Can you imagine losing $119 billion in a single day?
That might sound like an impossible amount of money to lose in any amount of time, but in the high-stakes world of startups, it really can happen in a day.
And whenever there’s a “loser” in a zero-sum situation like this, there’s also a “winner.” The difference between the two?
When you invest in a startup… you’re investing in what it could become in the future.
Today, we’ll show you how a well-known company (you might even own the stock) lost $119 billion in a single day due to their lack of vision. And we’ll tell you about the winner on the other side of the table; the recipient of a cool $119 billion.
The year was 2006.
A relatively small company – they had a little over 100 employees at the time, and skimpy revenues – was presented with an offer to be acquired. The price tag?
The potential buyer?
One of the largest Internet companies in the world.
Initially, the press made it sound like the smaller company declined the offer. But recently, the truth came to light. In fact, they accepted the offer, and were ready to move ahead with the merger.
One ill-fated day, however, at the very last minute, the potential acquirer got cold feet. They decided to lower their offer by $200 million.
The smaller company walked away.
If you haven’t guessed it already, the big company was Yahoo! (YHOO) and the small company was Facebook (FB).
Yahoo! was ready to buy Facebook for a billion dollars.
To some, $1 billion for a company doing $30 million in sales and losing gobs of money seemed downright insane. But Yahoo! – initially anyway – stood behind its offer.
Then, one day in 2006, Yahoo’s stock price took a hit. Their board got scared about making $1 billion bets. They revised their offer for Facebook. They tried to value it in terms of what it was worth at that exact moment, not what it could become in the future.
This is a classic early-stage investing mistake: the short-term perception trap.
They decided to lower their offer to $800 million.
Meanwhile, unlike Yahoo!, Facebook’s perception of the future wasn’t clouded by short-term fluctuations in stock price.
They believed the world needed a new way to connect and share information. They believed in the power of social networking. And more than anything, they believed they could be the #1 social network in the world…
Although the $1 billion offer proved too tempting for Facebook to decline, the revised offer for $800 million seemed to splash water on their face and wake them up. It reminded them that if they became the #1 social network in the world, they’d be worth a whole lot more than $800 million or $1 billion.
And if Yahoo! hadn’t fallen into the perception trap – thinking in terms of days, weeks and quarters instead of decades -they might have acquired Facebook, currently a $120 billion asset, for a measly billion dollars.
A “loss” of $119 billion. That has to hurt.
If there’s a lesson here, it’s this: when you invest in startups, come to the table with a new framework.
It’s not like investing in the stock market. There’s no ticker to tell you when a company is undervalued or overvalued. There aren’t cashflow models you can use to determine fair value for the business.
When you invest in a startup, you’re not investing in what the company is today – you’re investing in what it could become in the future.
If Facebook had sold to Yahoo! for $1 billion (or even $800 million) they would’ve generated a fantastic return for their initial investors.
But by playing a “long hand” and executing on their vision, Facebook unlocked over $119 billion in additional value for its shareholders.
So before you invest, always ask yourself:
1. What’s the company’s vision? Do I share it?2. If this vision comes to fruition, what will its business look like?3. Do I believe the company has the right team to execute on this vision?
1. What’s the company’s vision? Do I share it?
2. If this vision comes to fruition, what will its business look like?
3. Do I believe the company has the right team to execute on this vision?
If you can answer these questions about vision – and feel good about the answers – you’ll be a good “long hand” startup investor!
Wayne Mulliganfor The Daily Reckoning
Ed. Note: Wayne’s knack for finding great startup companies has caught the attention of some serious investors. Thanks in part to his regular appearances in the Tomorrow in Review email edition, he’s paired up with a few of them to launch a brand new project, set to make early investors unbelievably wealthy by following a few simple rules. For more on this project as it develops, sign up for the FREE Tomorrow in Review email edition.
Every year there are thousands of small companies that may have a great idea, but need a little push to get going. And for the success stories, it can be very rewarding for early investors. Wayne Mulligan explains why that process just got a whole lot more interesting. Read on...
Wayne is a Financial Media entrepreneur and executive who is currently the Founder of Crowdability.com - a research service focused on the emerging equity crowdfunding market. Before that, he was CEO of The Institute for Individual Investors (IFII), a financial education & publishing company. At IFII, he helped grow sales to $10 million and spearheaded the company's sale to market-leader Agora Publishing in 2011.
He joined IFII when it acquired a company he'd founded, TickerHound.com – a technology platform for investors seeking answers to finance & investing questions.
A graduate of Columbia University, Wayne began his career in equity sales.
In addition to Buttonwood, Wayne sits on the Advisory Board of two financial media start-ups, Estimize and Market Realist.
One of the most heated political battles raging across the western world is debt versus austerity. In the U.S. this debate reached it's apex in 2011 when the U.S. credit rating was downgraded by Standard and Poor's. In today's essay, however, Chris Mayer throws the debate out the window, explaining why he thinks a U.S. debt crisis will never happen...
Believe it or not, more capital for a company doesn't necessarily mean better returns for investors. In fact, in a recent study that dug through data from more than 200 acquisitions going back to 2006, they found a "sweet spot" for the most likely acquisition targets. And it's lower than you think. Matthew Milner explains...
The Affordable Care Act dumped 2,000 pages of regulations into the health care sector, stifling any innovation that could have brought about real cost savings. But even with these obstacles, there are still people looking for ways to do things better and at a lower cost. These new technologies could be the key to fixing health care in America...
While many of the newer social media stocks struggle for gains this year, old-school tech stocks have become some of the best trades on the market. With the rare exception (Facebook is doing well—shares are up 26% year-to-date) the social stocks are in the gutter. They got off to a fast start in January and Februray, but ran out of steam in the spring. Aside from a few feeble attempts, few have posted anything close to a noteworthy comeback. Twitter, LinkedIn, and Groupon are all down double-digits year-to-date. Groupon—the worst performer on this short list—is down 47%. On the other had, the biggest of the big tech stocks on the market are helping traders pile up even larger gains right now. Greg Guenthner explains…
In the 1960s, total credit in the U.S. broke the one trillion dollar mark...and since then, it has expanded over 50 times. But now, as Richard Duncan explains, the explosion of credit that's made America prosperous, threatens to take the entire economy down. And that could mean the return of another depression...