Jeffrey Tucker

Politics is a lagging indicator of social-cultural trends. Politics doesn’t lead change; it chases it, incompetently and long after the underlying reality is impossible to deny. This is why it makes no sense to put faith in politics. By the time politics catches up, the rest of the world has moved on.

That said, I’ve just finished what might be the finest book ever written by a sitting member of the US Senate. It is daring. It is intellectually serious. It displays mastery of the subject matter. It makes courageous and counterintuitive claims, such as the need for across-the-board cuts in all spending, including military spending and middle-class welfare, by raising the retirement age. It takes on taboo subjects like the war on terror to call for normalcy and peace.

It is not a perfect book, and all political books have to be graded on a curve. But in all, it represents a fundamental and thoroughly coherent alternative to politics as we know it and have known it for half a century. Despite my best effort to view this as another political tract, I found the book invigorating and even thrilling in ways I had not expected.

The book is The Tea Party Goes to Washington by Sen. Rand Paul. It is his first book since he won the Kentucky race for US Senate, running as a Republican and delivering a crushing blow to his opponent despite amazing smears by the media and very little in the way of support from the GOP itself.

Is this book a harbinger of things to come, a sign that the prevailing political paradigm is collapsing or that the political world is beginning to adapt to the dramatic ideological changes present in popular and intellectual culture? There is no way to know. But I do know that it is highly unusual that a book this bold and heterodox would come from a US senator.

During Rand Paul’s run for the Senate, the media kept describing him as the Tea Party candidate. I’ve never understood this designation. “The Tea Party” seemed like a moniker attached to anyone mad at the system, but it didn’t describe a consistent philosophy. Tea Party rallies could feature speakers both decrying big government and also railing against Medicare and military cuts.

Anger is not the same as an agenda. So what’s up with these people?

This accounts for part of my skepticism on picking up this book. The book begins by explaining the term from his point of view. If he is right, count me in! But even if he is not right, I can now see why he embraced the Tea Party designation. It allowed him to distance himself from politics as usual, whether Republican or Democrat. It allows some degree of independent branding without the caricature that comes with words like libertarian.

He actually spends a substantial part of the book explaining that he actually is a libertarian; that he is the right kind of conservative; that he is a constitutionalist; that he counts the so-called religious right among his allies, but finds no role for the government in pushing religion; that while he embraces the radical traditions of thought of the libertarian idea, he still regards himself as a backer of limited government. If you want to start putting acid tests on his thinking in the book, you will note that he is mixed on the subject of immigration, he is silent on the drug war (but silent is better than endorsement), and he seems to hold out the possibility of some war-making role for the state.

If you are looking for a philosopher king, I would suggest other writers, most of them already dead. If you are looking for teachers, there are others who have a more-consistent outlook. But as statesmen go, Rand Paul is the obvious and natural successor to his father’s vision and political career.

He spends a good part of the book’s first third detailing the human side of campaigning and the sheer wickedness of the smearing press and what Joe Sobran used to call the opinion cartel of the American system of political coverage. Most famously, Rachel Maddow interviewed Rand as if he were a member of the Klan. Rand didn’t catch on that he was being sandbagged until it was too late.

All the details of this encounter are in here, all told in a very human way that provides an inside look into the consequences of daring to depart with convention in American politics.

Once you move past the inside-baseball beginning and the history of the campaign, you get into the substance of this book, and it is here that you find something that is actually extraordinary. This is a political biography that is also a serious and high-level manifesto against big government in all its forms. He begins by taking on domestic spending, blasting favored programs of the left and right, hitting federal regulation of American life in sector after sector, slamming the war on civil liberties in all of its manifestations.

So far, the book appears to be an outstanding presentation of the free-market side of the Republican Party. I’m not sure other Republicans have been this gutsy in attacking the Patriot Act, No Child Left Behind, bailouts of all sorts, and the like. In particular, he has great understanding of the boom and bust cycle and the role of the Fed in creating it. He cites all the right ideas in his interpretation of the 2008 crisis.

But what I found most impressive is his opposition to big government in the area of military and defense. This has been a sticking point among conservative Republicans since at least the mid-1950s, when it first became convention for the political right to back cuts at home and expansions abroad. Ever since the end of the Cold War, there was a chance for a corrective here, but it has been stubborn in coming.

