When news broke that the U.S. government had granted itself the right to spy on Americans’ emails and phone calls, it triggered a predictable public firestorm.
But did you know that the revelations could also cost the United States up to $35 billion?
Dig a little deeper and you’ll see that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) allowed Washington to go further than just violating people’s privacy. It also has serious ramifications for Corporate America.
Here’s what I’m talking about…
Trouble in the Cloud
It’s been two months since Edward Snowden ratted out the U.S. government. But some say that the mass surveillance program dates back to 2008.
And it turns out that the government wasn’t just rummaging around in Americans’ personal business. It was also snooping in other countries’ private data. That jeopardizes the integrity of U.S.-based companies that specialize in storing data in “the cloud.”
And with foreigners now more wary of U.S. intelligence-gathering practices, it could cost these cloud storage providers billions in lost customer revenue from abroad.
The dollar figure attached to the consequences is still very new — and raw.
But a report from the Information Technology & Innovation Foundation (ITIF) estimated that if U.S. cloud providers were to lose 10-20% of foreign business, it would cost them anywhere from $21.5-35 billion over the next three years.
So what are the odds of this actually happening?
As it happens, pretty good…
Foreigners Are Shunning America
The ITIF conducted a survey shortly after Snowden made his knowledge public, which revealed that “10% of foreign companies using cloud-computing services said they’d already canceled a project with a U.S. cloud provider, and 56% said they’d be less likely to use U.S.-based providers.”
That spells “Trouble”… with a capital “T.” Why?
Because during its earnings call last month, IBM revealed that its cloud revenue soared by 70% over the first half of the year. And it’s just as well that the area performed so well, since the company’s total revenue fell by 3.3%.
And you’ve got to wonder where it puts IBM’s pending multimillion-dollar agreement with Capital online Data Service Co. Ltd. — one of China’s leading Internet data center companies — to build and manage its public cloud service.
Oracle is in the same boat as IBM. While its cloud revenue jumped by 50% for the quarter ending May 31, overall revenue dropped 1%.
With these revenue-challenged companies depending on their cloud businesses, the results of the ITIF survey don’t bode well.
But they’re certainly not the only ones facing the fallout…
America’s Loss Is the World’s Gain
According to The Guardian, some of America’s largest Internet companies are involved in the U.S. government’s mass data collection program: Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, Apple, YouTube (owned by Google) and AOL. They all stand to lose credibility, customers and revenue.
But their losses present a big opportunity for European and Asian companies to pick up the slack from the growing global cloud market.
A market that’s forecast to be worth $148.8 billion in 2014… $160 billion in 2015… and $207 billion in 2016.
In fact, Artmotion, Switzerland’s largest offshore hosting company, has already scooped up a big portion of the leftovers. Since the Snowden leaks, its revenue has bounced 45% higher. The description on its website: “State-of-the-art data centre situated within the safe confines of Switzerland, the country for confidentiality and rock-steady reliability.”
And who doesn’t want some confidentiality right now?!
Nobody knows exactly what the fallout will be for U.S. cloud companies just yet. As ITIF analyst Daniel Castro states, “Due to the clandestine nature [of the cloud industry] — Amazon, for example, submerges AWS revenue in a nebulous ‘other’ category, and Microsoft has buried Azure so deep in its balance sheet it’s impossible to get a rough estimate on its cloud revenue — making these predictions is difficult.”
But suffice it to say these companies are facing government-induced head winds, with a suspicious public reluctant to trust American companies with their personal data.
On a positive note, if untrusting users of public clouds seek the safer haven of private or foreign clouds, it could open up new possibilities for investors. I’ll keep you updated on any compelling opportunities that I dig up.
Ahead of the tape,
Louis Basenesefor Tomorrow in Review
The company has created technology that focuses not on what a person says, but how they say it. It goes "beyond verbal," using voice signals (such as intonation and modulation) in order to gauge the mood, feelings and emotions behind a person's words and get a true representation of what they really think.
A former Wall Street consultant and analyst, Louis helped direct over $1 billion in institutional capital before founding WSD Insider and Wall Street Daily where he serves as Chief Investment Strategist. In addition to being an expert on small-cap stocks, Louis is also well versed in special situations including mergers and acquisitions and spinoffs. His commentary has been featured in several media outlets, including MarketWatch. And he’s also a top-rated speaker at financial conferences throughout the country. A New Jersey native, Louis earned his MBA with honors from the Crummer Graduate School of Business at Rollins College. He draws upon both his academic and professional experiences to edit his short-term trading service: MicroCap Tech Trader.
Actually, an awful lot of damage was done back when the MPAA/RIAA puppet aka the “justice” department went after MegaUpload. The fact that the Feds arbitrarily shut down *everything*, including users’ access to their own property and data pretty much put the kibosh on trusting anything to the cloud. One guy who put his business data and property in (all legitimate, all his) is STILL fighting to get it back.
After the Snowden Revelations, the only real advice you can give in regard to “cloud computing” is: Trust NOTHING to “the cloud,” and that means anybody’s cloud.
Like it or not, size does matter. But contrary to a popular saying, bigger is not always better. Especially when it comes to the size of the state. Marc Faber explains why a world of smaller states might function better than one dominated by excessively large "superpowers." Read on...
Pope Francis recently warned people to beware the "tyranny" of capitalism. Hmmm... Would that be true capitalism and trust in free enterprise? Or the crony capitalism we're currently saddled with? Bill Bonner explains why, even though capitalism is easily corrupted by the capitalists, that doesn't necessarily mean it is a bum creed. Read on...
Let's face it... Gold and silver have had a crappy year. That's actually putting it mildly. In reality, they're on the shortlist for "worst performing assets of the year." But as Greg Guenthner explains, that distinction doesn't plague all precious metals. And that good fortune could carry on through 2014. Read on...
2013 has been one heck of a year for stocks. But with a just a few weeks left in the year, can that momentum continue? Byron King thinks so, and sees 5 opportunities to be thankful for as 2013 comes to a close... and that could carry on into next year. Read on...
Income inequality in the U.S. has reached epic proportions. So much so that "1%" is no longer just a simple fraction. Now it's now much more than that, used as a pejorative symbol of excessive wealth and the greed of the American upper class. Marc Faber explains why this is unfair, especially as regards U.S. tax laws. Read on...