“A penny saved is twopence clear,” wrote Benjamin Franklin in his now-classic Poor Richard’s Almanack, published annually between 1732–58. Franklin’s Almanack embodied — and perhaps shaped — the ethos of money in Colonial America.
Today, we’re far from pennies earning more pennies. Heck, we hardly even talk about pennies after a century of inflation. These days, if you deposit money in a bank, you receive historically low interest rates. I’ll show you an astonishing chart in a moment.
First, though, consider… What are the implications of low interest rates? How should you tailor investing to low interest? In this write-up, I have some thoughts on beating the low interest problem while preserving your wealth over the long haul…
How bad are interest rates — for savers, at least? Look at the chart below, based on data going back to 1790. It puts a new spin on Ben Franklin’s old quip about a “penny saved.” A penny saved earned strong interest, back in Franklin’s day!
Throughout most of U.S. history, you could “earn” decent money by following Franklin’s advice and saving pennies. For over two centuries, U.S. interest rates have seldom been less than 4–5%. Often, rates were higher. If you’d followed Franklin’s advice and saved pennies, you’d have earned decent returns over the long haul.
Not anymore! In the past five years, interest rates have crashed below even previous rock bottoms during the Great Depression and World War II. How low is low these days? Let’s take a closer look, using a chart of interest rates over the past six decades, prepared by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
Just eyeballing the chart, you can see the 5% interest level running across much of the past six decades. Rates were lower sometimes and higher at other times. For example, look at how the fed funds rate spiked up strongly during the recessions of the 1970s and early 1980s, in a battle against inflation.
But look at interest rates since 2008. Over the past five years, they plummeted. Where’s Ben Franklin when you need him? After the crash of 2008, the Fed dropped rates like a stone, and kept them down near zero.
Savers suffer at zero interest. Down at the bank, you don’t even earn pennies on the dollar. The Fed and its principals know this. In fact, they know it and don’t care!
Last year, none other than Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke cried crocodile tears over the low interest issue. In a speech, Bernanke stated, “I know that people who rely on investments that pay a fixed interest rate, such as certificates of deposit, are receiving very low returns, a situation that has involved significant hardship for some.”
Yes, and boohoo for you. If you’re a saver, Ben Bernanke feels your pain. But pain or no, the Fed has kept interest rates low, and that’s the plan looking ahead.
Even worse, there may be more pain to come, because lately there’s talk of banks charging fees to hold your funds. That is, you’ll pay the banks, in a form of “negative” interest! In the brave new world of modern money, the Fed’s Ben has turned the other Ben — Mr. Franklin — on his head.
Low interest rates rob the noble saver. The saver defers instant gratification, yet receives nothing for the effort. It goes against history. It ought to change, “one of these days.” But we’re stuck with this situation for now – even as we enter the Janet Yellen era.
Along the way, it’s infuriating to do the “right thing” and save but then get kicked around for it. All that and, broadly speaking, it’s not so much individual savers who are harmed by low interest rates. Large-scale damage from low interest rates affects institutional money and pension funds. We’re not talking about “pennies saved” here. We’re looking at literally trillions of dollars of pension funds and such all seeking return.
With low interest rates, many basic assumptions behind large-scale saving and future returns go out the window. Institutional and fund managers look ahead, run the numbers and foresee account deficits. Then? Well, then they change their behavior. Often as not, people do things inconsistent with long-term economic growth. Like what?
Consider that at low interest rates, many individuals save more, borrow less and pay down debt. That’s good for the individual, perhaps, but slows the economy.
Elsewhere, businesses divert funds from new capital expansion to bulk up pensions. Meanwhile, institutions beat up company managements to cut costs (often as not by laying off workers) and fund share buybacks. Fewer workers? Less capex? There goes the future seed corn for growth.
Even governments bite the bullet. The political tendency is to raise taxes and/or scale back on, say, maintenance on infrastructure, while steering funds to undercapitalized pension accounts.
At the Fed, policy honchos — welcome to the club Janet Yellen(!) — claim that low interest rates stimulate borrowing and spur the economy. So after five years of low rates, where’s the spurred-on economy? One can just as easily argue that low interest rates lead to less money going to concrete, steel and new machinery. If the past five years are any guide, economic growth is slow when interest rates are zero.
