They rush to sue everybody! The investment banks who were midwifes to the birth of FB into the public markets weren’t playing fair, they say. They gave their best clients more and better info than they fed to the public.

Well, what…you mean…could you be saying…that the insiders have an edge?

Well…duh…uh…

“The thing about this IPO,” said a friend at lunch, “was that the whole world was watching. That’s why this was so important. It showed everyone how Wall Street operates. Everybody got burned. And they blame Wall Street…because they can see that the pros were being only half honest. And the other half was incompetent.”

Yes, dear reader, our hunch seems to have been right. The FB launch was a disaster for shareholders…for Wall Street…and for the whole cult of equities that has ruled the investment world for the last 3 decades.

“…a six-decade passion for equities has come to an end,” reports The Financial Times.

“Stocks have not been so far out of favor for half a century,” continues the report… “with equity returns virtually flat for more than a decade, the incentive for investors to take risks by funding smaller, more entrepreneurial companies has declined — eroding a process that has traditionally given managers the flexibility they need to grow. Capitalism with less equity finance would follow a much more conservative model.”

In the US, pension funds allocated as much as 70% of their funds to equities 10 years ago. Now, they’re down to 52%.

Everyone is turning his back on stocks…at least, that’s what the FT says. And analysts are already comparing this FT article to the “Death of Equities” cover story in BusinessWeek in 1979…just before a huge new bull market began.

Relative to bonds, stocks haven’t been this cheap since 1956. That was the year when George Ross Goobey announced he was switching the entire portfolio of Imperial Tobacco’s pension fund into stocks.

Goobey turned out to be a genius. Stocks began a great bull market which continued, aside from a countertrend between 1966 and 1982, for the next 56 years!

And now a lot of people think this is another Goobey moment. Stocks are cheap, they say. Get ready for another grand bull market!

What do we say? Nah…

The problems are:

1) This ain’t 1956…this is 2012. The US is no longer on top of its game. It’s no longer in full expansion. It is slipping…sliding…burdened by high costs…zombie industries…and corrupt governments. Growth rates are low…lower than the rate of debt build-up… There is no reason to think America’s capital structure — either stocks or bonds — will become more valuable.

2) Stocks are not cheap. They are only cheap when you compare them to bond yields. But bonds yields are suppressed by a Great Correction…about which more below. In order to be absolutely cheap, US stock prices will have to be cut in half — at least. That would put yields and P/Es near where you can get a 5%+ yield and buy a dollar’s worth of earnings for $5…not $12. Then, stocks will be cheap.

3) Bond yields fall in a correction because people do not want to increase their debt levels; they want to reduce them. They also reduce spending…which lowers business sales and profits, thus making stocks less valuable, not more valuable. As the Great Correction intensifies (and it appears to be doing so now) we can expect stocks to follow the Japanese example. Japan has been in a Great Correction for 22 years. Its stocks have lost 3/4 of their value. They’re still down 75% — nearly a quarter century after the correction began.

Goobey moment? We don’t think so. It’s time to sell stocks, not buy them.

Regards,

Bill Bonner
for The Daily Reckoning

Facebook Fallout: A Lesson in How Wall Street Really Works originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas. Recently Agora Financial released a video titled "What Causes Gas Price to Increase?".

Smash! Crash! Crunch! Whack!

Fenders banged up. Radiators steaming. Tires flattened. Whee!

But here’s the most exciting scene in the whole show. Greece and Germany are playing chicken!

Greece presses down the accelerator and heads for Germany. “If you force us out of the euro, all of Europe will go up in flames,” say the Greeks.

“Oh yeah?” say the Germans, turning on the speed in their Mercedes, “ve’ll see about that. Ve haf airbags!”

And we watch. Wonder. Which one will lose his nerve? Or will they crash head-on?

Nobody knows for sure.

But nobody wants to have money in Greek banks…in Europe’s periphery banks…or even in euros…when they find out.

Yesterday, more money leaked out of Greece…and out of the euro. The euro fell to its lowest level in two years as “Europe braced for turmoil…”

One headline said Greece was making plans to withdraw from the euro. The Greeks promptly denied it…which reminded us of what they used to say in Soviet Russia: no rumor is confirmed until it is officially denied…

De La Rue, an English company that prints most of the world’s currencies, would not say whether an order for drachma had come through or not.

Meanwhile, all these wrecks and smash-ups are damaging Europe’s economy. The New York Times is on the story:

Economic reports Thursday showed Europe’s prospects dimming as the long battle to defend the euro zone continued to undermine confidence and raised the prospect of a renewed cycle of demands for austerity.

The relentlessly bleak data, reflecting weakness across the Continent and in Britain, came a day after political leaders again failed to break the deadlock over how to resolve the European debt crisis.

A Markit Economics index that tracks the European services and manufacturing sectors fell in May to 45.9 from 46.7, worse than economists surveyed by Reuters and Bloomberg had expected. An index reading below 50 suggests the economy is contracting. In the first quarter, the euro zone economy grew just 0.1 percent.

Perhaps even more worryingly, German data released Thursday showed signs of a slowdown in an economy that until now had been a bright spot for the Continent. A Markit index based on surveys of purchasing managers of German manufacturing companies fell to 45.0 in May from 46.2 in April.

And Britain’s is worse. New data show the slump is worse than previously thought. The NYT again:

The Office for National Statistics revised the decline in gross domestic product in the first three months of this year to 0.3 percent, up from the 0.2 percent it estimated last month, because of a deeper slump in the construction industry. Construction output dropped 4.8 percent from a year earlier, the agency said, not 3 percent, as it had estimated earlier.

The revised figures were “bad news for UK policy makers as it shows the economy faring even more badly than initially thought,” said Scott Corfe, senior economist at the Center for Economics and Business Research in London. “Indeed, the latest data show the UK economy performing worse than the euro zone economy, which saw zero growth at the start of the year — meaning the UK’s woes cannot even be fully attributable to the debt crisis embroiling the Continent.”

So, stay tuned…let’s see what happens tomorrow…

Bill Bonner
for The Daily Reckoning

Euro Declines as Greece and Germany Play “Chicken” originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas. Recently Agora Financial released a video titled "What Causes Gas Price to Increase?".

I just saw a story go across one of my screens that said, “Greeks run university professor out of the country for telling economic truths.” I immediately thought, Good thing that doesn’t’ happen here in the U.S., for I would be a man without a country, eh?

Let’s get to the tape of what happened yesterday and what we can look forward to today. I left you yesterday morning with the thought that the tourniquet had been wrapped around the deep wounds the currencies had received from the dollar the previous day, and it looked as though a handful of currencies would gain on the day. Well, that thought carried through for the day, but the trading ranges were very tight.

