US fiscal policy has been out of whack for so long that both Democrats and Republicans share a part in the blame. But, for a recent column in the Financial Times Gideon Rachman focuses on the Republican role in debt creation. In particular, he looks at how Ronald Reagan’s strengths and weaknesses in office have evolved over time into a muddled mess of tax and spending strategy.
From the Financial Times:
“The Republican party – with Ms Palin to the fore – is currently decrying the huge deficits being run by the Obama administration. But this is a recent conversion. Ever since the Reagan years, the Republicans have been the party of deficit spending.
“Conservatives once believed both in lower taxes and in balancing the budget. Under Reagan, they simply became the party of tax cuts, without any commitment to fiscal responsibility.
“Dick Cheney, George W. Bush’s vice-president, admitted as much when he told a cabinet colleague: “Reagan proved deficits don’t matter.”
“A mystical belief took hold that if you just cut taxes, the economy would grow fast enough to cover the shortfall – or government would shrink, almost by magic. Somehow it would all come right.
“This drift in Republican thinking was actually profoundly anti-conservative – because it elevated ideology (cut taxes at any cost) over a pragmatic commitment to good governance.”
The idea that tax cuts alone — without a reduction in spending — can increase the wealth of the nation was unrealistic at best. Over time that shortcut thinking has only lead to worse ideas, such as the belief mentioned above that deficits are no longer important. Unfortunately, there still appears to be no magic cure for deficits.
You can read more details in Rachman’s Financial Times commentary on how Reagan ruined conservatism.
Rocky Vega,The Daily Reckoning
Rocky Vega is publisher of Agora Financial International, where he advances the growth of Agora Financial publishing enterprises outside of the US. Previously, he was publisher of The Daily Reckoning, and founding publisher of both UrbanTurf and RFID Update -- which he ran from Brazil, Chile, and Puerto Rico -- as well as associate publisher of FierceFinance. Rocky has an honors MS from the Stockholm School of Economics and an honors BA from Harvard University, where he served on the board of directors for Let?s Go Publications, Harvard Student Agencies, and The Harvard Advocate.
there is an even better treatment of this topic by the ghost of reagan past in the incarnation of david stockman….one of his recent articles was carried by mises.org….very much worth the read…
the republicans and democrats are one and the same party controlled by the same puppet masters….not a whit’s bit of difference…
This is true. A balanced plan is going to allow the tax cuts to increase the buying power of the consumer as well as cut spending because less tax money is coming in.
Are you trying to be even more retarded than Rachman? Is that possible?
Revenue doubled in the 1980′s. Why?
Well, some reduction in tax rates (that’s what your retarded cabal calls tax cuts) raises revenue some doesn’t.
Revenues went up because many rates were too high. Not all but many
How many stores raise prices on goods to increase sales? Have you ever heard of “percent off” sales to get sales?
Frankly, calling you a retard is an insult to retards.
A mother was preparing pancakes for her sons, Kevin, 5, and Ryan, 3. The boys began to argue over who would get the first pancake. Their mother saw the opportunity for a moral lesson. If Jesus were sitting here, He would say, “Let my brother have the first pancake. I can wait.”Kevin turned to his younger brother and said, “Ryan, you be Jesus.”
You have got to be a fool to believe this recession is over and the US economy will return to robust growth. The US govt. is spending money far in excess of tax revenues. Printing money we dont have. Additionally, the govt. has no way of paying for future Social Security and Medicare payments it has promised. Higher taxes are inevitable, which will depress business activity further. Hyperinflation is not too far away either, given the huge increase in money supply.
After the 2008 financial crisis, little could be heard over the deafening cries of "mission accomplished." And while the Fed's massive QE program seemed to work, the question remains: for how long? Addison Wiggin explains why the next round of QE will fail miserably, paving the way for the IMF to step in with something called "special drawing rights." Read on...
Despite what you hear in the mainstream news, the commercial market for small drones could eventually dwarf the military one. In fact, it’s already happening. This is a big market, and it's getting bigger by the day. Today, Wayne Mulligan explains how to get in on the ground floor. Read on...
While a traditional "buy and hold" investment strategy can be a good way to make money in the long run, it's by no means the only way. For those investors who dismiss technical trading as a "witchcraft" and impossible to figure out, Greg Guenthner has just two charts to show you that could completely alter how you feel about trading stock market trends. Read on...
American citizens aren’t the only ones fleeing the country because they don’t like the direction it’s headed. Corporations expatriate for similar reasons. So why are companies desperate enough about corporate tax to leave the U.S., the champion of freedom and enterprise? Clem Chambers explains here...
Milton Friedman is roundly regarded as one of the great economists of the 20th century. But his view of the Bretton Woods system was all wrong. And the current mess of floating exchange rates proves that. Today, Lewis Lehrman explains how the current monetary system pits every country against each other in a financial "race to the bottom"...