Matt Insley

We’re closing in on the five year anniversary of the most severe market drop in recent history.

From the last week of September 2008 through the beginning of October 2008 the Dow shed over 2,000 points – representing an overall market drop of more than 23%.

$700B is a lot of money, but it pales in comparison to what’s being spent TODAY.

Those were the bad old days. The early innings of a market drop that saw the DOW cut in half.

With this epic anniversary in mind, let’s not miss the opportunity to take a look in the rearview and measure just what happened in response this 2008’s epic market collapse. As usual, we’ll also discuss a way to play what we’ve learned…

Back in 2008 and early 2009 when the sky was falling the “stupid-big” number (so big it’s stupid) was $700 billion. Back then we were told that a shock and awe bailout would cure the market’s woes… after all it was $700 billion! That’s a lotta dough!

Flash forward five years and that $700B was only the tip of the iceberg. The dough has been rolling for five years and counting.

In fact, right now we’re about a year into the Fed’s third round of quantitative easing (QE) or as we like to call it QE “Infinity.” Point being when the latest installment of the Feds’ fix started it was meant to be short-lived. After all, spending $85 billion a month can only last so long, right?

Wrongo!

Here we are nearly 12 months into QE infinity and we’ve spent nearly a trillion dollars! It’s the government’s stealth QE. The one that keeps on taking!

Ah and all from the humble beginnings of a $700B bailout.

Let’s do a little “billions” math…

  • $2 Billion would cure Colorado’s recent flood damage
  • $1-5 Billion can build a new power plant (from nat gas to nuclear!)
  • $40 Billion was about what it cost BP to cleanup their Gulf Of Mexico oil spill
  • $50 Billion is the cost estimate for Hurricane Sandy
  • $108 Billion was needed to fix damage from Hurricane Katrina
  • $185 Billion is the going rate for five years of Exxon’s capital costs. [Exxon produces over 5 million barrels of oil equivalent per day – of note, that’s enough to offset 27% of the U.S.’s oil use. In other words, if the Fed put its money towards oil production, 1 out of every 4 people could have free gas!]

Needless to say, $700B is a lot of money, but it pales in comparison to what’s being spent TODAY.

Think of it like this…

The Fed could be fixing up 42 Colorado towns a month, building anywhere from 17 to 85 power plants a month, cleaning up a gulf spill PLUS a hurricane disaster per month, or cover two years of Exxon’s budget per month.

But, alas, the Fed isn’t doing anything “real” by my count. Instead the $85B per month goes towards buying bonds and mortgage-backed securities.

Okay you get the point. When it comes to “billions” math, the government is spending an ENORMOUS amount of money per month. (At the 5 year anniversary of the market collapse and almost the year anniversary of QE infinity, it’s VERY important to take note.)

The printed cash is flowing into a black abyss. You and I won’t see it, but we’re told it’s single-handedly helping prop up the economy.

I’ve got to come clean. I did make one error above. The point is, you can’t combat the Fed’s agenda with rationality. I mistakenly brought forth the idea that Fed spending (if it’s to happen at all) could be used more productively. But that was the wrong logic.

That is, you can’t expect the Fed to do something productive with all of the cash it’s printing. Instead that money is quickly being funneled into other government programs and the balance sheet of America’s largest banks.

It’s a grand cover-up. While the market continues to churn the Fed is simply trying to buy more time. They need to get more money to cover up a bunch of big bank’s bad decisions (dating back to 2007 and before.)

With enough time the Fed’s “magic” will indeed work… But at what price does this “magic” come?

Oh, what’s that? The big banks underwrote a zillion bad loans back in 2007? Wow, and they were all subprime borrowers that never had a chance in hell of paying off their debt? Hmmmm.

And here we are five years later still trying to cover over those bad bets – keeping interest rates low to spur the housing market, while also funneling billions directly into mortgage-backed securities.

With enough time the Fed’s “magic” will indeed work. At some point all of the bad bets that banks made will be a distant memory. Their balance sheets won’t be bleeding red and the housing market will be somewhat back to normal.

But at what price does this “magic” come?

I’m glad you’re still with me, because here’s the kicker… the price is what any run of the mill contractor would charge – heck it’s the same billing philosophy if you’re getting new drywall installed in your basement: time and money or T&M for short.

It’s our T, because here we are five years later and we’re still watching the Fed print billions. And it’s our M. If you’re paying taxes or trying to save your modest wealth, you’re on the hook.

The great cover up continues and so does the Fed’s war on savers. In fact, if there’s one takeaway from the last 5 months of Fed Theatre, it’s that you can expect the easing to continue – in some form – well into the future.