The euro (EUR) is getting a weak wind in its sails this morning on news that German Chancellor Angela Merkel is leaving open a potential compromise on debt sharing for the eurozone. Confused? Don’t be! That’s what I’m here for! What this is saying is that even though Merkel has dug her heels in on this eurozone bond issuance idea that I talked about yesterday, she’s leaving open that option. And that’s a good sign, if you believe that a eurozone bond issuance, instead of each country doing their own auctions, would be good and help restore the eurozone and euro.

I think, though, that a true “eurozone bond” will continue to meet strong opposition from Germany. But there’s a compromise that could be worked out, and that’s a general eurozone redemption fund. So each country could retain their sovereignty and issue their own debt, but they would have to contribute to this general eurozone redemption fund, from which bond maturities would be paid. So you see this would very well calm the markets and allow the eurozone countries the ability to scale back their debt. Now, that’s a very good concept, and one that should have been hammered into the skulls of the eurozone leaders at the EU summit… but NOOOOOOOOO! They would rather talk about stuff that’s not going to work!

As longtime fans and first-time callers, you all know that I don’t believe that the Japanese yen (JPY) should be as strong as it is versus the dollar. I believe I’ve made that perfectly clear. But I’ve also said that you shouldn’t throw yourself in front of a bus either. Which is akin to trading versus a trend. And the trend in place right now is to buy dollars and yen. Sure, the Japanese government doesn’t like to see this yen strength, for they have set out to achieve an inflation rate of 1% this year, and they won’t get there with the yen so strong. (They won’t get there either way, who the heck are they kidding?)

But the trend is your friend, right? So yen strength is here for now. I threw in the towel on yen a month ago (remember?). I gave up using fundamentals on yen. It’s a currency on its own course. Oh, by the way, Japan’s latest CPI (inflation) for April printed at +0.2%. That’s a long way from 1%, BUT better than a kick in the shins for the Japanese leaders.

Yes, one day the “debtor countries” like Japan and the U.S. are going to feel the heat. Obviously, that “day” isn’t today, or next week, or month. but I do believe that the dog days of summer are going to return the heat to these two. Especially if stories like the one I have for you coming up after the break get some attention. We’ll be right back!

Well, what do we have here? USA Today yesterday (thanks, John Min) had a front-page story titled “Red Ink 4 Times Official U.S. Tally.” Oh, haven’t I told you before about how our government tends to stretch the truth when it comes to real numbers? And I’ve complained about the fact that the government doesn’t have to account for things like corporations, small businesses or even states! But there it was in USA Today. When using accounting that would put corporate heads into jail, the U.S. reported a $1.3 trillion deficit last year. However, when using accounting that everyone else in the U.S. has to use, the deficit was really, truly and officially — drumroll, please — $5 trillion.

Now, from 2004 to 2011, government deficits would actually be six times the government’s figure of $5.6 trillion.

I can hear the fans of the government style of accounting saying that you shouldn’t include retirement programs in the budget, because — and get this — “Congress can change what it owes by cutting benefits or lifting taxes.” OK, tell me when you think THAT might happen! Are you kidding me? That’s a pretty weak argument. There’s no political will to do what needs to be done. There’s no political will to cut the discretionary spending, which is chump change compared with the Medicare, Social Security and Medicaid expenses.

Onto something else, I feel like the boy who cried wolf — only I’ve been crying wolf for over a decade now! Of course, the problems with the dollar did occur, so some of my crying wolf has helped people. But this debt thing here in the U.S. just continues to grow and grow, sort of like my waistline the past five years.

The Swiss franc (CHF) continues to hold onto the 1.2010-15 cross to the euro, just keeping its head above water enough to keep from taking on water. At any time, traders could very well take out that 1.20 level, leaving the Swiss National Bank (SNB) no course but to react and sell francs and buy euros. And that’s why I tell people at conferences to steer clear of the franc. But what happens if the SNB has no resolve and the traders call their bluff? Then the franc strengthens and I’m wrong.

The Australian dollar (AUD), which on Tuesday was nearing 99 cents again and then experienced what all the other currencies experienced on Wednesday, is back on the rally tracks for the second consecutive day this morning. Maybe those measures we’ve talked about showing the A$ was oversold were correct. But then, in previous turnarounds by the A$, the bounce was more significant than what we’ve seen the past two days. So maybe there’s more to come? If near-term history since 2010 is any indication, that would be a yes, there’s more to come. But I’m not banking on anything from the past holding true these days, fundamentals having been thrown out the window with the bath wash.

Gold also has found its way to the green numbers for two consecutive days. I’ve got to say that the performance of gold (and silver) has been very disappointing this year. But people like Bill Bonner told us all that this could be the first year in the past decade that gold takes a breather, and if we had listened, this would not be so disappointing. And earlier this week, I told you what I believed about the price action from $250 to $1,200 and then from $1,200 to $1,900 and then back to $1,555. The year isn’t half over, so we could still see gold recover this year. But if not this year, then 2013 should be the year of recovery. I say that because I truly believe that the commodity bull market is not over. It has just taken a breather. The challenges to the global economy remain and will remain for years to come. This uncertainty will be the match that lights the fire. And before the legal beagles prepare to slap my wrists, that’s all my opinion, and I could be wrong!

The euro did bump up to 1.26 briefly while I was writing, but is back down a bit. This will be an interesting day with the thin volume in the markets. So be prepared for a wild ride, but then the past couple of Fridays before three-day weekends have been lackluster. So what’s it gonna be, markets?

I completely forgot to mention the incomparable newsletter writer Richard Russell, an absolute must-read for me. I’ve used so many of Richard Russell’s snippets and quotes over the years, you would have thought I would pull that name out without thinking about it!

And I actually heard from the Mogambo Guru yesterday! The Mogambo sent me an email. Longtime readers of the Mogambo Guru know how good he is with his descriptions of government blunders, so you can only imagine an email from him! Thanks, Richard… you are a real friend!

The Chinese renminbi (CNY) has been on a three-week losing streak as the Chinese government guides the currency weaker in an effort to keep their exports on pace to support the slowed-down economy. I’m not too concerned about this three-week move, which has only really been less than 1%. China left the renminbi unchanged for over almost two years during the financial meltdown in the U.S., and then they went back to allowing appreciation. We could very well see that again as the U.S. prepares to enter the backside of the financial hurricane. But remember, the Chinese want desperately to remove the dollar standard, and have publicly said so. They won’t get that to happen with their currency at current levels.

As I’ve told you many times in the past, the Singapore dollar (SGD) mimics what the Chinese renminbi does. So with the three-week losing streak in renminbi, so too do we have a three-week losing streak in the S$. But again, its loss during that three-week losing streak has been less than 1%.

