“In the event of hyperinflation,” warns Glen Bradley, who has sponsored one such proposal in North Carolina “depression, or other economic calamity related to the breakdown of the Federal Reserve System… the state’s governmental finances and private economy will be thrown into chaos.”

And with that we find ourselves in peculiar territory this morning.

We’re on a train to D.C. to meet with fellow conspirators — gentlemen from the ‘left’ and the ‘right’ — who share in the belief gold must be reintroduced to the global monetary system. It’s become an unintentional hobby of sorts.

The meeting is classified at the moment, so we’ll reserve comments for another time.

But our current mission is only part of what’s making us uneasy.

We begin today by briefly exploring what our line of work is all about. Scientists who’ve studied probabilities and plotted them on a chart typically find a bell-curve distribution — in which the most likely events bunch up in the middle of the curve.

But a funny thing happens out at the ends of the curve, where the rare events are registered.

“Scientists have found small bumps and bulges,” explains Bill Bonner. “Things that were not expected to happen very often actually happened more than they thought.”

“’Hundred-year floods,’ for example, happened every 88 years. ‘One in a million’ shots hit their mark every 700,000 or so. Statisticians refer to these odd bulges on the extremities of bell-shaped curves as ‘fat tails.’ Instead of tailing off as they are supposed to, the rare events seem to swell up where you don’t expect them.”

We are in the business of anticipating fat-tail events — while the “mainstream media” sit in the middle of the bell curve. Click the graph to enlarge and you’ll get the idea:

The problem is that since 2008, “fat-tail events” — like the collapse of the U.S. dollar and the dismembering of the Federal Reserve system — have become harder for us to stake out.

We were once derided as “doom and gloomers.”

Now doom and gloom has become downright fashionable. Heck, we see the National Geographic Channel debuted a show last night visiting survivalists in their bunkers… and here we are carrying on with business as usual in the “belly of the beast.”

With all that in mind, we daresay that declaring the mother of all financial bubbles might be passe. Don’t get us wrong: It’s still inevitable the bubble will pop.

But today we throw in the towel and make a concession: The monetary mandarins will successfully inflate the bubble a few months longer. And the peace we expect to break out once they’re defrocked of their power and prestige will have to wait for another day.

“The Federal Reserve Open Market Committee (FOMC) has made it official,” writes Daily Reckoning regular Charles Kadlec at Forbes: “After its latest two-day meeting, it announced its goal to devalue the dollar by 33% over the next 20 years.”

And that’s if everything goes according to the plan… based on the Fed’s now-formal target of 2% annual inflation.

Likewise, the Federal Reserve’s latest figures on consumer credit jumped in December — to an annualized 9.3% rate, on top of November’s 9.9%.

We’ve seen nothing like it in 10 years — not since the Fed poured gasoline on the fire first ignited by the tech bust in late 2001 made it possible for automakers to offer 0% financing.

Yes, student loans are a big part of the growth, as they’ve been for many months now. But auto loans are up big, and even credit card use is growing again.

The Wall Street Journal talks to a bank president in Colorado who says loan volume is up because more people now qualify and they’re willing to take on more debt.

The paper also profiled a couple in Pennsylvania financing a new SUV. “We had looked at our budget, and it was something we knew we were comfortable affording,” said Heather Davidson. They’re buying a 2012 Nissan Armada for $57,000.

Presumably they got every bell and whistle available, since the manufacturer’s suggested retail for the base model Armada is $40,275. But hey, why not splurge and trick the thing out? It’s easy payments of $650 a month for the next 72 months, the paper says.

Six years? Oy…

Addison Wiggin
for The Daily Reckoning

Of Fat Tails and Fashionable Gloom and Doom originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas.

