05/22/09 Washington, D.C. Yesterday…we ventured into âBubble World.â
âWhatâs going on? When will this be over? How bad do you think it will get? What can we do to turn this around?â
Members of Congress have the same questions the rest of us have. They read the same claptrap in the newspapers. They hear the same balderdash explanations from economists and federal officials. Theyâre wondering what is really going on.
Not that we know. But they asked us anyway.
We report to you today from the banks of the Potomac. Our old friend, Congressman Ron Paul, organized an off-the-record discussion with several other members of Congress. The subject was the financial meltdown…and the bailout. We were there to talk, of course, but we were more interested in listening.
âYou donât understand,â said a Senate functionary we met later, âthese people live in Bubble World. Theyâre protected from the real world by their staffs and by the system itself. You imagine that they would know what is going on. But they donât. They know less than we do. And theyâll be the last to find out. They are so busy meeting constituents…dealing with donors…working out deals with their political parties and supporters…and feeling like big shots…they donât really have any time to study the issues. So they count on staff and party committees to tell them what to say, how to vote…and what to think.â
Waiting in the corridor of the Cannon building, two men in grey suits walked by…we overheard this conversation:
âDid you vote ânoâ on that last resolution? You weâre supposed to vote âyes.ââ
âI thought I was supposed to vote âyesâ to cutting off the argument…as far as Iâm concerned weâve heard enough about Nancyâs problem with the CIA…â
âBut that wasnât about cutting off the debate, that was just technical…about allowing them to modify the previous vote…â
âWhat are you talking about?â
âI donât know…I didnât think it had anything to do with stopping all this gabbing about Nancy and the CIA…â
We take it for granted that members of Congress often donât know what they are talking about. But it is shocking to realize that they often donât know what they are voting on either. And neither do the voters.
The Economist reports, for example, that the measures put before California voters in a recent plebiscite were challenged…not by the courts, but by a grammarian. She claimed they worded it in such a way that it was impossible for a reasonably intelligent person to understand what they were supposed to mean.
Since the meeting was âoff-the-record,â we canât tell you who was there or what they said. We can only report what we had to say.
âLook…economies…and empires…go in cycles,â we began. We thought we ought to start with the basics, since we didnât know what they thought.
âGrowth…maturity…then, decline. Thatâs just the way it is. So in order to get an idea of what lies ahead you have to figure out where you are in the cycle.
âYou never know for sure, but there are tell-tale signs. The credit cycle, for example, has been on an upswing in the US since the Great Depression. First, there was in-store consumer credit as early as the â20s. There was some mortgage credit…and some margin credit for investors too. But during the â30s, the financial strain was so great that most people regretted their debt and paid it down. Or they defaulted.
âYou could get a mortgage back then if you put 50% down…and paid it off in full in 3 to 5 years. And then Franklin Roosevelt set up the FHA…along with Fannie Mae. And pretty soon, you could borrow 80% of the house price and pay it off over 15 years.
âMajor credit cards â MasterCard and Visa â didnât become widely used until the â60s. And then, credit began to rise more steeply. Total debt had been about 150% of GDP in the â50s and â60s…but it rose quickly after the â80s. By the 2000s, you could get a mortgage for 110% of your house price â an inflated price at that. And you could take 30 years to pay it off.
âAs for credit cards, hardly a day passed when you didnât get a new one in the mail…usually with a higher debt limit. Debt rose…and rose…and rose…up to 350% of GDP. And finally, the whole debt bubble blew up.
âYou have to remember that the US economy â in fact, much of the whole world economy â came to rely on more and more debt as a way to expand. At first, a fellow could borrow $1.50…heâd spend it and invest it…and it would lead to an increase in GDP of $1. But, as time when by it took more and more debt to produce more GDP. The fellow would borrow a $1.50…but then, part of it would have to be used to pay the interest on what he borrowed before. Eventually, it was taking more than $6 to produce a single ounce of GDP.
âYou can see that this wonât work for long. GDP is like national income. You canât have debt increasing 6 times faster than income â at least not for long.
âBut remember, the US economy depended on this debt-fueled growth. Without the extra credit, the economy would slip back…which is what is happening now.
âWeâve reached a turning point. The financial industry has blown itself up. It realized that all those credits it had, from people who didnât have the cashflow to repay their debts, werenât worth what they were supposed to be worth. Weâre now on the downhill slope of the credit cycle…and most likely, the imperial cycle too.
âWhat everyone wants to know is how long it will take before we have a genuine recovery. And then, everyone…everyone…seems to think that the government can stir up new growth by pushing more debt onto the public…this time, public debt. And get this…the feds are now adding debt to the system at a rate four times greater than the previous record.
âThey…you…are running a budget deficit of $1.8 trillion this year. Could be higher. How much in extra GDP do you get from all that extra debt? Well, thatâs a good question…because GDP is now going backwards. The latest numbers show output going down at a 6% rate in the US. And thatâs one of the worldâs better rates. Exporters â notably Germany and Japan â are doing much worse. GDP is falling 14% in Germany. Itâs going down at a 15% rate in Japan.