Then, in keeping with my call that the U.S. is preparing to enter the backside of the financial hurricane, I saw this on ZeroHedge.com. You can always find stuff like this there:

“Here in the U.S., I think that The Bernank’s plan was to pretend they didn’t need to print more money, get commodity prices down and then hope that the economy would respond favorably to that development. This wouldn’t have negated the need for more printing; however, it would have bought time and allowed for a potentially lesser degree of action. Instead, what has happened is that the global Ponzi is completely and totally incapable of holding itself together without consistent and increasingly large infusions of central bank money. The debt burden is too large, the malinvestments too pervasive, the corruption too systemic. The whole house of cards that is the global economy will vanish into dust rather quickly without more and more printing. So what do you think they are going to do? If I am correct and the U.S. economy itself is now in the early stages of what will probably turn into a serious economic slowdown, then it will not be easily stopped with incremental central bank policies. The fact that they have waited this long and the fact that the global economy is in the midst of a serious slowdown tells me one thing. They are way behind the curve, and by the time they realize this, it will be too late to stem the momentum. That said, I do expect them to respond, and the fact that things will have gotten much worse than they expected will mean a major response. I’m not talking Operation Twist part deux. I mean a serious print. Potentially, the BIG ONE.”

See, I’m not the only person crying wolf on this economy. It makes looking to gold and silver as safe havens an interesting thought.

To recap: The calm that was in the currencies yesterday morning held through the day, and is still prevalent this morning. The tourniquet has been wrapped around the currencies and metals for now. There’s news out this morning that German Chancellor Merkel is open to a compromise on the eurozone bond issuance idea. Chuck offers up his idea of a compromise. The U.S. fails to account for its expenditures like it demands corporations do. Our deficit last year was really $5 trillion, as if the reported $1.3 trillion deficit weren’t bad enough!

Chuck Butler
for The Daily Reckoning

Accounting for the US Government originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas. Recently Agora Financial released a video titled "What Causes Gas Price to Increase?".

Charlie Munger, Warren Buffett’s partner in crime at Berkshire Hathaway, told CNBC recently, “I think gold is a great thing to sew into your garments if you’re a Jewish family in Vienna in 1939, but I think civilized people don’t buy gold. They invest in productive businesses.”

In a way, Munger is correct. Gold is uncivilized in the sense that it functions best when civilization functions worst. The more uncivilized a society becomes, the more civilized gold becomes.

So the easiest way to dismiss this statement is to say that maybe it’s 1939 again and maybe this time “we’re all Jewish families in Vienna.” But let’s not let Charlie off the hook so easily. Instead, let’s “unpack it,” in the words of our tutors at St John’s College in Santa Fe, New Mexico. To ‘unpack it’ we need to focus on two key words in Charlie’s statement: “productive” and “civilized.”

Charlie might be right if the world were, indeed, civilized. But maybe the modern world isn’t as civilized as he thinks. Part of what made the world so uncivilized in 1939 was unsound money. The abandonment of the classical gold standard in 1914 made the expansion of the Warfare state possible. The equally unsound system that emerged from World War I — including the Treaty of Versailles — virtually guaranteed that monetary and fiscal instability would lead to political instability. Radical parties like the Nazis flourished.

Gold, on the other hand, is sound money. You are not buying it for a capital gain. You are buying it, by our reckoning, as a way of preserving purchasing power. You extract paper from the fiat money system and turn it into something (bullion) you can later exchange for whatever currency emerges when the financial system becomes more civilized.

Interestingly, for more than a decade Berkshire has underperformed gold — the investment asset Buffett recently called “forever unproductive.”

Since 1997, Berkshire’s shares have declined relative to this forever unproductive asset. The nearby chart depicts the trailing 10-year return of gold since 2007. Thus, the first data point on this chart shows the return an investor would have received from buying gold or Berkshire Hathaway in 1997. Moving across the chart to the right shows subsequent 10-year time frames. Bottom line: Based on a 10-year holding period, there has not been a single moment since late 1997 what an investor would have been better off buying Berkshire Hathaway instead of gold.

No wonder Charlie is so cranky!

This lengthy underperformance by Berkshire may explain Buffett’s and Munger’s very vocal and public hostility toward gold. Or maybe that’s just a function of both men living most of their adult lives in an era where the monetary system was not disintegrating. They are unable to imagine it.

But the chart above isn’t an indictment of the investment acumen of Buffett and Munger. It’s an indictment of the world’s fiat monetary system! A civilized society with civilized people has sound money. An economy with sound money has price stability. This stability allows for long-term planning and investment. This stability rewards investors for identifying which businesses are the most productive and efficient users of shareholder capital.

For these exact reasons, William McKinley campaigned for President in 1896 and again in 1900 as a champion of the gold standard. He won…twice. But just 12 years after his assassination in 1901, the Era of Incivility began: The Federal Reserve came into being. Just 20 years after that, FDR confiscated all privately held gold. And 38 years after that, Nixon cut the dollar’s last remaining ties to gold, thereby establishing today’s very uncivilized “fiat money” system.

In an uncivilized society, where the value of your labor is stolen through inflation (made possible by an unsound money system) long-term planning and investment become much more difficult, if not impossible.

If you accept that we live in civilized monetary times where productive labor is actually rewarded, your brain has been tranquilized by the Big Lie of our times. Munger wants you right where you are. The less you think about how uncivilized the current monetary system is, the less likely you are to question it or disrupt it (which would be inconvenient for Charlie).

But if you live an era that subverts accurate valuation of productive businesses — an era that subverts the productivity of the economy itself by encouraging debt and consumption, owning gold seems prudent, not wacky.

Uncivilized times call for uncivilized investments.

Regards,

Dan Denning
for The Daily Reckoning

Uncivilized Investing originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas. Recently Agora Financial released a video titled "What Causes Gas Price to Increase?".

— Reminiscences of a Stock Operator, circa 1923

Poor Zuckerberg. He’s got all those Facebook shares. And they’re dropping in price. The stock closed a bit over $31yesterday…and then kept sinking… It was down to $30 in afterhours trading.

What did you expect? The company has sales of $4 billion. IF…IF…it were able to claw out a 10% profit margin…and IF a fair multiple for its earnings were, say, 10…the company would be worth $4 billion. Not $100 billion. Four billion dollars. And instead of having shares valued at $15 billion, Mr. Zuckerberg would have shares worth about $800 million.

The Dow itself was flat yesterday. Not a very good showing after so many down days. We’ll keep our ‘Crash Alert’ flag up. The bottom could drop out at any time.