We’ll get back to that in a second. First, our regular beat…

Markets went precisely nowhere yesterday. It was as if everyone agreed to stay home…or go fishing…or to become reacquainted with that strange person living in their house and sleeping in their bed. Among other things, investors are waiting to see what happens with Greece. We’ll save them some time. Nothing will happen. Nothing different, anyway. Here’s Bloomberg, with more news on the same old story:

Greek political leaders struck a deal on a package of austerity measures, clearing the way for a swap to cut the nation’s debt and win its second rescue in two years.

Greek Prime Minister Lucas Papademos called European Central Bank President Mario Draghi to tell him “an agreement has been reached,” Draghi said at a press conference today in Frankfurt. An announcement from Papademos’s office is expected shortly, a Greek government official who declined to be identified said today by telephone.

The accord came less than four hours before euro-region finance ministers hold an emergency meeting in Brussels to discuss the 130 billion-euro ($172 billion) lifeline and the swap that will impose a loss of about 70 percent for investors.

Oh, Papademos and Draghi said all’s well. An agreement has been reached. A deal was struck. Phew! We thought that…

…Wait, we’re trusting politicians now? Ex-Goldman Sachs politicians (in Draghi’s case), no less? When did that happen? These are people who couldn’t lie straight in bed. Everybody knows it. Notice, for instance, how these and various other furry-knuckled folk are no longer referred to as “politicians”? That word has been sullied. People have trouble even using it without nailing a “damned” or “thievin’” to the front of it. Now the papers, with embarrassing deference, refer to them as “political leaders.”

Let’s recap what we know about Greece and the euro-situation in general. For brevity’s sake, we’ll stick to its most recent — i.e. current — collapse only.

Back in May of 2010, five short months after receiving its first official credit downgrade, Greece was awarded a €110 billion 3-year “loan.” (We put that word in inverted commas just in case it mistakenly implies repayment.) And what happened? Did the government clean its act up? Did it cut expenses, as promised? Did the economy roar back to life? Of course not. Protesters had barely left their post in Syntagma square when it was time to return for more banner waving and foot stomping. By December that year, the yield on 10-year bonds had spiked to near then record highs over 11%.

Not to worry, said the Feds, who swept in with another €110 billion bailout plan…again negotiated under the strict condition that they rein in spending. But the horse had already bolted. Greece’s outstanding debt is now equal to roughly 160% of GDP. The gears have stalled. Official unemployment has reached over 20%. It’s worse for the youth. Much worse. Half of the nation’s under-24 population is without work. Growth has collapsed. Industrial output in December fell 11.3% from the year-earlier month.

Would you lend these people money? Would you lend these people your money? Only a fool would answer yes to the second question. Only a politician would answer yes to the first.

The Spartans are broke. They have been for a long time. And, as such, they will default. One way or another. All the handshaking, backslapping, hallway dealing, last minute brokering, politicking and brinkmanshipping won’t stop that. It’s just noise, playing like the soundtrack to a movie that’s already been written.

Not that the Greeks area lone sinners. The whole developed world is caught up in a debt funk. The collapse, when it arrives, is going to be truly epic. Which brings us back to our original thought: If you had the choice, would you live your life at any other time?

Take a look back through history. Most of it was a complete bore, save for the workaday melodramas played out in small, social soap operas. In fact, most of history existed before actual soap operas…and before soap…and before operas.

Sure, there were wars and plagues and the miserable collapse of empires. Currencies were debased and their masters beheaded. New lands were found and old cities forgotten. There were events that reshaped the course of history itself, delivering us the present day in which we live.

But mostly these things took many years, centuries even, to fully express themselves. Trends were slow…probably because there was nobody around to drive them. Mankind couldn’t even manage to gather a group of 1 billion people until 1811. How can you expect to get anything done when you’re still counting the global population in “millions?”

These days, contrary to the relative snoozefest of yesteryear, things happen. And when they do, they are fast…and loud…and on a scale that dwarfs any other in history.

Take economic output, for example. According to data compiled by The Economist, more than half (55%) of all the economic output generated over the past 2,000 years was generated in the 20th century. In other words, the last 100 years of the millennium produced more than the preceding 1,900. And this trend — along with the mushrooming population supporting it — is quickening. The first 10 years of this millennium account for roughly one-fifth of the total economic output achieved since BC ticked over to AD.

