When news broke that the U.S. government had granted itself the right to spy on Americans’ emails and phone calls, it triggered a predictable public firestorm.
But did you know that the revelations could also cost the United States up to $35 billion?
Dig a little deeper and you’ll see that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) allowed Washington to go further than just violating people’s privacy. It also has serious ramifications for Corporate America.
Here’s what I’m talking about…
Trouble in the Cloud
It’s been two months since Edward Snowden ratted out the U.S. government. But some say that the mass surveillance program dates back to 2008.
And it turns out that the government wasn’t just rummaging around in Americans’ personal business. It was also snooping in other countries’ private data. That jeopardizes the integrity of U.S.-based companies that specialize in storing data in “the cloud.”
And with foreigners now more wary of U.S. intelligence-gathering practices, it could cost these cloud storage providers billions in lost customer revenue from abroad.
The dollar figure attached to the consequences is still very new — and raw.
But a report from the Information Technology & Innovation Foundation (ITIF) estimated that if U.S. cloud providers were to lose 10-20% of foreign business, it would cost them anywhere from $21.5-35 billion over the next three years.
So what are the odds of this actually happening?
As it happens, pretty good…
Foreigners Are Shunning America
The ITIF conducted a survey shortly after Snowden made his knowledge public, which revealed that “10% of foreign companies using cloud-computing services said they’d already canceled a project with a U.S. cloud provider, and 56% said they’d be less likely to use U.S.-based providers.”
That spells “Trouble”… with a capital “T.” Why?
Because during its earnings call last month, IBM revealed that its cloud revenue soared by 70% over the first half of the year. And it’s just as well that the area performed so well, since the company’s total revenue fell by 3.3%.
And you’ve got to wonder where it puts IBM’s pending multimillion-dollar agreement with Capital online Data Service Co. Ltd. — one of China’s leading Internet data center companies — to build and manage its public cloud service.
Oracle is in the same boat as IBM. While its cloud revenue jumped by 50% for the quarter ending May 31, overall revenue dropped 1%.
With these revenue-challenged companies depending on their cloud businesses, the results of the ITIF survey don’t bode well.
But they’re certainly not the only ones facing the fallout…
America’s Loss Is the World’s Gain
According to The Guardian, some of America’s largest Internet companies are involved in the U.S. government’s mass data collection program: Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, Apple, YouTube (owned by Google) and AOL. They all stand to lose credibility, customers and revenue.
But their losses present a big opportunity for European and Asian companies to pick up the slack from the growing global cloud market.
A market that’s forecast to be worth $148.8 billion in 2014… $160 billion in 2015… and $207 billion in 2016.
In fact, Artmotion, Switzerland’s largest offshore hosting company, has already scooped up a big portion of the leftovers. Since the Snowden leaks, its revenue has bounced 45% higher. The description on its website: “State-of-the-art data centre situated within the safe confines of Switzerland, the country for confidentiality and rock-steady reliability.”
And who doesn’t want some confidentiality right now?!
Nobody knows exactly what the fallout will be for U.S. cloud companies just yet. As ITIF analyst Daniel Castro states, “Due to the clandestine nature [of the cloud industry] — Amazon, for example, submerges AWS revenue in a nebulous ‘other’ category, and Microsoft has buried Azure so deep in its balance sheet it’s impossible to get a rough estimate on its cloud revenue — making these predictions is difficult.”
But suffice it to say these companies are facing government-induced head winds, with a suspicious public reluctant to trust American companies with their personal data.
On a positive note, if untrusting users of public clouds seek the safer haven of private or foreign clouds, it could open up new possibilities for investors. I’ll keep you updated on any compelling opportunities that I dig up.
Ahead of the tape,
Louis Basenesefor Tomorrow in Review
Since the Internet boom of the 1990s, Internet infrastructure has not had a major upgrade in carrying capacity. Now, for the first time in more than a decade, we are on the edge of an immense spending cycle aimed at upgrading those “old pipes”.
A former Wall Street consultant and analyst, Louis helped direct over $1 billion in institutional capital before founding WSD Insider and Wall Street Daily where he serves as Chief Investment Strategist. In addition to being an expert on small-cap stocks, Louis is also well versed in special situations including mergers and acquisitions and spinoffs. His commentary has been featured in several media outlets, including MarketWatch. And he’s also a top-rated speaker at financial conferences throughout the country. A New Jersey native, Louis earned his MBA with honors from the Crummer Graduate School of Business at Rollins College. He draws upon both his academic and professional experiences to edit his short-term trading service: MicroCap Tech Trader.
Actually, an awful lot of damage was done back when the MPAA/RIAA puppet aka the “justice” department went after MegaUpload. The fact that the Feds arbitrarily shut down *everything*, including users’ access to their own property and data pretty much put the kibosh on trusting anything to the cloud. One guy who put his business data and property in (all legitimate, all his) is STILL fighting to get it back.
After the Snowden Revelations, the only real advice you can give in regard to “cloud computing” is: Trust NOTHING to “the cloud,” and that means anybody’s cloud.
Since the invention of the "shareholder rights plan" (i.e. the "poison pill"), most companies are relatively immune to hostile takeovers. But according to Dave Gonigam that could all change thanks to one activist investor. And if you're savvy enough, you may just be able to follow his lead for big gains. Read on...
As the markets have continued to rally over the last several years, more and more people have touted the problem of "income inequality" in the US. But as Jim Mosquera explains, this perceived problem will likely sort itself out with the arrival of one specific market event. Read on...
Almost one year ago, substation telephone cables were maliciously cut in San Jose, CA. In 20 minutes, 17 transformers were knocked out. A year on, similar threats have cropped up. Today, Addison Wiggin explains why these threats are so serious for the safety of the global economy... and shows you one way to play it...
The big problem with declaring bubbles is that it really does you no good. Unless you're attempting to measure and time market moves, you're also blowing hot air. But if you keep watch for negative divergences, you have a much better shot at figuring out big market moves than the latest bubble-busters. Greg Guenthner explains...
Too often investments are made in a vacuum. But as Byron King demonstrates, the global economic crash... easy money... and technological advancements are all interdependent. In particular, that connection has changed the investment calculus in the resource market. Read on to learn how...
Oil isn't the only resource to experience "peaks." Due to a major contraction in gold exploration over the past few years, the mining sector is no longer mining gold at its replacement rate. In other words, the amount of gold above ground is running out. And according to Henry Bonner, it will get worse before it gets better...