The Facebook IPO looks more and more like the end of an era. The end of the pie-in-the-sky social network era. The end of the post-crisis recovery rally. The end of the public’s residual confidence in Wall Street. The end of America’s youthful energy…its era of growth, innocence and hope for the future.

Now, growth rates are low; they’ve been falling for the last 30 years. The baby boomers are neither booming nor babies. Stocks are passé…people want bonds now. And 63% of voters think their children will be worse off than they are.

At least Zuckerberg has it made. He’s got about 500 million shares and options. But every two dollars they fall costs him about $1 billion. So, he’s lost $5 billion since the company went public on Friday.

Still, we’re not going to feel sorry for him. He’s still got $15 billion or so.

Not that we care how much money he’s got. He could have twice as much; he’d still be a putz. We saw the movie!

Seriously, Americans care far too much about money. That’s what people who don’t have it say. They say that too much money is a sign of greed. And that people with too much money can’t relate to everyone else. We lose our sense of community…our public space. People with money live separately from the rest of us. They buy elections and use too much energy…and leave small tips. They’ve got too much power, too much influence, and too much of the pie.

Paul Krugman, Thomas Friedman and Barack Obama want to solve this problem by taking money away from the people who have it. And making it harder for them to earn more.

The guys at J.P. Morgan lost a few billion. You’d think the anti-money crowd would be happy about that. Instead, they want to make a federal case out of it. Practically every pundit is calling for more regulation. “If even good bankers can lose so much,” they say, “we’ve got to get control of them!”

The whole idea that they can regulate risk out of the system is loony. It doesn’t work that way. The more they regulate, the more they distort the market, and the more mistakes investors make.

Investors are buying US treasury bonds, for example, by the boatload. Why? Because the regulators at the Fed have taken the risk out of buying bonds. If interest rates rise, the Fed will buy bonds itself.

Dear Readers and connoisseurs of regulatory FUBARity will appreciate the flexibility of America’s central bank. Its aim is to drive investors into risky assets…by suppressing yields on “safe” treasuries. The unintended consequence is to create depression-like yields…and capital gains for bond buyers. Investors flee stocks…and go into the Treasury bonds the Fed was trying to get them out of. Thus does the Fed manage to bend its right leg far enough to kick its own derriere.

People who don’t like the rich should spend a little time thinking about how the rich got that way. Were they smarter than others? Greedier? Or just luckier?

In our humble observation, we’d say they were a little of all those things. But most of the big increase in wealth the rich enjoyed has come thanks to those same regulators whom the feds want to sic on them.

Yes, dear reader, the rich got richer because of the fixers…not because of the rich themselves. In 1971, Richard Nixon changed America’s money. The old money — backed by gold — flowed to the hardworking producers. It was saved, invested, and put to work. This new money had different ideas. It ran around in different circles. It preferred a different class of friends — bankers, money managers, investors, speculators, venture capitalists, derivative mongers, private equity operators…

You can see this shift illustrated in the difference between Mitt Romney and his father. The ol’ man ran an auto company. He made cars. That’s where the money was back then. He made the Rambler. Remember that? We had one. It was cheap. It was ugly. It ran. What more could you ask for?

But the son never made anything…but money itself. He didn’t run productive companies. Instead, at Bain Capital he was a leading member of the new class of people who fiddled with them.

By 2007, this class had gotten far too big for its britches. The whole capital structure began to wobble. Left alone, it would have crashed to the ground…bringing rich people down to earth with it.

Left to its own devices — without the generous support of the feds — the Dow might have fallen to 6,000 in 2008…and kept falling. And it probably would have brought down J.P. Morgan…and Goldman Sachs…the Bank of America and most of the rest of Wall Street. Even GM, which by then had become a finance company, would have gone out of business.

And today…there wouldn’t be nearly as many rich people to complain about. Problem solved.

Instead, the fixers fixed it so the fixees stayed fixed.

Hey…here’s another bubble…getting ready to blow up. Bubble bubble student trouble:

Student Loans With Over $1 Trillion are Likely One of the Next Hindenburg Zeppelin Financial Infernos

Barry James Dyke, author of The Pirates of Manhattan II: Highway to Serfdom predicts that student loans, in excess of $1 trillion, will likely be one of the country’s next financial infernos.

Federal student loans interest rates will rise to 6.8% on July 1st 2012 from their current 3.4% base if Congress does not act. Banking lobbies oppose any reduction in interest rates. If Congress does nothing, the average student’s $23 thousand subsidized loan costs will increase an additional $5,000 over a ten year period.

The author states, “Student loans are a form of indentured servitude as student loans cannot be discharged in bankruptcy. Student loans do not die with death. Collection agencies can call day and night to collect student loan debts. Garnishment to pay student loan debt is common. Students are not getting enough well-paying jobs to pay back these enormous loans, yet The Department of Education through the Department of Treasury can attach tax refunds to pay off student loans. What is more, our Congress drove the getaway car for academia and the banks in 2005 with the Bankruptcy Abuse and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 — which turned student loans into non-dischargeable debt.”

According to the Department of Education, two thirds of students who earn a bachelor degree use some type of loan to finance their education with an average loan of roughly $23 thousand. The New York Times recently reported that as much as 94% of students borrow to get a college degree.

The taxpayer underwrites roughly $105 billion a year in Title IV student loans a year, with $24 billion going to for profit schools owned by Wall Street asset managers. Student loans guaranteed by the taxpayer are a major source of revenue for the US higher educational system and if default rates accelerate, it could bring about a Greece like debt problem to the nation’s colleges.

“Excessive borrowing for an education will be a dark cloud hanging over this generation for decades,” claims Dyke. ”Default rates on student loans for traditional undergraduate and graduate rates are currently as high as 15.8%, and as high as 48% for for-profit colleges. The New York Fed reports that nearly one in four student loan holders are falling behind on their student loan payments.

Regards,

Bill Bonner
for The Daily Reckoning

The Delusion of Regulating Risk originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas. Recently Agora Financial released a video titled "What Causes Gas Price to Increase?".

The Dow rose 135 points. Not very impressive, after so many down days.

Everything has been sinking… Stocks, commodities, oil…

In Europe and emerging markets the damage has been even worse than in the US. Even China is slowing down.

It’s just like…well…a Great Correction!

And look at Facebook. We knew the Facebook IPO would cost a lot of saps a lot of money. But we didn’t expect it to happen so fast. We figured Wall Street would get a chance to squeeze the lumpen a little longer before they fled the market.

As it turned out, the mom and pop investors came into the market to buy Facebook and got whacked right away.

Here’s one completely un-savvy buyer quoted in The New York Post:

“I’m very psychic when it comes to stocks, I really am. I have no retirement, I have no pension, so I try to make money on the market.”