All this is just a fancy way of saying that big things are happening. Big booms. Big busts. Greece-, Europe-, US- and entire developed-word sized busts. And, lest we fail to mention it, a spectacle like no other in history.

Who would want to miss that?

Joel Bowman
for The Daily Reckoning

Watching the Greek Debt Episode of the Global Soap Opera originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas.

Yes…we’re going to Japan!

The gist of the Japanese situation is this:

The bubble burst in 1990. But rather than let their big businesses go belly up, the Japanese used every trick in the book. Counter-cyclical deficits up the Shinanho. ZIRP (zero interest rate policy). And QE too.

The economy didn’t grow. It didn’t collapse. It just got stuck…like a moth in amber. No new jobs. No new output. And get this, Japan is expected to lose 40% of its working age population by 2050.

But Japan is a leader, not a follower. Over the next 40 years, Germany will lose more than 30% of its working age population too. Russia and Poland will lose even more.

Growth is expected to be negligible over the next 40 years in Japan. But it will be almost nothing in many other countries too, according to an HSBC report. It estimates that the US will grow at around 1.5% annually. France 1.1%. Denmark, Norway, Sweden — barely anything at all.

What does this sound like to you, dear reader? It sounds like the whole developed world going Japan’s way — with low growth and high debts from here to eternity.

As in Japan, so in Europe and America. The European Central Bank is lending the banks as much as they want — at low rates. The Fed has its own ZIRP…which it says it will keep in place until 2014.

Growth is stalled…debts are mounting up. Hello Tokyo!

But wait…here’s the Congressional Budget Office telling us that Congress will have those deficits under control in no time.

“Deficits to fall sharply, US forecast says,” reports the International Herald Tribune.

What a relief that is! The CBO has crunched the numbers. It has beaten up the 2s. It has punched out the 5s. It has pounded the 6s. And now, finally, like prisoners at Guantanamo, the numbers tell us what we want to hear.

US debt is going down!

Wait a minute…are these the same number crunchers who, at the beginning of the 21st century, forecast federal surpluses as far as the eye could see?

Yes, it is!

But, okay, that didn’t work out exactly as planned. They crunched the numbers but then the numbers got un-crunched on their own. Damned numbers! You just can’t trust them.

So, how can we trust these numbers?

That’s just it, dear reader, we can’t. In order to work out as planned, they require:

1. Congress has to let the Bush tax cuts expire on schedule. Hmmm… Will that happen? Beats us. It probably depends on who wins the elections in November…which probably depends on what the economy does between now and then…which probably depends on more things than we can begin to estimate and compute.

But the central idea of it — that Congress will act responsibly — seems like something you can’t say with a straight face. Will pandas stop eating bamboo? Will teenagers stop slouching? Will liquor stores make free home deliveries? Nope. Everything has a nature of its own. And the nature of Congress is to spend money it doesn’t have on things it doesn’t need. And then to push the bill onto the next Congress…the next administration and the next generation.

2. Not only do taxes have to go up, so does economic growth. There’s a problem right there. According to prevailing theories, if you increase taxes during a de-leveraging spell, you don’t get faster rates of GDP growth. You get slower growth.

The CBO acknowledges this problem, to a degree. It allows as how unemployment may go up, thanks to the tax increases. In fact, they say it will go to 9% in 2013.

How will the President, Congress and the Fed react to rising unemployment? Mightn’t it tempt them to engage in a little more counter-cyclical stimulus…at the expense of the tax cuts?

And what happens to growth rates? The CBO figures that growth can outstrip deficits. Maybe. Maybe not. Now, it’s not even close. There’s a $1.1 trillion deficit this year. Growth? Maybe a fifth of that. In other words, debt is growing 5 times faster than the economy.

During Mr. Obama’s first (and maybe last) term, US debt will grow by more than $5 trillion. Another term like that and we’ll be over $20 trillion.

