The Conference Board publishes various lists of Business Cycle Indicators. Those indicators are categorized as "leading," "coincident," or "lagging." This post will take a look at indicators 6-10 on the list of leading economic indicators. Indicators 1-5 will be covered in a second post at a later date.
Looking at the above chart, I find it hard to believe that anyone thinks the stock market is a valid indicator of anything.
Starting in 1960 and using a decline of 10% as some sort of leading indicator would have generated five false positives, one miss, and one success. At the start of the 1980 recession, the S&P was up year over year about 5%; at the start of the 1982 double-dip recession, the S&P was up close to 30%; at the start of the 1991 recession, the S&P was up over 10%; and at the start of the 2001 recession, the S&P was nearly flat. The S&P did not decline 10% before, during, or after the 1960 recession. As a coincident indicator, the results would have picked up 1982 and 1991, but would still have missed 1960 and 1980. In 1987 and 2003, the stock market declined nearly 20%, but there was no recession.
Just for fun, let’s take a look at the Dow Jones home construction index:
Did the above chart "lead anything," or did the index peak a month or so after the June 13, 2005, Time magazine Home $weet Home cover?
Time and time again I hear, "The stock market acts six months in advance." Six months in advance of what? I fail to see how it is acting six months in advance of anything. If one is looking for leading economic indicators, the stock market is surely not one of them.
Also note that if one wants a stock market indicator, the economy is surely not it. Look at the plunging GDP in comparison with the stock market for recent proof. Look at the homebuilder chart above for recent proof. Look at the historic S&P 500 chart for proof. Seriously, the S&P is a hopeless leading economic indicator, and the economy is an equally hopeless stock market indicator.
Yet the myth (and the weighting) that the stock market is a leading indicator still persists. It’s no wonder that nearly everyone is confused, given that nearly everyone is looking for correlations that simply do not exist.
This chart of the University of Michigan consumer sentiment index seems to have some merit as a coincident indicator, but little as a leading indicator, at least in the time frame for which this data is available. The indicator also suffers from what seems to be a high percentage of false positives per correct call. As a coincident indicator, it has three false positives and four successes. One could draw the trigger line differently to avoid the false positives, but then the big recession in 1982 would be entirely missed.
Seven out of the last eight times the annual rate of change on permits was negative 20% or lower, the economy went into a recession (not counting the current situation). Currently, the chart shows that building permits in November dropped 31% from the year-earlier level.
In all seven recessions since 1959, building permits declined year over year. Using the 0% line as a threshold would have picked up the recession in 2001, but would have also resulted in false signals in 1965, 1985, 1987, and 1996. This can be summarized as seven out of seven with four false positives.
Using 20% as the threshold, the only false signal was 1987, but there would have also been a missed signal in 2001. This can be summarized as six out of seven with one false positive and one miss.
This is actually a reasonably good performance, especially if one uses a cross of the 0% line as a strong warning signal while waiting for continued confirmation. Note that dips below the 0% line tend to occur well before the onset of recessions. Leading indicators are supposed to lead, and this one does. A crossover of 0% is a strong warning, and a continuation below the zero line shows that a recession is likely.
In "Money Supply and Recessions," I introduced "M’" (M Prime) as a leading indicator based on sound Austrian principles and definitions of money. Those who have not seen how or why I came up with M’ can click on the above link to see just what M’ is all about. What follows now is a recap of M’ versus M2 as a leading indicator.
Leaving the current status as unknown, six of the last six recessions were marked by a major dip in M’. Note how the indicator clearly led the recession. Also note that six of eight sustained dips below an annual growth rate of 5% in M’ led to a recession. On that basis, we have two potential false signals (1985 and 1995).
Unlike M’, the direction of M2 does not seem to give clear economic signals. Note that M2 was rising into the double-dip recession of 1982 and the 1991 recession. Also note that the single largest dip in M2 was in 1993, while M’ was soaring. The years between 1992-1995 are all problematic. Finally, note that unlike M’, where a dip below 5% annual growth was a huge warning sign, the dotted line above shows no such significance. M’ seems to be far superior to M2 as a leading indicator.
M Prime CPI Adjusted
On a CPI-adjusted basis, we see that there has been a recession on six of seven sustained dips below the zero line of year-over-year growth in M’. The 1985 excursion below 0% was extremely brief, in stark contrast to all of the labeled recessions, and thus can be discounted. 1995 is still a miss, but nowhere nearly as pronounced compared with M’ unadjusted. 1995 also happens to correspond to the start of a huge ramp-up in sweeps. Perhaps that is significant, and perhaps not. Nonetheless, M’ CPI-adjusted gives a cleaner signal, arguably calling for seven recessions, of which six happened.