The press reported that cab drivers and plumbers were buying Facebook shares on the first day…for the wrong reasons, of course. One buyer had recently had his house foreclosed. He was buying the stock, he said, to help put his children through school. Good luck on that!

Colleague Justice Litle called it ‘Facebust!’ The hype sent shares up in early trading on Friday. The insiders who moved fast were able to cash out at over $40. But then, the selling overpowered the buying. Justice, writing over the weekend:

Countless idiots, er, optimists expected Facebook shares to pop 50% or more on their first day of trading, not taking into account the fact that, when EVERYONE IN THE WORLD has the same universally telegraphed notion as you — with ability to execute by mashing a mouse button — it is probably not the sharpest play.

At any rate, after a very anemic “pop” reminiscent of discount bin champagne purchased from a gas station, FB shares fell straight to the $38 level (where the IPO was officially priced).

At $38 the underwriter investment banks came in, vigorously “defending the shares” as a matter of business honor. Without the heavy buying of Morgan Stanley and others, for the express purpose of propping up the shares, FB could have seen a death spiral on its first day of trading. This would have forever marred said underwriters’ reputations, which is why it didn’t happen.

(Investment banks are paid a very pretty penny for bringing an IPO to market; one of the services they provide, in exchange for that fat payday, is propping up the shares, i.e. “creating a price floor,” with their own dough as need be, to keep the offering from looking like a dog. This is completely legal and sanctioned by the SEC.)

The Facebook IPO was a sort of psychological fulcrum point. It was perhaps the biggest public participation event of all time, in terms of getting “the man on the street” to take a flyer on a stock. When such tomfoolery works out badly, Joe Sixpack’s taste for risk — the mother’s milk of Wall Street — is that much further soured. (It should be noted that a whole raft of other “social media” stocks — Zynga etc. etc. — fell hard when Facebook came up short.)

In addition to the above, virtually every large mutual fund and long-only money manager on Wall Street felt compelled to purchase Facebook shares (for fear of missing out on “the next Apple” had they not).

If the Facebook hype fails, then — if the Maginot line of $38 price support gives way — it could have an incredibly demoralizing impact on the market as a whole, alongside the ominous “doom loop” that is Greece.

Such are the conditions in which “unease” turns to “maybe we should get out,” which then has a nasty habit of escalating to “GET ME OUT NOW,” acted upon by groupthink investors en masse.

And yesterday, the Maginot Line gave way…

“Market Up, But Investors Dump Facebook,” was the headline report from Reuters. The stock sold off…finishing the day down 11%. What happened to the underwriters, everyone wanted to know. The stock fell below the IPO price on its first full day of trading. Apparently, Wall Street was not willing to come to the rescue — not with its own money.

We had a hunch that Facebook might become the hinge event for this stock market. Shares had been selling off for two weeks prior to the FB launch. But the selling was orderly.

After so much selling for so many days, buyers are bound to come back. So the Dow went up yesterday.

But the FB hinge has creaked…and squeaked…and warned retail investors. They came in the door. They didn’t like what they saw. Many will take to the exits quickly. Others will stick around, until a growing sense of revulsion, mixed with losses, eventually pushes them out.

Ray Dalio calls it a “beautiful de-leveraging.” We don’t see the beauty in it. But we admire it for what it is — a natural and necessary response to the grotesque debt build-up of the last half century. It may not be beautiful, but it is doing its work as best it can under the circumstances.

Households are lowering their debt levels. Businesses are hoarding cash. The private sector, generally, is getting itself into better shape. All very natural…and all things in nature have a beauty, of sorts.

It doesn’t hurt that interest rates are so low. Even the price of gasoline is going down. In this sense, the Great Correction itself is helping…beautifully. The whole world economy is slowing down, lowering prices for energy and housing — two of the biggest items in the household budget.

The way to cut debt is to first cut expenses. Then, you have more money available to pay off your loans. And it’s fairly easy to cut expenses when interest rates are so low.

In 2005 and 2006 we advised Dear Readers to sell their overpriced real estate and rent. Now it’s time to reverse the procedure. At today’s rates…and today’s prices…it’s time to buy.

Here’s why:

In some areas, house prices are down 50%

In those very same areas rents have risen.

At 3% (which you can get on a 15-year fixed rate mortgage) your monthly mortgage payment might be only HALF your rent payment. So you can save money there.

Then, you deduct the interest from your taxes.

And then, the Fed gives you a bonanza when its monetary inflation finally turns into consumer price inflation…or even hyperinflation. Your mortgage balance could be reduced 10%…30%…80% in just a few months.

In other words, you get paid to wait for the feds to wipe out your mortgage!

Cut your expenses. Get into cash. Remember, our ‘Crash Alert’ flag is up. And a lovely correction is underway.

Tomorrow: how the vandals in Washington and at the Fed are defacing the “beautiful de-leveraging.”

Regards,

Bill Bonner
for The Daily Reckoning

Is Facebook the Rusty Hinge of the Stock Market? originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas. Recently Agora Financial released a video titled "What Causes Gas Price to Increase?".

Maybe the currency traders can also find their way back on to the right course, but I doubt it. I told quite a few people last week that I truly believe that this dollar strength that we’re seeing could last for most of the summer. But you know what happens at the end of summer, don’t you?

Ahhh, grasshopper, with the way we’re spending money that we don’t have, the U.S. government will be bumping up against the debt ceiling by the end of summer. And with this being an election year, don’t you think that the raising the debt ceiling negotiations are going to get even uglier than last year? I do, and if you recall last year, the dollar was teetering on the cliff during those negotiations.

For now, the dollar still holds the mighty hammer. Of course, I also told quite a few people last year that while the Australian dollar (AUD) has fallen from the lofty levels above $1, it’s still strong. Yes, that’s right, the A$ is still strong compared with where it was 10 years ago! Fifty-five cents — do you recall that?

Anyway, last week, I sent Chris a note to include in the Pfennig that talked about the A$ falling through oversold levels on the RSI charts, and how it had done that four times since 2010, and each time previously, the A$ bounced higher. Now there’s some more data that lead us to that same conclusion.

The IMM positioning last week showed A$ longs at their lowest level since the crisis. The last two times that the A$ saw positioning like this (oversold) was in July 2010, and in September 2011, the A$ experienced pretty significant moves higher in a relatively short period of time.

Now, after I’ve said all that, the A$ is down about half a cent this morning!

When I came in this morning, the currencies were holding their own, but they have slipped while I was preparing to write the letter. And gold is off $16 this morning. So I’ve got to find out what happened while I was preparing to write — inquiring minds want to know!