And already the weight of debt is pressing down growth rates…and it’s getting worse.

And if HSBC is right, US growth will be very slow. Will deficits also be very low? Below 1.5% of GDP? Down from over $1 for the last 4 years to under $225 billion for the next 40?

Heck, we’re as soft-headed as anyone. We’d like to see the whole problem go away too. And maybe it will…

But we wouldn’t bet on it…

Bill Bonner
for The Daily Reckoning

Debt Beats the Economy in a Growth Race originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas.

The ECB meets today to set monetary policy, and ECB President Mario Draghi will hold a press conference following the meeting, so we could see some additional euro volatility throughout the trading day. Draghi will definitely be questioned on the ECB’s possible role in securing a second round of funding for Greece. The ECB reluctantly entered the debt markets, purchasing bonds in order to keep rates from rising too dramatically. They have accumulated a substantial position in Greek debt, and the IMF wants them to agree to take a write-down on this debt in order to reduce Greek debt levels. The bonds purchased by the ECB were already at a discount, but Greece wants them to take an even larger discount on these holdings. The bonds bought by the ECB in its Securities Market Program are exempt from the current debt-swap deal, but Greece needs additional debt reductions, and the IMF is pressuring the ECB to write down this debt.

It will be interesting to see what Draghi decides to do, as many of his cohorts in the ECB aren’t interested in booking big losses on this debt. And if the ECB is forced to participate in the Greek debt write-downs, what will that mean for the other distressed debt that the ECB has purchased? It would certainly seem to set a precedent that the ECB would have to follow in dealing with other debt purchased through their QE efforts of the past year.

The data released this morning in Europe will give the ECB a bit of good news to start their meeting. Economic confidence in the euro area rose in the first quarter after posting losses in the previous two. The positive move was led by an improvement of expectations for the euro region over the next six months, according to the Ifo research institute, with the indicator measuring future expectations rising from 57.4 to 70.5. This is still under its long-term average, but a good move in the right direction. ECB President Draghi has said 2012 will be a “much better” year and, these data indicate many of the business leaders seem to agree.

The Bank of England will be meeting also, and many expect BOE Gov. Mervyn King to announce additional stimulus measures. Economists predict King will announce an increase of 50 billion pounds to their target for bond purchases, and some expect an even larger 75 billion pound increase. Growth in the U.K. has resumed (albeit very slowly) following a contraction in the last quarter of 2011. But King has indicated he would like to see stronger numbers, and doesn’t seem to be worried about any inflationary impact of pumping additional funds into the U.K. economy. The risk of slipping back into a second recession seems to far outweigh any future negative impacts of additional stimulus measures in the mind of the current BOE leader. With rates near zero, additional bond purchases is the preferred policy tool of the BOE, and an increase is being priced in by the markets.

At least one Federal Reserve president here in the U.S. would also like to see additional bond purchases. John Williams, the Fed president of San Francisco, said he thinks there is room for additional purchases of mortgage-backed securities by the Fed. “There’s only so much headroom to do further Treasury securities of a medium- or long-term duration. But there is more room out there in the mortgage-backed securities space,” Williams told reporters in California. Fed chairman Ben Bernanke said yesterday that he sees a “long way to go” before the job market returns to normal, and additional bond buying is one option that is still on the table. It makes me a bit nervous to be following in the footsteps of the BOE and BOJ in what seems like another round of QE.

No data releases in the U.S. yesterday, but today is Thursday, which means we will get the weekly jobs numbers. Initial jobless claims are expected to have increased to 370,000 from 367,000 last week, and continuing claims are expected to have risen to 3.5 million. This data may seem counter to last week’s unexpected drop in the jobless rate to a three-year low, but the reason for this drop in the big number is that workers are simply giving up looking for work. So while last week’s announcement of a drop in the unemployment rate to 8.3% sent stocks soaring, the rate doesn’t give the true picture of the U.S. labor market. Chairman Bernanke pointed this out in his speech to the Senate Budget Committee yesterday, saying the job market remains a “long way” from returning to normal.