The above chart clearly shows M’ CPI-adjusted to be a strong leading economic indicator.
M2 CPI-adjusted is certainly an improvement over M’ CPI-unadjusted. Note, however, that the 1982 and 2001 signals are not as strong as the corresponding M’ CPI-adjusted signals. The M2 adjusted signal for 2001 was particularly weak. More problematic for M2 adjusted versus M’ adjusted is the mass of Jell-O between 1988-1996. M’ adjusted was clearly giving an all-clear zero cross-signal by 1992, while M2 adjusted gyrated for years and did not really give an all-clear until 1998. Furthermore, M2 adjusted actually dipped back below the zero line in 1997, while M’ adjusted was soaring upward. Both M2 and M’ missed around the 1996 time frame, but even then, M2 did worse both in terms of an actual low and the Jell-O that preceded it.
10-Year Treasury Minus FF Rate Spread
A dip below zero preceded six of six recessions since 1965. Unfortunately, it generated five false positives, as well. Of course, one can set the line at negative 1, in which there were only three false positive. Or one can set the line at negative 2, in which case there was one false positive and one miss. Still, it would be much nicer if we did not have such curve-fitting. Can we do better than this indicator?
The Yield Curve
The above chart was generated by subtracting the symbol $IRX from $TNX where $IRX is a 13-week discount and the latter a 10-year yield. Ideally, both would be yields, but the difference is not that great on the 13 week. We use free data when available, and that data not only works well, it also happens to be free.
This chart is almost perfect. A three month-to-10-year inversion is six for six with one false positive in 1966. The current situation is considered unknown.
Note how the above chart does not confirm the false signal on the 0% line cross in 1995 on the previously shown real (CPI-adjusted) M’ chart. Unfortunately, the false signal in 1967 on this chart predates the beginning of our M’ series of charts, but I suspect there was nonconfirmation in the other direction, with M’ not confirming this chart.
Comments From Paul Kasriel
This post is an attempt to find a methodology that makes theoretical sense and works well in practice, too. Five of the 10 widely used leading indicators were reviewed, one of which should be discarded outright, one redefined as a coincident indicator, and one (housing permits) seen as valid as it stands. Two leading indicator components had substitutes that seem to work far better in both theory and practice.
The charts show that M’ and the 10-year minus the three-month spread are both superior to similar indicators on the list. As time permits, I will take a look at the remaining five widely used leading indicators. Thanks once again to Bart at NowAndFutures for providing many charts based on specifications that I requested, and also to Paul Kasriel at Northern Trust for his time and comments.
Regards,Mike Shedlock ~ "Mish"
January 15. 2007
Mike Shedlock (Mish) is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. His blog Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis includes commentary every day of the week. Mike is also a contributing "professor" on Minyanville. SPECIAL REPORT- The Endless PAYCHECK PORTFOLIO: In three simple steps, unleash a steady flow of work-free income... starting with up to 75 automatic "paychecks" deposited directly into your account.
