Matt Insley

Gold’s main fundamental relationship over the past 10 years has broken down.

It’s a rude awakening to gold holders. However, understanding this break in the trend is imperative for figuring out gold’s next move – up or down.

Today we’ll take an in-depth look at what’s going on. Avoid this gold update at your own peril!

“Most gold bugs won’t see it coming” says my colleague Greg Guenthner, editor of the aptly named Rude Awakening.

“Unfortunately for them” he continues, “many of these gold bugs will keep holding – tying to ‘hope’ the losses away – all the way to the bottom.”

Although he didn’t specifically come out and say it, I know Mr. Guenthner was referencing what I believe is the #1 fact that gold investors must know. That is, you can’t trust the most commonly-listed fundamentals for gold.

Luckily we’ve got a graphic to sum up what I’m talking about.

M2 Money Supply vs. Gold 2005-Present

You see, the seemingly unbreakable 10-year, fundamental relationship between gold and the M2 money supply is done-for. Now that we’ve given the long-term chart some time to shake-out, it’s clear that this is a game-changer.

Point being: the money supply is still rocketing higher, interest rates are abysmally low, the Fed is continuing to pile nearly $1 trillion per year into bond purchases and yet gold prices are floundering.

Gold, from a fundamental standpoint, is now on its own. We can’t count on any semblance of a relationship with the money supply. Frankly we can’t even count on supply and demand data in the physical space — even that’s been a crapshoot lately. In a moment I’ll tell you what gold we CAN count on, but first…

If you didn’t pick up on this trend early in 2011 or 2012, then 2013 was a staunch reminder that the good old days of gold fundamentals are gone. In regard to the chart above, the relationship between the money supply and gold, for now, is dead. You can’t say it any other way.

That’s the great part about analyzing the charts. You don’t need to get into the nitty gritty of quantitative easing (QE)… where the money is flowing… or what the new Fed Chairman Janet Yellen is thinking. Instead you can just look at the aftermath. From the chart above you can see that there’s a clear disconnect between a gold bug’s fundamental argument and what’s really happening – a costly disconnect for traders.

In the meantime, if you’re wondering what IS following the money supply higher, the answer is simple: stocks.

M2 Money Supply vs. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), Mar. 2012-Present

Over the past 5 years The Dow, S&P and Nasdaq have continued a steady move higher. Over the past 24 months these broad-based stock barometers have moved in near lock-step fashion with the Fed’s increased balance sheet.

Indeed, as the Fed continued to utilize its QE policies it was stocks, not gold, that have gained.

Back to our metal discussion, gold is on its own now.

On that note allow me to be clear: Just because gold decoupled from its fundamental relationship doesn’t mean it’s automatically headed lower. No, this does NOT guarantee gold’s demise. Rather, it’s an important factor you MUST consider when investing in gold or gold shares.

You can’t just look at the skyrocketing money supply and assume gold is headed higher.

Same goes with some of the other fundamentals we’ve followed in these pages. Sure, you can tally the physical gold buying world-over, the easy money policies in the U.S. , check your favorite “overbought/oversold” indicators or even look at the U.S. dollar index as an inverse indicator – but over the past 12-24 months none of them would have done us a lick of good.

The single factor that we can count on going forward is simple price action. Until we can latch on to the next meaningful fundamental trend, we’ll have to keep a keen eye on price targets, support and resistance.

The most recent level of important support is the $1,200-level. For gold to make a leap higher we’ll have to see continued support above this level. If gold breaks to the downside – no matter what happens in the fundamentals (!)—we could be in for a rocky road.

To steal a term from Mr. Guenthner above, in the short-term we won’t be able to “hope” the losses away. Keep an eye on prices and beware of latching on to fundamentals – it could prove to be our best advice for the coming year.

Keep your boots muddy,

Matt Insley
for The Daily Reckoning

Ed. Note: What the market has in store for the gold price in 2014 is still too soon to tell. But Matt certainly offers some sage advice. And in today’s Daily Resource Hunter he offered his readers even more than that… They were treated to no less than 3 chances to discover specific, actionable investment opportunities. It’s just one perk of being a subscriber of his free Daily Resource Hunter. Not a member? Sign up for FREE, right here. Your next issue is just a few hours away.