China’s inflation unexpectedly moved higher in January, according to reports released yesterday. Consumer prices rose 4.5% from a year earlier, a number that was higher than every economist’s predictions. The rise in prices was partially due to a weeklong holiday in January, which increased the number of shopping days available for consumers to make purchases. The higher inflation rate reduces the possibility of further policy easing in the near term, but most economists are expecting inflation to cool in the coming months.

The hike in consumer prices in China is yet another indication that the Chinese economy is not headed for a meltdown. This is good news for the commodity-based currencies of the New Zealand (NZD) and Australian dollars (AUD), and both hit near-term highs yesterday. The Kiwi traded back above 84 cents for the first time since September of last year. A report released in New Zealand showed employment grew last month, albeit at a slower rate than expected. New Zealand employment rose 0.1% in January versus a median forecast growth of 0.4%.

The Aussie dollar’s recent moonshot stalled a bit yesterday, as the Greek negotiations stumbled. The AUD$ has been on a two-month move higher, vaulting from below 97 cents at the end of November to a high of 1.0845 yesterday. The Reserve Bank’s move to keep interest rates unchanged, and their positive outlook on global growth prospects, has given investors confidence in the Australian dollar.

The guys who read the technical charts say the Aussie dollar looks overvalued at the current levels and suggest waiting to see a pull back to $1.05 before making any additional purchases. Another story I read on Bloomberg suggests the Aussie’s recent rally will force the Reserve Bank to resume cutting interest rates as higher Aussie dollar prices will negatively impact Australian exports. I guess it is just additional proof that you can spin things any way you want. I still feel the commodity currencies are the place to invest.

Then there was this… On my drive to work this morning, I heard a newscaster saying how it was nice to see Congress finally coming together to pass an important piece of legislation. I wondered could it be real deficit reduction? Tax reform? Tort reform? No, it was the bill that would ban members of Congress from profiting from using inside information in trading stocks. Shouldn’t this be illegal already? In fact, it is, as members of Congress are not exempt from existing insider trading laws, but the Constitution’s protection of their “speech or debate” makes it extremely hard to investigate violations. A 60 Minutes report back in November showed some members of Congress, including House Speaker John Boehner and Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, had bought stock in companies while legislation that might affect those businesses was being debated. I guess it is good news that they are finally doing something about the loophole, but wouldn’t their ethics already prevent this? Oh, I forgot, I am talking about Congress.

To recap. The Greek leaders have been given 15 days to find additional cuts to offset pension costs. The ECB and BOE meet and both may be adding to their bond buying. The ECB has to decide if they want to take a haircut on their Greek debt. Chinese inflation pushed higher, causing a rally to the commodity currencies. And our Congress is set to pass a law which really shouldn’t be necessary.

Mike just pointed out a headline that the Greek parliament has come to an agreement on additional cuts which should seal the deal on a second round of funding. This should send the euro and the risk currencies higher today!

Chris Gaffney
for The Daily Reckoning

The Greeks are Given Another 15 Days to Find More Cuts originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas.

Here’s the skinny. The European Central Bank has made key concessions over its holdings of Greek government bonds that will contribute to a reduction of Greece’s debt burden. The ECB has agreed to exchange the Greek government bonds it purchased in the secondary market last year at a price below face value, provided the debt restructuring talks under way find a successful outcome.

The ECB won’t make a loss on the transaction, but it is not clear whether the bank will exchange the bonds at the below-par price at which it purchased them or whether it will make a profit.

I find this to be very interesting, as the ECB previously didn’t want any part of this trade. And once again, I point to the fact that I told you last month that there would some changes to the ECB’s stance and that some semblance of calm would come over the eurozone. Not that they are out of the woods by any stretch of the imagination. It’s just that calm now means that all the negativity gets drowned out, temporarily.