Well, the ratings agencies don’t seem to mind being late to the party, and Fitch is the latest to be late to the party in Japan. Fitch downgraded Japan’s credit rating and placed the country on negative outlook. Really? So what you’re saying is that you believe Japan has a problem? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! I can’t stop laughing!

Japan has had a problem for over two decades! But here’s my serious thought on this: The yen (JPY) might have weakened by 0.5% on the announcement, but I don’t think the selling of the yen has any legs, and it will stop soon enough. There’s just too much going on in the world right now, and as perverse as it might seem, Japanese yen is a safe haven.

Yesterday, I told you about how Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao, announced that China’s economy would receive stimulus. This news helped the emerging markets get their heads above water yesterday, along with the fact that oil gained back a buck on the day, which really helped the Russian ruble (RUB) gain back some lost ground.

The Chinese announcement also helped the Aussie and New Zealand dollars (NZD). I think, though, that today is going to be a tough row to hoe for the currencies, as the European Union summit begins tomorrow, and everyone believes that there is going to be a showdown between Germany and France, and this has got the markets scared right now, which is leading to the selling I’m seeing this morning.

France’s new Socialist leader wants to promote growth with spending. Germany had just about gotten every EU member to sign on to the “austerity is the best program” until France threw a spanner in the works by electing Francois Hollande. And now we’re going to have to be witness to all this drama.

But as I’ve said before, history tells us that, eventually, the German leaders can persuade the French leaders to see things the German way. But Hollande has to grandstand now, as he was just elected, although, in my opinion, it’s better to let your constituents down early in your term, so they have time to forget that you dumped on them! HA!

Yesterday, I told you about how I felt regarding Norway and Sweden getting tarred with the same brush as the euro (EUR), and that one day, traders would get it through their thick skulls that Norway and Sweden are not Greece! Norway tried to pound that thought in traders’ heads this morning by printing a stronger-than-expected GDP for the first quarter — 1.1% first-quarter growth is very good for Norway, given how the rest of the world has slowed. Oh, by the way, the consensus forecast was 0.9%.

I guess the Brazilian government and central bank win. They set out two years ago to weaken the real (BRL), and after multiple rate cuts, taxes and interventions, they have finally gotten what they wanted: a weak real. I told you about a month ago that it appeared to me that the traders had left town, and didn’t want to play this game with the Brazilian central bank any longer. That took away the support for the real, and the free fall has been quick. This is exactly why I always talked about buying the real only with the speculative money that you allocate in your investment portfolio. Crazy wild swings, and now this.

The unintended consequences… they are everywhere and in everything we do. Brazil’s leaders are going to soon find that the unintended consequences of their bashing the real into a weakling that gets sand kicked in its face is soaring inflation. And when the tourists begin to arrive for the World Cup and then the Olympics… oh, my!

Speaking of the Olympics, going back to the ’90s. We have always seen the host country get a bump in the currency as the Olympics draw near and during them. Spain was the first we tracked, and so on. So keeping that in mind, could there be a bump in store for the British pound sterling? That’s going to be a tough row to hoe, given all this dollar strength. But it will at least be interesting to watch, eh?

Yesterday, I made fun of the G-8 meeting and their silly attempts to make people think they actually accomplished something. I saw that Russian leader Putin said that the meeting wasn’t worth coming to. Did you know that there was only one truly trained economist among the G-8 leaders? Mario Monti of Italy. Now, that alone should tell you something about the meeting. The leaders were all throwing in uneducated ideas of what would work. Oh, boy, sign me up for the next meeting, eh?

I was asked by quite a few people last week about the Swiss franc (CHF). The franc is still hovering just above the 1.20 floor that the Swiss National Bank (SNB) put on the currency’s cross to the euro last September. It’s currently at 1.2011. The overtures from the SNB continue to ring out a song about how they want that cross’s level to go to 1.35 or 1.40. That would knock the stuffing out of the franc, folks. And with the euro getting weaker by the day, the SNB’s resolve will be tested soon enough.

I had a chance to talk briefly with James Rickards, author of Currency Wars, while in south Florida a couple of weeks ago. Mr. Rickards is convinced that all countries are in a war to reduce the value of their currency below their neighbor’s or trading partner’s currency.

I told him I hoped that wasn’t true, but at this point, how can you argue with him? But here’s what I took from the conversation and the book. That the U.S. dollar is going to lead the currencies down, which means the dollar will always be weaker than the other currencies. Maybe that’s taking a simplistic view of the whole situation.

Then I had a couple of readers send me this story, so it obviously is worthy! Did you know that the U.S. allows China to bid directly in U.S. debt auctions without going through Wall Street banks? Yes, it’s true! And China has the only central bank that’s allowed to do this. Reuters broke the story on this. I say good for both parties! And I would ask why are the other central banks of the world not allowed to do this? Why should Wall Street primary dealers get to make truckloads of markups on debt auctions to central banks? We should be rolling out the red carpet and meeting them with an adult beverage with an umbrella in the glass, when these central banks show up to buy our debt.

To recap: The currencies held their own yesterday and overnight, but the announcement by Fitch that they were downgrading Japan’s credit rating put the currencies on the selling block again early this morning. Gold is off by $16 this morning. The A$ has reached oversold levels on two different measures now. Chuck is looking for a bump here, along with one in pound sterling, should the “Olympic host country bump” for the currency hold true.

Chuck Butler
for The Daily Reckoning

Fitch Downgrades Japan originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas. Recently Agora Financial released a video titled "What Causes Gas Price to Increase?".

During the last couple of years, anxious Greeks have yanked a net €72 billion from the banking system — or nearly a third of total short-term bank deposits. And according to the scuttlebutt, withdrawals have been accelerating in recent days, as the “unthinkable” possibility that Greece might withdraw from the euro bloc has become increasingly thinkable.

So who could blame the Greeks for grabbing their euros before they turn into zeros…or, at best, drachma? In fact, given the chaotic conditions now unfolding in Europe, who could blame anyone for grabbing their euros before they turn into zeros?

Anxious Spaniards are also queuing up to withdraw their euros from the banking system. And many bond investors are behaving similarly: they are dumping Spanish government bonds and/or buying insurance against a default by the Spanish government.

You all remember Spain, don’t you, Dear Readers? That’s the country that, if it were an American high school senior, would be voted, “Most likely to follow Greece out of the euro zone.” Spain’s fiscal problems are not new news, but thanks to the renewed turmoil in Greece, distress has returned to the Spanish bond market.

As the chart above illustrates, the yield on Spanish government 10-year bonds recently touched a six-month high, while the price of insuring Spanish bonds against a default just hit a new all-time high.

That’s what we would call, no bueno.

Eric Fry
for The Daily Reckoning

Greeks Run on Banks as Euro-Confidence Wanes originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas. Recently Agora Financial released a video titled "What Causes Gas Price to Increase?".

