Patrick Copeland

Do you know how much it costs to go to space?

It varies, of course, depending on what’s being sent and where, and what type of infrastructure exists that’s capable of getting whatever you’re sending to wherever you want it to go.

But just to give you an idea, it currently costs about $100,000 to send a standard 3-pound satellite into low Earth orbit. Larger masses can be a little bit more affordable, but can still cost up to $5,000 per pound.

But who cares, right?

That’s a great question. And the answer is everyone. Well, that should be the answer, and I’ll give you two reasons why…

First of all, traveling the cosmos is relatively cheap compared with the cost of actually getting off the planet. That costs a whole lot of dough, and all that money has to come from somewhere.

While it’s true that there are many privately owned space companies out there, there are still plenty of government programs sending people (and things) into space.

In a nutshell, that means when the NSA launches a satellite they plan on using to spy on us, they turn around and hand us a bill.

So reducing the cost of throwing chunks of metal into orbit could mean that more of your tax dollars go toward something you actually care about (but I wouldn’t get my hopes up).

Secondly, space exploration is vital. It’s the future of humanity. And as our presence and activity outside our own atmosphere increases, there will be a massive demand for supplies that we aren’t yet able to produce anywhere else.

Food. Water. Fuel. Building materials. Manufactured goods.

These kinds of supplies will be essential during the infancy of our forays into the stars.

And they’re all heavy.

Space Freight!

Lucky for the human race, there are smart people out there trying to solve this problem.

One company, HyperV Technologies Corp., has proposed a “railroad to space using a mechanical hypervelocity launcher to enable large-scale space utilization” that will be only one-hundredth of the cost of the rockets we currently use.

Fancy, I know.

They’re calling it the Slingatron.

The Slingatron is designed to work by “slinging” bulk payloads into orbit using a unique mechanical acceleration approach that can launch payloads at up to 7 kilometers per second, matching the velocity of vehicles that are currently in low Earth orbit (LEO).

If it works on the scale they’re planning, the end result will be a 100% electrically powered, land-based Earth-to-orbit launcher capable of hurling virtually any g-force-resistant payload into orbit.

The math to how it works is somewhat technical, but it basically uses a gyrating spiral rail (hence the train analogy) to harness centripetal force.

By placing the payload at the center and releasing it once the rail has reached launch speed, the payload continues to accelerate as it travels outward on the spiral arm until it’s launched, hopefully into space.

The technology is very promising, and even though they haven’t sent anything into space yet, the company has already successfully built and tested two prototypes, each a scale up from the last.

The Mark I Slingatron was the first demonstration of a spiral launch track, but still using a rolling sphere. They were able to launch a 1-ounce, ¾-inch-diameter steel ball bearing at 152 meters per second.

The Mark II Slingatron was the first attempt at a semi-modular design for launching a heavy sliding payload. With this design, they were able to launch a sliding, half-pound payload at 100 meters per second.

These are impressive results, if you ask me…

Right now the company is running a Kickstarter campaign to raise money for their third prototype, which will be used to launch a quarter-pound payload to 1 kilometer per second. This latest model will be the largest yet, and I’m sure they’re hoping its success will lead to larger-scale funding for research and development.

I, for one, am excited, not just about this idea, but about the face of the future in general. With all these people coming up with so many unique ideas and working so diligently, it seems inevitable that we’ll see a real expansion into space in our lifetime.

For more information on the Slingatron project, check out their Kickstarter page, below.

Here’s to the future,

Patrick Copeland
for Tomorrow in Review

You May Also Like:


3 Opportunities to Glimpse the Future

Martin Biancuzzo

Every year, MIT's Emerging Technologies Conference (EmTech) presents some of the world's most incredible technologies. This year, Martin Biancuzzo was there to witness it first-hand. What he saw may surprise you. But it will also provide you with the most incredible wealth building technologies you've never thought about. Read on...

Patrick Copeland

Patrick Copeland is a copywriter for Agora Financial and writes an editorial that is published in Tomorrow in Review. Before working for Agora, he worked as a freelance writer, writing mostly for the fitness and hydroponics industries.

Recent Articles

My Boots Don’t Believe In This “Bubble” Talk

Matt Insley

A debate’s been raging inside DR HQ. Is the shale revolution sustainable or was it just another credit bubble destined for an ugly bust? Our shorthand for the tussle is Bubble vs. Boots. In the “boots on the ground” corner, stands Matt Insley. Today, he says he’s setting the record straight on America’s oil and gas industry. Read on to see why he thinks all shale bubble talk is fear mongering…


An Indicator from An Advisor to Oil Trading’s “God”

Jody Chudley

Last week, our own Jody Chudley came across what the called "by far the most bullish chart for 2015 oil prices since the bottom fell out of the market". Interestingly, the chart came from one of the more credible voices in the business, Steven Kopits of Princeton Energy Advisors. Read on for the details...


The Irony of a Debt-Fueled Oil Boom

Wolf Richter

A report out of research firm Wood Mackenzie today estimated that U.S. oil and gas producers would have to cut spending by $170 billion to maintain net debt at 2014 levels. That won’t stop them from drilling for more and more oil, however. Wolf Richter explains the irony of the situation, below...