Plus, low interest rates create large amounts of essentially “dry tinder” across the economy. That is, people and firms borrow simply for the sake of borrowing at low interest. It’s more fun to play with somebody else’s money, right?
But looking ahead into 2014 and beyond, what happens when the business cycle turns and profits or incomes fall? How does the borrower service debt? Or worse, what happens when (not if) those interest rates go back up? Where’s the money? Well, I suppose that’s what bankruptcy court is for.
In an era of low interest rates, investors aren’t getting return down at the bank. To paraphrase that famous line from the television show Seinfeld, “No Ben Franklin for you!”
Another investment alternative is dividend-paying shares. In these pages we cover numerous solid, well-capitalized dividend payers, from large oil companies to master limited partnerships and others.
Meanwhile, we have to wait for the other interest rate shoe to drop from the Fed. My concern is what will happen when the markets sense the first signs of interest rates rising. Eventually, somebody has to pull that trigger and get rates back to some semblance of historical norm. On that day, expect heavy selling pressure as people book gains.
We’re not there yet — even in the face of the taper, nobody is raising rates. For now, you need to appreciate the situation. As investors, we have to balance the need for return in a time of low rates with the risk of what happens when things begin to turn. Stick to those quality dividend payers. I’ll write about this much more as 2014 unfolds.
Thanks for reading.
Byron W. Kingfor The Daily Reckoning
Ed. Note: It’s important to safeguard your wealth in an era when savers are treated as economic pariahs. And the best way to do that is to stay informed. That’s why Byron contributes regularly to the Daily Resource Hunter – a service designed to help investors protect and grow their wealth in uncertain times… especially in the resource and energy spaces. Sign up for FREE, right here to get started.
This article originally appeared in the Daily Resource Hunter
Central banks manipulate money. That much is certain. But is there something even more sinister - even criminal - going on behind the closed doors? Today, Douglas French takes a closer look at these hallowed monetary institutions, and why it pays to have political connections to those within their walls. Read on...
Byron King is the editor of Outstanding Investments, Byron King's Military-Tech Alert, and Real Wealth Trader. He is a Harvard-trained geologist who has traveled to every U.S. state and territory and six of the seven continents. He has conducted site visits to mineral deposits in 26 countries and deep-water oil fields in five oceans. This provides him with a unique perspective on the myriad of investment opportunities in energy and mineral exploration. He has been interviewed by dozens of major print and broadcast media outlets including The Financial Times, The Guardian, The Washington Post, MSN Money, MarketWatch, Fox Business News, and PBS Newshour.
One of the most heated political battles raging across the western world is debt versus austerity. In the U.S. this debate reached it's apex in 2011 when the U.S. credit rating was downgraded by Standard and Poor's. In today's essay, however, Chris Mayer throws the debate out the window, explaining why he thinks a U.S. debt crisis will never happen...
Believe it or not, more capital for a company doesn't necessarily mean better returns for investors. In fact, in a recent study that dug through data from more than 200 acquisitions going back to 2006, they found a "sweet spot" for the most likely acquisition targets. And it's lower than you think. Matthew Milner explains...
The Affordable Care Act dumped 2,000 pages of regulations into the health care sector, stifling any innovation that could have brought about real cost savings. But even with these obstacles, there are still people looking for ways to do things better and at a lower cost. These new technologies could be the key to fixing health care in America...
While many of the newer social media stocks struggle for gains this year, old-school tech stocks have become some of the best trades on the market. With the rare exception (Facebook is doing well—shares are up 26% year-to-date) the social stocks are in the gutter. They got off to a fast start in January and Februray, but ran out of steam in the spring. Aside from a few feeble attempts, few have posted anything close to a noteworthy comeback. Twitter, LinkedIn, and Groupon are all down double-digits year-to-date. Groupon—the worst performer on this short list—is down 47%. On the other had, the biggest of the big tech stocks on the market are helping traders pile up even larger gains right now. Greg Guenthner explains…
In the 1960s, total credit in the U.S. broke the one trillion dollar mark...and since then, it has expanded over 50 times. But now, as Richard Duncan explains, the explosion of credit that's made America prosperous, threatens to take the entire economy down. And that could mean the return of another depression...