Original article posted on Daily Resource Hunter

You May Also Like:


The Mogambo Guru’s Lifetime Income Equation

Richard Daughty

After a two-year hiatus, the Mogambo Guru makes his triumphant return to the pages of The Daily Reckoning. No one knows what prompted his reemergence, but he's no less angry than he was before he left. In his first appearance back he takes on Alan Greenspan, the ballooning US debt and some guy named Jerry. Read on...

Matt Insley

Matt Insley is the managing editor of The Daily Resource Hunter and now the co-editor of Real Wealth Trader and Outstanding Investments. Matt is the Agora Financial in-house specialist on commodities and natural resources. He holds a degree from the University of Maryland with a double major in Business and Environmental Economics. Although always familiar with the financial markets, his main area of expertise stems from his background in the Agricultural and Natural Resources (AGNR) department. Over the past years he's stayed well ahead of the curve with forward thinking ideas in both resource stocks and hard commodities. Insley's commentary has been featured by MarketWatch.

  • prefan

    What this chart with gold and the money supply doesn’t account for is the ability of large financial institutions (such as JPM) and countries to sell gold that they don’t own in large quantities. Any time you have a market that is basically a Ponzi scheme, in this case involving many sellers creating a market for buyers of “paper” gold with nothing backing it, you have a ticking time bomb. When the bomb eventually goes off (who knows when, but it will), your chart is going to look very different and those institutions/individuals holding physical gold will see a sharp increase in the value of their gold holdings relative to the dollar. Think of what this market would look like if you couldn’t sell gold you didn’t actually own. There you go.

  • theblues77

    Yeah there is a huge difference between speculating on price of paper gold and actually buying physical. Right now the paper market is just a derivative scheme.

  • DangerFed

    Someone is eventually going to have to come up with a REAL gold price
    indicator which measures what the coin shops are actually selling REAL
    ounces for. My shop has a premium of $55 for Krugerrands all the way up
    to $75 for Eagles. While commodities like wheat can have 50 times the
    wheat contracts versus actual wheat production, I dont think gold and
    silver can be bought and sold the same way. We need a new gold price
    index.

  • http://www.streetsmartfinance.net/ Alexandre Mancini

    And what about the fed manipulating the price of gold?

Recent Articles

The US Debt Crisis that Will Never Happen

Chris Mayer

One of the most heated political battles raging across the western world is debt versus austerity. In the U.S. this debate reached it's apex in 2011 when the U.S. credit rating was downgraded by Standard and Poor's. In today's essay, however, Chris Mayer throws the debate out the window, explaining why he thinks a U.S. debt crisis will never happen...


3 Tips to Finding Small Companies With Huge Potential

Matthew Milner

Believe it or not, more capital for a company doesn't necessarily mean better returns for investors. In fact, in a recent study that dug through data from more than 200 acquisitions going back to 2006, they found a "sweet spot" for the most likely acquisition targets. And it's lower than you think. Matthew Milner explains...


Disruptive Innovation Will Change How You View Obamacare

Greg Beato

The Affordable Care Act dumped 2,000 pages of regulations into the health care sector, stifling any innovation that could have brought about real cost savings. But even with these obstacles, there are still people looking for ways to do things better and at a lower cost. These new technologies could be the key to fixing health care in America...


Why Old-School Tech Stocks Are Beating Social Media

Greg Guenthner

While many of the newer social media stocks struggle for gains this year, old-school tech stocks have become some of the best trades on the market. With the rare exception (Facebook is doing well—shares are up 26% year-to-date) the social stocks are in the gutter. They got off to a fast start in January and Februray, but ran out of steam in the spring. Aside from a few feeble attempts, few have posted anything close to a noteworthy comeback. Twitter, LinkedIn, and Groupon are all down double-digits year-to-date. Groupon—the worst performer on this short list—is down 47%. On the other had, the biggest of the big tech stocks on the market are helping traders pile up even larger gains right now. Greg Guenthner explains…


Video
Creditism and the Threat of a New Depression

Richard Duncan

In the 1960s, total credit in the U.S. broke the one trillion dollar mark...and since then, it has expanded over 50 times. But now, as Richard Duncan explains, the explosion of credit that's made America prosperous, threatens to take the entire economy down. And that could mean the return of another depression...