Luckily there are a few conclusions we can make during this battle of attrition.

  1. Easing will continue.
  2. It’s your job to grow your own wealth. Don’t count on your bank account or bonds!

That said, many of our favorite investments have a bright future ahead. I’m talking about energy and mining plays.

Momentum is rolling higher for oil and gas shares – we’re truly in the early innings of a massive earth-changing revolution. As U.S. shale plays continue to ramp higher these profitable assets, I say, should hold a strong position in your portfolio. As the Fed prints, producers profit!

Momentum isn’t as strong for our friends in the mining sector, but don’t count the golden age over just yet! Last week while slightly tuning in to a CNBC broadcast I heard the talking heads ask a simple question: which price will an ounce of gold fetch first (from its current price) $1,000 or $2,000?

It’s a loaded question to be sure. But I don’t much care about the short-term answer. So instead of answering which will hit first, I’d pose another question: will gold hit $2,000 in the long-term?

The answer is a resounding YES. So whether that happens in the next year or the next five, holding on to your favorite, well-run mining plays will pay off.

The five year anniversary of the subprime market meltdown lends us an important lesson: you can’t trust your financial future to the Fed. As the Fed Theatre continues to play out – and the printing press hums along – look to your favorite energy and mining plays for profit. (Many of which you’ll find right here in these pages!)

Keep your boots muddy,

Matt Insley
for The Daily Reckoning

P.S. What’s funny, while the Fed continues to print there is one little-known government sector that will continue to profit! Recently a leaked set of government documents all but guarantees that one sector will absolutely soar. And if you’re a Daily Reckoning subscriber, you had a chance to learn just what sector and, more importantly, what companies stand to make huge gains because of these documents. Don’t miss out on this and other incredible opportunities delivered straight to your inbox every day. Sign up for The Daily Reckoning right here.

You May Also Like:


More Financial Lessons from the Head of the Fed

Jim Mosquera

Between spurring job growth and providing price stability, Fed Chairwoman Janet Yellen certainly has her hands full. And thanks to Fed "mission creep" it's only going to get harder. Today, Jim Mosquera examines the second half of Ms. Yellen's interview for the documentary Money for Nothing: Inside the Federal Reserve. Read on...

Matt Insley

Matt Insley is the managing editor of The Daily Resource Hunter and now the co-editor of Real Wealth Trader and Outstanding Investments. Matt is the Agora Financial in-house specialist on commodities and natural resources. He holds a degree from the University of Maryland with a double major in Business and Environmental Economics. Although always familiar with the financial markets, his main area of expertise stems from his background in the Agricultural and Natural Resources (AGNR) department. Over the past years he's stayed well ahead of the curve with forward thinking ideas in both resource stocks and hard commodities. Insley's commentary has been featured by MarketWatch.

  • Tom Sawyer

    So what would you suggest, stop the presses and start over?

Recent Articles

The One Number Every Penny Stock Investor Overlooks

Jonas Elmerraji

When it comes to investing in small companies with explosive growth potential, there is one number investors tend to be fixated on: share price. But as Jonas Elmerraji explains, there is another number that is far more important when it comes to discovering quality investments on the cheap. Read on...


Winners and Losers in the Battle of Economic Stupidity

Douglas French

A lot of people are buying to a lot of bad ideas right now, based on faulty logic or blindly following a political agenda. But if you ask the right questions, you can expose these ideas, as well as the people who support them, and show how silly (and stupid) they really are. Thankfully, one man has been doing just that for decades. Doug French explains...


Smart Investments in the Mobile Revolution

Greg Guenthner

The world is obsessed with smartphones. Most people can't go ten minutes without checking their phone for status updates on Facebook or Twitter or any number of apps they happen to have. And while Facebook's stock continues to soar, it's only natural to wonder, "What's the best way to play this mobile revolution?" Greg Guenthner explains...


The US Debt Crisis that Will Never Happen

Chris Mayer

One of the most heated political battles raging across the western world is debt versus austerity. In the U.S. this debate reached it's apex in 2011 when the U.S. credit rating was downgraded by Standard and Poor's. In today's essay, however, Chris Mayer throws the debate out the window, explaining why he thinks a U.S. debt crisis will never happen...


3 Tips to Finding Small Companies With Huge Potential

Matthew Milner

Believe it or not, more capital for a company doesn't necessarily mean better returns for investors. In fact, in a recent study that dug through data from more than 200 acquisitions going back to 2006, they found a "sweet spot" for the most likely acquisition targets. And it's lower than you think. Matthew Milner explains...