to another instance of “extraction” — a term we first ran across two years ago.
“Washington’s empire,” said Reagan-era Treasury official Paul Craig Roberts last year, “extracts resources from the American people for the benefit of the few powerful interest groups that rule America. The U.S. Constitution has been extracted in the interests of the Security State, and Americans’ incomes have been redirected to the pockets of the 1%.”
A huge wealth extraction is about to take place once again.
for The Daily Reckoning
Ed. Note: Readers of the free Daily Reckoning email edition could have discovered seven small cybersecurity contractors that stand to haul off huge chunks of the $16.1 billion the Pentagon will spend. If you’d like to learn more about this opportunity — and others like it — we suggest you sign up for The Daily Reckoning, for free, right here.
With the highly publicized hack of Target's credit card systems over the holidays, corporate concern over cybersecurity has reached a fever pitch. And as the government ramps up it's own cybersecurity spending, the trend is pretty clear. But that's not the only concern the US has to deal with... Dave Gonigam explains...
Addison Wiggin is the executive publisher of Agora Financial, LLC, a fiercely independent economic forecasting and financial research firm. He's the creator and editorial director of Agora Financial's daily 5 Min. Forecast and editorial director of The Daily Reckoning. Wiggin is the founder of Agora Entertainment, executive producer and co-writer of I.O.U.S.A., which was nominated for the Grand Jury Prize at the 2008 Sundance Film Festival, the 2009 Critics Choice Award for Best Documentary Feature, and was also shortlisted for a 2009 Academy Award. He is the author of the companion book of the film I.O.U.S.A.and his second edition of The Demise of the Dollar, and Why it's Even Better for Your Investments was just fully revised and updated. Wiggin is a three-time New York Times best-selling author whose work has been recognized by The New York Times Magazine, The Economist, Worth, The New York Times, The Washington Post as well as major network news programs. He also co-authored international bestsellers Financial Reckoning Day and Empire of Debt with Bill Bonner.
Dr. Marc Faber discusses the Chinese stock market, as well as the contagion risk posed by the Greek debt crisis and the prospects for a resolution...
Puru Saxena explores Greece’s referendum, which will determine whether or not the nation accepts its creditors’ austerity measures...
Jim Rickards sat down one-on-one with Ben Bernanke on May 27th. Read on to listen in on their conversation and learn why “the international monetary system is not coherent”...
Charles Hugh Smith reports on why papering over the structural imbalances in the Eurozone with bailouts or bail-ins will not resolve the fundamental asymmetries in trade...
Chuck Butler discusses the stimulus in China and what he sees are the differences, plus details as Greece arrives in Brussels with their latest proposal for an agreement. All that and more in today's Daily Pfennig...
With the oil sector cruising in low gear since last year’s price collapse, should you be investing in oil companies? Yes, according to our friends at Sprott, Henry and Rick — especially if you look at mid-stream companies, which move oil from point A to point B. Since oil moves no matter the price, they make money no matter the price!