To this day, it remains conventional for those who want domestic cuts to favor expansions of spending on the military — and it appears that the top of the ticket in this election will go this way yet again.

Rand Paul will have nothing to do with this. He makes the link between welfare and warfare.

  • “Like every aspect of federal expansion, the rise of our national security state represents government growth without end”
  • “The great irony is that conservatives preach individual responsibility and reliance domestically but practice policies abroad that create dependence on foreign aid and dependence on foreign soldiers… Though an integral part of the conservative creed is to question government, it makes many Republicans nervous to even hint at questioning our foreign policy…”
  • “There was a not-so-coincidental correlation between an ambitious foreign policy and astronomical spending that too many conservatives were willing to ignore because they had adopted the same utopian vision as the philosophically liberal neoconservatives.”

He goes on to discuss the foreign policy views of Washington and Jefferson, endorses the ideological vision of Robert Taft from the 1950s, and says that Pentagon spending ought to be treated the same as any other spending program. He even goes further to say that it is impossible to have reduced government at home without taking on the warfare state.

As for wars themselves, he says that he completely opposes the Iraq war. In principle, he backs the Afghanistan war, but then spends pages and pages exposing the graft and ghastliness of the whole enterprise, calling for an immediate end.

Even aside from whatever positions Rand holds on this or that issue, this volume actually contains important research from other sources I had not seen. He offers a startling quotation from Gen. Hugh Shelton, former head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. He reports that a White House official asked him, long before Sept. 11, if he could float a U-2 plane over Saddam Hussein’s military installations so that it could be shot down and precipitate a war. Shelton declined on grounds that he would not murder an American soldier.

All credit to Rand for reporting the incident at all!

More recently, he has taken up the cause of Internet freedom, opposing intrusive legislation that endangers digital rights. And while he has not come all the way over to opposing “intellectual property” as such, he has been a great opponent of laws that permit website takedowns and SWAT-team tactics against alleged infringers.

If these views end up making advances and triumphing over the leadership in the party, the apple cart of American politics will be completely turned over. No, I don’t hold out much hope that this will happen, and I don’t regard Rand Paul as the savior of liberty in our time. Nor does he believe that he is. Even so, this book is an excellent manual about the truth of government in our time.

It doesn’t give the whole truth, and his naiveté that government can be cut and contained, rather than completely dismembered, is frustrating for anyone steeped in the current radicalism of the liberty-minded world. Still, that a book this brassy and bold could come from a sitting member of the US Senate would have been unthinkable a few years ago.

Regards,

Jeffrey Tucker
for The Daily Reckoning

Jeffrey Tucker

I'm executive editor of Laissez Faire Books and the proprietor of the Laissez Faire Club. I'm the author of two books in the field of economics and one on early music. My main professional work between 1985 and 2011 was with the MIses Institute but I've also worked with the Acton Institute and Mackinac Institute, as well as written thousands of published articles. My personal twitter account @jeffreyatucker FB is @jeffrey.albert.tucker Plain old email is tucker@lfb.org

  • ken

    I would be very careful calling Rand Paul a Libertarian. When he recently expressed his delight in being a VP candidate for Romney,,, a well known neo-con,,, many were dismayed to say the least. To many libertarian patriots who worked to get him elected his credibility is now zero.

  • Tiredenoughtalready

    2010 Teabaggers get elected.

    2012 Teabaggers get un-elected.

  • tax payer

    The only american king – Bhumibol Aduladej is according to forbes magazine a billionaire, yet he pays no taxes to the IRS. Obama keeps talking about taxing these billionaires. He had 4 yrs already and did nothing.

  • Angelique Wow

    Nero fiddled while Rome burned.

    American politicians are fiddling while America goes bankrupt.

    Vote for clowns, get a government of clowns.

  • JayTe

    Rand Paul is not a libertarian. We have seen over the last six months that rather than following in the footsteps of his father, he is just another mainstream politician. His endorsement of Romney, voting for Israeli aid and there are other numerous troubling examples that clearly shows that he has embraced and been bought by the republican party. Like many of politician, he expressed one thing in his book and did the opposite once he was in a position of power.

  • Robb Moffett

    If rand paul will not work or vote to reduce immigration, then he is like all the other washington weasels.

  • http://www.set2survive.com Tim

    Kind of stupid to try to always live up to a label like libertarian. The man has ideas and can think outside the political label boxes. I’m glad he doesn’t have all the views of his father. I think I could support a presidential bid by Rand Paul whereas I couldn’t for his Dad.