Pingback: loans with poor credit
Pingback: I need air conditioner repair Sugar Land air conditoner http://youtube.com/watch?v=Z0rQAm4ZL8E&feature=youtu.be
Pingback: forex trading
Pingback: Get a Better Visual With Video
Pingback: Now Free
Pingback: carbon marcky
Pingback: marko man
Pingback: make your own puzzle
Pingback: kohls $5 off coupons
Pingback: makia julpo
Pingback: Bret Erdelt
Pingback: da Vinci robot lawsuit
Pingback: pre calculus help
Pingback: norges spilleautomater
Pingback: instagram followers http://www.buyfollowers.net/buy-youtube-views buy youtube views
Pingback: Real Estate License
Pingback: Asbestos Surveys Glasgow
Pingback: 1 man tents
Pingback: circle lenses
Pingback: bicycle team building
Pingback: You Could try these out
Pingback: donate clothing los angeles
Pingback: memory foam pillows
Pingback: telecharger minecraft
Pingback: mark mania
Pingback: chase online banking
Pingback: LEGO Marvel Super Heroes Movie
Pingback: how to get your ex back
Pingback: Navigate Upward
Pingback: Home Improvement Tips
Pingback: view video
Pingback: check over here
Pingback: click to view
Pingback: handy orten kostenlos
Pingback: Malcom Debaca
Pingback: universal remote
Pingback: РњРѕР»РёС‚РІС‹РїРѕРјР°РіР°СЋС‰РёРµ РїРѕС…СѓРґРµС‚СЊ. Р’СЃРµРіРѕ СЂРµР·СѓР»СЊС‚Р°С‚РѕРІ - 9693
Pingback: My Blog Title
Pingback: Kirk Englander
Pingback: Another Blog Title
Pingback: Bad Robot Surgery
Pingback: РўРµР»РµС„РѕРЅРЅС‹Р№ СЃРїСЂР°РІРѕС‡РЅРёРє Р°РїС‚РµРє РЅРёР¶РЅРµРіРѕ РЅ
Pingback: otc ed pills walmart
Pingback: click here
Pingback: Ruthie Cowdin
Pingback: special info
Pingback: Mignon Skiffington
Pingback: Jake Winnike
Pingback: Р РѕРґРѕСЃР»РѕРІРЅР°СЏ С„Р°РјРёР»РёРё РљРѕРІС€РѕРІ. Р’СЃРµРіРѕ РЅР°Р№РґРµРЅРѕ СЂРµР·СѓР»СЊС‚Р°С‚РѕРІ - 3121
Pingback: look at here now
Pingback: РџРѕРґСЂРѕР±РЅР°СЏ РґРёРµС‚Р° РїСЂРё РїРѕР»РёРїР°С… РІ Р¶РµР»СѓРґРєРµ РћР¶РёСЂРµРЅРёРµ 3 СЃС‚ РєР°Рє РїРѕС…СѓРґРµС‚СЊ
Pingback: Escorts in Las Vegas
Pingback: Eilene Dulaney
Pingback: Cyndy Silveira
Pingback: Granville Sartorius
Pingback: advertising campaigns
Pingback: online backup
Pingback: Weight loss calculator
Pingback: basement contractor springfield ma
Pingback: cras crashes compilation
Pingback: Joannie Comment
Pingback: biggest trucks
Pingback: Rogelio Breen
Pingback: deezer gratuit
Pingback: charlottesville property
Pingback: План побега фильм 2013 торрент Змо
Pingback: great college quarterback workouts
Pingback: zack childress rei success academy
Pingback: СЃРјРѕС‚СЂРµС‚СЊ РѕРЅР»Р°Р№РЅ РєРёРЅРѕС„РёР»СЊРј ZРѕРјР±Рё РєР°РЅРёРєСѓР»С‹
Pingback: Пятая власть 2013 онлайн ЖЯД
Pingback: Кадры 2013 смотреть в hd
Pingback: Фильм Жирафа смотреть онлайн в хорошем качестве BDRip
Pingback: Безумные преподы 2013 смотреть в hd
Pingback: Зажигание смотреть полностью
Pingback: Гонка смотреть
Pingback: смотреть фильм ведьмы из сугаррамурди cVU6
Pingback: how to get abs fast secrets
Pingback: Кинофильм Околофутбола смотреть онлайн в хорошем качестве
Pingback: Пятая власть смотреть онлайн в хорошем качестве | Новинки кино 2012
Pingback: Top cannabis seeds
Pingback: афиша гравитация
Pingback: Турбо 2013 смотреть онлайн
Pingback: Зажигание смотреть online всем тут бомба премьра
Pingback: Железяки смотреть онлайн в хорошем качестве
Pingback: Ломка 2013 смотреть в hd
Pingback: best shaving cream for men Singapore
Pingback: гравитация фильм 2013 трейлер
Pingback: План побега 2013 смотреть онлайн в хорошем качестве
Pingback: РџСЏС‚Р°СЏ РІР»Р°СЃС‚СЊ С„РёР»СЊРј 2013 РѕРЅР»Р°Р№РЅ РїС‘Р–
Pingback: Teds Woodworking
Pingback: youtube partner
Pingback: garcinia cambogia
Pingback: РҐРѕС‡Сѓ РєР°Рє Р‘СЂРёРґР¶РµС‚ РѕРЅР»Р°Р№РЅ 2013 Р•РЇРє
Pingback: Cloud Cushion For Tablet
Pingback: ed problems
Pingback: VigRX Plus Reviews
Pingback: pump for ed
Pingback: supplements for ed
Pingback: ed help
Pingback: Друзья друзей ЫбС
Pingback: muse ed
Pingback: ed treatment options
Pingback: King james bible app
Pingback: Payday Loans
