Can you imagine losing $119 billion in a single day?
That might sound like an impossible amount of money to lose in any amount of time, but in the high-stakes world of startups, it really can happen in a day.
And whenever there’s a “loser” in a zero-sum situation like this, there’s also a “winner.” The difference between the two?
When you invest in a startup… you’re investing in what it could become in the future.
Today, we’ll show you how a well-known company (you might even own the stock) lost $119 billion in a single day due to their lack of vision. And we’ll tell you about the winner on the other side of the table; the recipient of a cool $119 billion.
The year was 2006.
A relatively small company – they had a little over 100 employees at the time, and skimpy revenues – was presented with an offer to be acquired. The price tag?
The potential buyer?
One of the largest Internet companies in the world.
Initially, the press made it sound like the smaller company declined the offer. But recently, the truth came to light. In fact, they accepted the offer, and were ready to move ahead with the merger.
One ill-fated day, however, at the very last minute, the potential acquirer got cold feet. They decided to lower their offer by $200 million.
The smaller company walked away.
If you haven’t guessed it already, the big company was Yahoo! (YHOO) and the small company was Facebook (FB).
Yahoo! was ready to buy Facebook for a billion dollars.
To some, $1 billion for a company doing $30 million in sales and losing gobs of money seemed downright insane. But Yahoo! – initially anyway – stood behind its offer.
Then, one day in 2006, Yahoo’s stock price took a hit. Their board got scared about making $1 billion bets. They revised their offer for Facebook. They tried to value it in terms of what it was worth at that exact moment, not what it could become in the future.
This is a classic early-stage investing mistake: the short-term perception trap.
They decided to lower their offer to $800 million.
Meanwhile, unlike Yahoo!, Facebook’s perception of the future wasn’t clouded by short-term fluctuations in stock price.
They believed the world needed a new way to connect and share information. They believed in the power of social networking. And more than anything, they believed they could be the #1 social network in the world…
Although the $1 billion offer proved too tempting for Facebook to decline, the revised offer for $800 million seemed to splash water on their face and wake them up. It reminded them that if they became the #1 social network in the world, they’d be worth a whole lot more than $800 million or $1 billion.
And if Yahoo! hadn’t fallen into the perception trap – thinking in terms of days, weeks and quarters instead of decades -they might have acquired Facebook, currently a $120 billion asset, for a measly billion dollars.
A “loss” of $119 billion. That has to hurt.
If there’s a lesson here, it’s this: when you invest in startups, come to the table with a new framework.
It’s not like investing in the stock market. There’s no ticker to tell you when a company is undervalued or overvalued. There aren’t cashflow models you can use to determine fair value for the business.
When you invest in a startup, you’re not investing in what the company is today – you’re investing in what it could become in the future.
If Facebook had sold to Yahoo! for $1 billion (or even $800 million) they would’ve generated a fantastic return for their initial investors.
But by playing a “long hand” and executing on their vision, Facebook unlocked over $119 billion in additional value for its shareholders.
So before you invest, always ask yourself:
1. What’s the company’s vision? Do I share it?2. If this vision comes to fruition, what will its business look like?3. Do I believe the company has the right team to execute on this vision?
1. What’s the company’s vision? Do I share it?
2. If this vision comes to fruition, what will its business look like?
3. Do I believe the company has the right team to execute on this vision?
If you can answer these questions about vision – and feel good about the answers – you’ll be a good “long hand” startup investor!
Wayne Mulliganfor The Daily Reckoning
Ed. Note: Wayne’s knack for finding great startup companies has caught the attention of some serious investors. Thanks in part to his regular appearances in the Tomorrow in Review email edition, he’s paired up with a few of them to launch a brand new project, set to make early investors unbelievably wealthy by following a few simple rules. For more on this project as it develops, sign up for the FREE Tomorrow in Review email edition.
The threat of cyberattack is now one of the biggest concerns of any major corporation - not to mention sovereign nation. Naturally that's led to serious advances in cybersecurity technology. And, as Matthew Milner points out, one new startup is about to have a serious impact on the entire industry. Read on...
Wayne is a Financial Media entrepreneur and executive who is currently the Founder of Crowdability.com - a research service focused on the emerging equity crowdfunding market. Before that, he was CEO of The Institute for Individual Investors (IFII), a financial education & publishing company. At IFII, he helped grow sales to $10 million and spearheaded the company's sale to market-leader Agora Publishing in 2011.
He joined IFII when it acquired a company he'd founded, TickerHound.com – a technology platform for investors seeking answers to finance & investing questions.
A graduate of Columbia University, Wayne began his career in equity sales.
In addition to Buttonwood, Wayne sits on the Advisory Board of two financial media start-ups, Estimize and Market Realist.
Government life support…liquidity injection… or a giant Band-Aid…whatever you want to call it, quantitative easing is the keeping the global economic ship afloat – but for how much longer? Richard Duncan explores…
Ben Bernanke introduced the world to the concept of "quantitative easing" back in 2002. It was an "unorthodox plan" to save the economy from the horrors of deflation. But the monstrous economy it has actually created is in some ways far worse. And as Richard Duncan explains, it's not going to end any time soon. Read on..
While the technical details of Bitcoin may intimidate the novice, they shouldn’t keep him from getting in on a digital currency revolution that -- while taking different forms -- isn’t going away. How do you get the simplest, easiest-to-act-on tips about how to invest, safeguard and grow your digital wealth? Dominic Frisby has more…
The duality is stark. In one hand, we have an energy renaissance underway, in the other, a virus is threatening to wreak havoc on the markets and, potentially, your life. Nothing we’re currently doing to fight the Ebola virus will work in 2014, say the researchers. Nothing we’re currently doing will beat it in 2015, either. We need a new game-plan. Read on…
Lose your shirt in 3D printing stocks this year? Don’t kick yourself. You’re not alone. (Okay, kick yourself a little if it’ll make you feel better.) You need to make sure you don’t lose your 3D-printed shirt in the next tech craze. Because there will be a next time. Look, it’s really not your fault if you got taken for a ride on 3D stocks. Greg Guenthner has more...