Thanks to Chris and Mike for picking up the conn on the Pfennig while I was gone. The crowds that came to listen to me in Las Vegas were HUGE! And the group of EverBankers at the booth was great! Mike H., Dina, Luis, Mike B, Diane, Lauren and Jason! If you came to our booth, you we had you covered!

The old saying that they had on the desk about when I was gone, that the currencies would rally, came to a screeching halt. And that “perfect storm” for the dollar that I talked about at the end of last year is really flexing its muscles now.

I read this weekend that while the euro (EUR) has been quite resilient through all the bailouts of Greece, Portugal and Ireland, hedge funds don’t believe the euro can withstand the exit of Greece, so these hedge funds are blowing out of the euro at warp speed.

And when the euro is getting sold like funnel cakes at a state fair, the rest of the currencies’ chances of rallying are slim and none. Even the Japanese yen (JPY) can’t seem to find terra firma, although it remains strong.

Old faithful, the Chinese renminbi (CNY), is really wishy-washy these days. But remember what I told you a couple of weeks ago about the renminbi: In 2008-09, during the financial meltdown, when investors flocked to the dollar and Treasuries, the Chinese kept the renminbi steady Eddie versus the dollar, I wouldn’t be surprised to see them take that approach now, again.

A reader sent a note and asked me to explain why the Swedish krona (SEK) was performing worse than the euro. It’s unwinding the gains it made when the Riksbank (Sweden’s central bank) was in a rate-hike mood. As I’ve explained in the past, the euro is the Big Dog on the porch. All the other currencies are the little dogs. The little dogs can out run the Big Dog, (outperform) but not unless the Big Dog gets off the porch to chase the dollar down the street — the same holds true for when the dollar chases the Big Dog back to the porch!

I’ve talked about Norway and Sweden being tarred with the same brush as the euro, and that hopefully, one day — and hopefully soon and not far away — traders will realize that Norway and Sweden are not Greece! But until that day, we have this scenario to deal with.

G-8 world leaders met this past weekend, and they have all decided that the best course of action is to promote growth. Hmmm, sounds great! Global growth all around, eh? Ahem, how did they say they would promote this growth? Oh, they didn’t?

Hmmm. Now, that sounds about right for G-8. But to come out and make all these statements about promoting growth without a plan, unless you count more stimulus — that has been about as helpful long term as a broken crutch.

In China, Premier Wen Jiabao, said that more stimulus for his economy was coming, and when Wen speaks, investors listen. You see, China can dictate where the stimulus goes, and this gives them an advantage. We saw this in 2009, how the Chinese economy quickly reacted to the stimulus measures applied by the government and was the first to gain ground, while the rest of the world’s economies were still stuck in the mud and yuck of the financial meltdown.

Wen said that his government will give “more priority to maintaining growth” while continuing “to implement a proactive fiscal policy and a prudent monetary policy.” Sounds like central bank parlance for get ready for a truckload of stimulus.

At least China has the treasure chest from which they can dig into to get this stimulus. What’s the rest of the world going to do? Go deeper into debt? Spend to get out of debt? That’s been the mantra of the U.S., and they’ve finally gotten their message across to the rest of the world!

How many times have we heard U.S. Treasury Secretary Geithner tell the Chinese that they need to be more like the U.S.? Too many is the answer.

How about those U.S. Treasury yields? I bet you didn’t think, like I didn’t think, that they could go lower, but they did! Let’s see how well those low yields hold up this week when the U.S. Treasury has to auction about $99 billion of new bonds/debt this week, starting tomorrow.

And I had quite a few people last week ask me about gold (and silver, of course!). I told them that it was my opinion that gold’s rise from $250 to $1,200 was all about people realizing that gold was a store of wealth, etc. The rise from $1,200 to $1,900 was all about the “anti-dollar trade,” since the dollar has become the darling of investors again. As we saw in 2005, 2008 and 2010, the need for the anti-dollar gets reduced, and thus the price of gold gets reduced.

Sure, a lot of it has been “paper trades.” The price manipulators must be smiling like Cheshire cats. But that’s not all of it, folks. People are hopping off the gold and silver bandwagon as if they just found snakes on it! But I personally will not sell! It’s my personal opinion that these people jumping off the bandwagon are going to be sorry for doing so.

Today we have Fed head Lockhart speaking, and he’s been a proponent of more stimulus for the U.S. economy. Any kind of talk like that should be dollar negative today. But only slightly, as he’s just one voice.

It’s a pretty light week datawise here in the U.S. so the markets will really get to focus on the $99 billion of new Treasuries that will hit the street!

Then last week, Chris was talking about economic reports and how they had all looked a bit better than recent data reports here in the U.S. And I got to thinking: I wonder what John Williams over at Shadowstats.com would say about the economic reports. For years now, I’ve talked about John Williams and Shadowstats.com, but thought that new readers might get a kick out of going to the website and seeing what John Williams says about how the U.S. accounts and reports its data. It’s all lies and videotape!

To recap: The G-8 meeting called for growth… calling all growth, calling all growth! The dollar is in the driver’s seat these days, and that means the currencies and metals are getting sold like funnel cakes at a state fair.

Chuck Butler
for The Daily Reckoning

Hedge Funds Bail On Euro Now originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas. Recently Agora Financial released a video titled "What Causes Gas Price to Increase?".

If we move to Palm Beach, will we ever be able to visit our beloved Maryland homeland again?

The Financial Times reports that thousands of wealthy French people are now moving to London. Their motive? They want to escape the taxes proposed by France’s new president, Francois Hollande.

Should the French impose an exit tax on these “ex-patriots”? Should it then bar them from visiting France?

Of course not.

In England in 1215, the right to travel was enshrined in Article 42 of the Magna Carta:

It shall be lawful to any person, for the future, to go out of our kingdom, and to return, safely and securely, by land or by water, saving his allegiance to us, unless it be in time of war, for some short space, for the common good of the kingdom: excepting prisoners and outlaws, according to the laws of the land, and of the people of the nation at war against us, and Merchants who shall be treated as it is said above.

Here’s the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Article 13:

(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each State.
(2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

Article 12 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights incorporates this right into treaty law:

(1) Everyone lawfully within the territory of a State shall, within that territory, have the right to liberty of movement and freedom to choose his residence.
(2) Everyone shall be free to leave any country, including his own.
(3) The above-mentioned rights shall not be subject to any restrictions except those provided by law, are necessary to protect national security, public order (ordre public), public health or morals or the rights and freedoms of others, and are consistent with the other rights recognized in the present Covenant.