âSo, the feds are adding trillions in new credit (debt) and getting no GDP growth from it â zero…zilch…nada. In other words debt is growing infinitely faster than GDP.
âHow long can this keep going? No one knows. But one thing we do know is that the economy is not going to start up again and deliver good, old-fashioned, healthy growth. Weâre in the process of deleveraging. That is, weâre on the downside of a credit cycle. Weâre getting rid of debt, not adding to it.â
If weâd had todayâs newspaper in front of us, we would have pointed at the headlines.
âRecession Turns Malls Into Ghost Towns,â says the Wall Street Journal. Malls are emptying out because they were built for a world that no longer exists. They were built for a world where people increased their debt and their consumer spending far faster than they increased their real incomes. Now that people are cutting back on spending â in order to reduce their levels of debt â they can no longer afford to go to the mall. As a business or an investment, malls have got to be bad places for your money.
âThe private sector is not going to take on more debt,â we continued our explanation. âPeople know it doesnât pay. And theyâve got too much already. The private sector is not going to begin a new growth period until theyâve paid off, worked out, defaulted on, or shirked a lot of their present debt load. Weâve estimated that they need to get rid of about $20 trillion worth. And thatâs going to take time. And a lot of painful decisions by a lot of people. Bad business, investment and spending decisions need to be recognized…and fixed. Debt needs to be reduced.
âAnd thatâs why this downturn is not going to end tomorrow.â
If weâd had the mall example in front of us, we could have explained that a mall represents a kind of bubble-era investment that now needs to be restructured. After Americaâs industrial age was over, the country found itself with empty factories and warehouses. They were mostly written off and destroyed. Some were converted â into lofts and shopping malls. Now that the retail age is over, weâll have to find new uses for malls too.
âThis is going to take time,â we told them…and then we took a break to listen…and eat some shrimp.
The Daily Reckoning is your premier source for making sense of the news Washington and Wall Street generate. Each business day, The Daily Reckoning calls on its stable of world-class writers and thinkers to show you how to get ahead.
Start your 100% FREE subscription to The Daily Reckoning today and youâll get a free research report, âHow to Survive the Fall of Social Security.â Simply enter your email address below to get your free report and join over 495,000 worldwide Daily Reckoning subscribers!
We Respect Your Privacy and We will
Never Share or Sell Your Email Address





Bill,
Not bad for a Baltimoron, in fact the best article I’ve read on this matter in months! I’ve developed a formula to describe the current financial condition : 2+2=5(not!) Hey, I’m no Einstein, but it’s to the point. Keep up the good work,
Greg
My email is was misstyped
Mr Bonner, if only these elected officials had an ounce of your common sense we’d all be much better off.
Why didn’t you list my comment?
Hi Bill or whoever is interested; I have
The Answer to the USA Financial Problem
though I’m sure others have thought of this.
It only needs one law then “hands off” from the government; the market will take care of the rest.
The law:
The value of imported manufactured goods cannot exceed the value of exported manufactured goods.
This would operate a bit like the carbon credits:
Exporters earn credits and importers have to buy the credits off them before they can import an equal value of manufactured goods.
The fall out.
1. The money earned from the credits will go towards making the exported goods cheeper and hence more competitive.
2. Imported goods will cost more and hence will be competitive with home made goods.
3. The goods that are manufactured for export and home sales will have a double competitive advantage.
4. All the jobs that went overseas will be repatriated because the advantage will have largely disappeared.
5. Years of developed skill sets won’t be lost forever.
This alone will bring back manufacturing to the USA & Canada, it will raise employment and remove the specter of civil unrest.
More people earning will increase tax revenue and eventually restore stability.
If this violates some international trade agreement, then modify it.
Oh, one more law would be good:
Get rid of the Federal Reserve for good.
Regards, Alasdair Anderson. (acceptwhatis@gmail.com)
Awesome article, as usual! The US is in big trouble, no doubt. We need people like YOU in Congress. That KNOW what they are voting about. Thanks again for this great website.
People often tell me no one can know the future and that there are no certainties. That this is stated as fact, this certainty must be the only exception to the rule.
Inflation or deflation, growth or not I dont know anymore. I was certain 3 years ago that house prices would fall and gold would go up.
Did that mean I was a pessimist or was I optimistic I could turn a profit.
Now I know I don’t know but I am sticking with it. QE, deleveraging, mismanagement and the misappropriation of resources etc continue.
Things dont look good. I am not betting on economic recovery
Hi Bill. You talk about the end of the bubble era. What about the new bubble forming right before our eyes? The QE bubble…the government debt bubble…the printed money bubble? This has lifted markets in Asia by up to 70% from the bottom. Isn’t this just a case of money born in the US and other developed troubled nations flowing into economies percieved to be relatively isolated or prone to growth because of demographics?
The next and probably last bubble will be in feds telling you what to do and what to let. But the difference to other bubbles will be that this bubble of the worst of the worst first intruding into and then sucking up your individual, personal liberties won’t ever burst. Welcome to the brave, new world. Prepare.