  • Vote.Da.Bums.Out

    Vote for Republicans.

    Get clowns.

    Republicans have obstructed everything Obama has proposed to improve the economy.

    I have arrived at the conclusions that government just doesn’t work when there are too many Republicans holding office.

  • http://www.set2survive.com Tim

    I’ll bet you’re a Democrat :-). I thank God frequently that we have a Republican House to stop the spending madness of Obama. We are now at $16 Trillion national debt and still climbing.

  • gman

    “This is why it makes no sense to put faith in politics. By the time politics catches up, the rest of the world has moved on.”

    and that’s why so many megacorporations donate so much money to certain candidates!

    wait ….

  • gman

    “I have arrived at the conclusions that government just doesn’t work when there are too many Republicans holding office.”

    yeah, and that’s why california is doing so well! because republicans no longer influence california at all!

    wait ….

  • Clay

    Would I give up six of my silver Roosevelt dimes to read this book. I doubt it. If he belongs to the system, the damage is done! NO politician will get more than required by law from me. Send Rand your money, he and the rest of Washington need it! If you believe he really has your best interests in mind then talk to the other parts of Kentucky he does not represent. I understand a rail, tar and feathers have been brought up the times he has visited them.

  • http://www.booksbyoliver.com GreenLeaf

    Great & informative article. Thank goodness for the Internet to read the real news.

    The TeaParty is an undefined group of Americans that are not organized. By that, I mean they are individuals who are taking a stand for what they believe in.

    Here is another book that’s powerful though not well known about. ( booksbyoliver.com ) cause it’s also about Americans taking a stand so I recommend it.

  • Manny Phestoh

    Bill Bonner for President, Jeff Tucker for VP

  • For What Its Worth

    to “Vote da bums out” – I beg your pardon! That was the lamest statement that I have ever heard. For the first two years of his presidency, he had control of the House, the Senate and the White house and he still couldn’t get the job done (supposedly). The Republicans had little if any sway over him. Even now, the pretender in chief has the Senate so stop whining about the Republicans “thwarting” all of his “good and noble” efforts (as if tyranny is something to be desired).

    Yeah, let’s give the control to all of the Fabians, socialists, Marxists and Islamists already in his party and his administration. I am sure that will work well for the country!!

  • For What Its Worth

    Cicero couldn’t have said that any better.

    “A nation deserves its leaders” – Cicero

  • For What Its Worth

    To “tiredenoughalready” – Rather be a “teabagger” than a s***bagger….

Recent Articles

The Price Floor That’s Key to Gold Mining Profits

Matt Insley

Gold has had a rough go of it since the 2008 financial crisis. But according to Matt Insley, there is now a very clear price floor for the yellow metal. And what's more interesting, he comes to this conclusion by way of a glass of chocolate milk and Janet Yellen's actions from here throne at the Eccles Building. Read on...


Why You Should Tune-Out the Talk of a Tech Bubble

Paul Mampilly

The recent spate of new tech-based IPOs has a few prominent investors (Ahem... David Einhorn) touting the return of the '90s tech bubble. But there are some very good reasons why this market is nothing like the '90s, and why investors should be wary of any advice to the contrary. Paul Mampilly explains...


The Scariest Thing You Don’t Know About Generic Drugs

David Eifrig

Generic drugs are supposed to lower healthcare costs and provide you with another medical alternative. That's what it says on paper. But there's a real danger that goes along with these drugs. A danger even your doctor might not be aware of... Dr. David Eifrig has the full story. Read on...


An Unlikely Source of Dirt-Cheap Energy

Greg Guenthner

The solar panel turns 60 on Friday, but this birthday celebration will be unlike any other the industry has seen so far. In the past, solar energy's high price tag meant its wide-spread usage was nothing more than a pipe dream. But now, after six decades, solar power may finally be cheaper than oil and Asian liquefied-natural-gas. Greg Guenthner has more...


5 Min. Forecast
How to Profit On the Back of an “Activist Investor”

Dave Gonigam

Since the invention of the "shareholder rights plan" (i.e. the "poison pill"), most companies are relatively immune to hostile takeovers. But according to Dave Gonigam that could all change thanks to one activist investor. And if you're savvy enough, you may just be able to follow his lead for big gains. Read on...