People should be able to move where they want, no? They should be able to look for lower tax places to live, shouldn’t they? After all, we’re Americans, aren’t we? Aren’t we all descendants of people who tried to improve their lives by moving to a new place?

Apparently, a lot of Americans don’t think so. Facebook is going public. And one of Facebook’s founders has moved to Singapore. He will save, by one estimate, $67 million in taxes by giving up his US citizenship. He says that’s not the reason he gave it up. But you can believe what you want.

And now the politicos are up in arms. Mr. Saverin has helped to give them an asset worth about $100 billion. Are they grateful? Do they bend down and kiss his derriere?

No! They want to tax him even more heavily…and prevent him from ever setting foot in the US again.

Yes, dear reader, there is no thought so dumb…so short-sighted…so low…that it won’t become the law of the land. Bloomberg reports:

Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., has a status update for Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin: Stop attempting to dodge your taxes by renouncing your US citizenship or never come to back to the US again.

In September 2011, Saverin relinquished his US citizenship before the company announced its planned initial public offering of stock, which will debut this week. The move was likely a financial one, as he owns an estimated 4 percent of Facebook and stands to make $4 billion when the company goes public. Saverin would reap the benefit of tax savings by becoming a permanent resident of Singapore, which levies no capital gains taxes.

At a news conference this morning, Sens. Schumer and Bob Casey, D-Pa., will unveil the “Ex-PATRIOT” — “Expatriation Prevention by Abolishing Tax-Related Incentives for Offshore Tenancy” — Act to respond directly to Saverin’s move, which they dub a “scheme” that would “help him duck up to $67 million in taxes.”

The senators will call Saverin’s move an “outrage” and will outline their plan to re-impose taxes on expatriates like Saverin even after they flee the United States and take up residence in a foreign country. Their proposal would also impose a mandatory 30 percent tax on the capital gains of anybody who renounces their US citizenship.

The plan would bar individuals like Saverin from ever reentering the United States again.

If Chuck Schumer has his way, entrepreneurs like Eduardo Saverin will think twice before setting up shop in America!

[Editor’s Note: After yesterday’s column, Run, Saverin! Run!r, we were delighted to discover that a brave Fellow Reckoner had actually linked to The Daily Reckoning...on Chuck Schumer’s Facebook page. Ha! Feel free to “like” our bitty missive here and to “share” it on Facebook. Call it non-violent protest. And of course, you can always “be our friend” here.]

Down, down, down…day after day… Stocks down. Yields down.

But what’s this? Gold rose nearly $40 yesterday.

Our “Alert Flag” went up yesterday morning. The Dow fell 156 points during the day. Not that there’s any connection. Most likely, after so many down days, stocks will bounce today. But watch out…

We have a hunch.

Facebook is the biggest deal in the stock market…perhaps ever. It’s a company that didn’t even exist 10 years ago. We know all about the company’s founding; we saw the movie. Twice. Because our daughter has a role in the movie. She’s the waitress in the scene where Zuckerberg means Sean Parker.

Not a bad flick. But from an investment standpoint, Facebook is probably one of the worst moves you can make. Most likely, it will be gone 10 years from now. $100 billion of market capitalization will disappear. Poof! It’s just a website, after all. We looked at a Facebook page, once… We couldn’t figure out why anyone would waste his time.

The trouble with new technology is that in a few years it’s old technology.

Here’s our hunch: The Facebook IPO may mark a major peak…and the beginning of a major bear market on Wall Street.

It happens every time. There’s a big, big deal. And then, it’s over. We’d give you some examples, if we could think of them. But we can’t. You’ll just have to trust us on this.

We don’t really have any evidence or logic to back this up. It’s just a hunch.

But our intuition tells us that when investors finally get the full Facebook treatment, they are going to be turned off by the stock market and Wall Street. Not only will the company turn out to be not worth a fraction of the IPO price…investors will also get a clearer picture of how Wall Street really works.

About that IPO… The idea is to generate a lot of excitement…a frenzy…so that people are eager to get the shares. And with all these Facebook users, who like…like…Facebook…and think they can tell a good investment when they see one…it ought to be easy to create a buying frenzy. Besides, everyone knows shares are intentionally priced below what their backers believe they can get for them. This causes the share-price to “pop” right after the IPO.

Of course, the distribution is tightly controlled. You have to be an insider to get IPO shares. Say…you’ll get them at about $40…and then, you expect them to go to $50 on the “pop.” If it works out as planned, you make $10 per share. This is a lot of money. Easy money. So, the insiders all want a piece of the action.

How do you get to be an “insider”? You have to be a friend of Morgan Stanley. Which is to say, you help Morgan Stanley make money. How? For example, if you are a pension fund or hedge fund you put through a lot of trades. Morgan Stanley makes money on the churn. You make money on the churn, too. Customers don’t make any money on the churn. They pay for every transaction. But who cares about them?

Everyone is convinced that buying…selling…and trading investments makes money. As long as the illusion lasts, Wall Street is happy. The customers are happy too…more or less. They’re participating in the Great Illusion — all trying to make money without actually doing anything.

So everyone churns. And the more you churn with Morgan Stanley the more likely you are to get an allocation of IPO stock. There could be about 50 million shares handed to insiders in this manner. Let’s say they go up $10 in the “pop.” That’s half a billion in gains …in only a few hours.

Dan Ariely explains:

Morgan Stanley and the rest of the investment banks involved will … make sure that their favorite fund manager client “friends” are given lots of free money. Assuming that these “friends” are given 75% of the total number of IPO shares, or a total of 291 million shares, and assuming that the stock does rise from $40 to $50, then these fund managers will collectively, in one day, make $2.9 billion dollars in realized or unrealized profits. That’s right, 2.9 BILLION DOLLARS.

…where and out of whose pocket does this money come from?

Well, just think of it this way… Let’s assume you own a very expensive piece of waterfront real estate, and you hire a broker to sell it for you. After exploring the market and after getting indications of interest, your broker advises you that $10 million would be a great price for your home. You meet with the potential buyers and decide to sell it for $10 million. After the $1 million commission you have to pay your broker, your net proceeds are $9 million. An hour later, you drive by the house and see your broker in the driveway shaking hands with some different people. You pull over to see what’s going on, and you find that the people you just sold the house to for $10 million are very close friends of your broker. To your dismay, you also find out that those friends just sold your (former) house to somebody else for $15 million.

The same exact game is going on here… By the time you drive around the block, these folks will have sold their shares at $50 per share.

I am not sure about you, but I find all of this very depressing.

Regards,

Bill Bonner,
for The Daily Reckoning

Expatriation in the Wake of the Facebook IPO originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas. Recently Agora Financial released a video titled "What Causes Gas Price to Increase?".