<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stealth Quantitative Easing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailyreckoning.com/stealth-quantitative-easing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailyreckoning.com/stealth-quantitative-easing/</link>
	<description>Economic News, Markets Commentary, Gold, Oil and Investing Strategies.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 07:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: geomguest</title>
		<link>http://dailyreckoning.com/stealth-quantitative-easing/#comment-18548</link>
		<dc:creator>geomguest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyreckoning.com/?p=17712#comment-18548</guid>
		<description>Is it literally accurate that &quot;The Fed bought it all BACK from the Primary Dealers.&quot;?  I thought the Treasury issued the bonds not the Federal Reserve.  I agree that it was quantitative easing but wonder about the stealthy part since anyone who wanted to know has found out what happened. Nefarious maybe, but stealthy is a reach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it literally accurate that &#8220;The Fed bought it all BACK from the Primary Dealers.&#8221;?  I thought the Treasury issued the bonds not the Federal Reserve.  I agree that it was quantitative easing but wonder about the stealthy part since anyone who wanted to know has found out what happened. Nefarious maybe, but stealthy is a reach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://dailyreckoning.com/stealth-quantitative-easing/#comment-18079</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyreckoning.com/?p=17712#comment-18079</guid>
		<description>well, that was one thing that I didn&#039;t understand when I read this in the newspaper:  how can a quarter million jobs lost cause the unemployment rate to drop?  Unless more than that many new jobs have been created.  But apparently there is some sort of recovery coming up soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, that was one thing that I didn&#8217;t understand when I read this in the newspaper:  how can a quarter million jobs lost cause the unemployment rate to drop?  Unless more than that many new jobs have been created.  But apparently there is some sort of recovery coming up soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