Pingback: symptoms of ed
Pingback: how to drive traffic to your website
Pingback: Biological Dentistry
Pingback: Co Wholesaling
Pingback: Sell My House Fast
Pingback: Compare hotel prices
Pingback: karen millen online
Pingback: laser therapy
Pingback: how to fix ed
Pingback: drugs for ed
Pingback: Search Engine Optimization Irvine
Pingback: dörner und dorner immobilien
Pingback: Online Video Marketing
Pingback: Janesville drain cleaning
Pingback: ed treatments
Pingback: flipping houses books
Pingback: natural ed cures
Pingback: Bedtime Stories Online
Pingback: list building
Pingback: Vaginal Tightening Pills
Pingback: buy custom logo design
Pingback: California Jumbo Mortgage Rates
Pingback: plantar fasciitis
Pingback: Chicago SEO Agency
Pingback: Chesapeake house training
Pingback: social bookmarking
Pingback: lon rosen los angeles dodgers
Pingback: Get fit
Pingback: ipad mini accessories apple
Pingback: Cure for impotence
Pingback: РєРёРЅРѕ Р“СЂСЏР·СЊ СЃРјРѕС‚СЂРµС‚СЊ РѕРЅР»Р°Р№РЅ РѕС‚Р«
Pingback: Gadai Jaminan BPKB Mobil
Pingback: hair extensions
Pingback: ed treatment
Pingback: яндекс Невероятная жизнь Уолтера Митти ЧэЙ
Pingback: Guitar Repair
Pingback: Джек Райан: Теория хаоса фильмы 2013 смотреть онлайн ЮёО
Pingback: escorts in las vegas
Pingback: Pharmacy Tech License
Pingback: ham radio3k
Pingback: visco crown pt 13 inch memory foam
Pingback: stop foreclosure Calgary
Pingback: Healthy dinners
Pingback: Binaural Beats Brainwaves
Pingback: Bo Zou
Pingback: best web directory software
Pingback: online business ideas
Pingback: google pagerank
Pingback: best laptops
Pingback: affiliate management
Pingback: Dating Tester
Pingback: lon rosen linkedin
Pingback: locksmiths buffalo ny
Pingback: ÎµÏ…Ï‡ÎµÏ„Î®ÏÎ¹Î± ÎºÎ¬ÏÏ„Î±
Pingback: related site
Pingback: FF14 ã‚®ãƒ«
Pingback: FIFA 14 coins XBOX 360
Pingback: accident attorney austin
Pingback: Diablo 3 RMT
Pingback: Highster mobile review
Pingback: water conditioning orange county
Pingback: lakeville 4 bedroom
Pingback: online photography courses
Pingback: How to make wine
Pingback: read the full info here
Pingback: Click here
Pingback: play fancypants3
Pingback: Elder Scrolls Online Gold
Pingback: big trucks
Pingback: great company
Pingback: æˆ¦å›½ãƒ†ãƒ³ã‚«ãƒˆãƒªã‚¬ãƒ¼ è‚²æˆä»£è¡Œ
Pingback: LOTRO Gold
Thanks to the tireless efforts of the Federal Reserve, currency in circulation is up $72.5 billion in the last year - which equates to $234 for every man, woman and child in America. And after rifling through his wife's purse yielded fruitless results, The Mogambo Guru has launched an all-out investigation to find his share. Read on...
With so much turmoil and political strife throughout the world, it can be difficult to realize how bright the future of technology is. Luckily, Stephen Petranek hasn't lost sight of that. Today, he describes seven important stories that will shape the future... and how a few savvy investors can make a killing in the process. Read on...
The Affordable Care Act creates a new health insurance marketplace (the exchange). But because of the great uncertainty about what buyers will enter the market and who will buy what product, the law creates three vehicles to reduce insurance company risk. John Goodman explains why this is such a dangerous proposition...
The biotech industry has dominated the market so far this year; and early investors in this sector have practically won the lottery. But with such an incredible run up, could this bull market be nearing exhaustion? Greg Guenthner investigates, and offers some sage advice for investors willing to take a chance. Read on...
Generally speaking, gold miners are bad businesses. They bury perfectly good cash in the ground and tend to issue lots of shares just to stay afloat. So when one comes along that actually turns out to be a good business, it's important to take note. Chris Mayer has found just such a company. Read on...