So the euro has stretched all the way to 1.3280 overnight. And the rest of the currencies are following the old Big Dog’s lead.

And gold really took off! The shiny metal gained back all it had lost the previous two days, as the flight to dollars and the so-called “safe haven” was reversed. I would really like to see gold have some real direction, though. It goes up $25 and then goes down $25. But I did look like the Mighty Oz yesterday when I said that that it could be a good move to buy some gold at the cheaper price.

I have a couple of things to go over this morning that just made my blood boil yesterday. If you’re not interested, skip ahead.

First, my blood pressure just began to tick higher and higher when I read “Congressional Earmarks Sometimes Used to Fund Projects Near Lawmakers’ Properties”.

And another.

And then this one regarding the Federal’s Reserve’s explicit goal, to devalue the dollar.

A friend of mine sent this to me and asked what I thought. I said, “It’s nice to see someone other than the Butlers, Rogers, Caseys, Gallands, Bonners and Wiggins telling people that this is happening and what it’s going to do the value and purchasing power of the dollar!”

Yesterday, Big Ben Bernanke told the Senate that Congress should focus for now on economic growth, rather than budget deficits. “Abrupt action to reduce the deficit in the next few months could seriously damage the recovery,” he said

Lawmakers are torn. The have the general public banging on their doors to cut deficit spending and they have the Fed chairman banging to promote growth. It’s like a devil on the lawmakers’ collective right shoulder and an angel on the left. Who will win? I bet you all know which one I would side with if I were a lawmaker, even if I didn’t get re-elected — because it’s the right thing to do.

I would tell Big Ben, “Look, buddy, you’ve cut rates to near zero and held them there for over two years and you tell us they’ll stay there for another two years. You’ve implemented two rounds of quantitative easing. The government has done “cash for clunkers,” tax rebates, stimulus and many other stupid pet tricks to promote growth. But as the two old ladies in the old hamburger commercial said, ‘Where’s the beef?’”

I would continue to tell him that I’ve decided to go another direction. I would find ways to cut the deficit burden and remove the shackles holding back small business.

But I’m not a lawmaker now. I was once an elected official of my little river town, an alderman. But then lost re-election by 1 vote! Then I found out that a lot of friends and acquaintances that would have supported my re-election didn’t vote, because they thought I would win easily. I decided then that lawmaking, even in a little river town, wasn’t my cup of tea.

The Chinese renminbi, (CNY) after seeing weeks of give and take in the value, finally pushed higher versus the dollar last night, to an 18-year high! Of course, the news regarding Greece had a lot to do with this move higher, but add to that that Chinese Vice President Xi Jinping is on his way to visit the US. When the Schumers and Grahams try to box Xi in a corner and badger him about China’s currency policy, Xi can simply point to the fact that the renminbi is at a 18-year high versus the dollar!

I have to mention the move that the Mexican peso (MXN) has been on for the past month. I’m not a fan of pesos, but they sure have gotten some wind in their sails with all the talk about the US economy recovering. That alone should make you want to back away from pesos, because if the US economic recovery is lacking terra firma, as I believe (as does the Fed, or else they would not be keeping rates near zero and laying the groundwork for more QE), the peso rally could be short-lived. But for now, it’s trading like it’s the new Pet Rock!

Another currency that has been very strong for some time now but looks to me to be very overvalued, the Japanese yen (JPY) is seeing some selling this morning on the news that the Ministry of Finance reported that Japan’s current account surplus for calendar year 2011 was the smallest since 1996. It’s still a surplus, but it’s dwindling away.

Yesterday, I told you about the Misery Index and how the US Misery Index had increased in 2011. A very astute reader mentioned to me that since I talk about John Williams and Shadowstats all the time, that instead of using the government numbers for the Misery Index, I would use the Shadowstats numbers. Very good point!

The US Misery Index goes from 11.30% per the government to 29% per Shadowstats. OUCH!

Remember a couple of weeks ago I told you about Byron King and his story about the US becoming energy independent? According to The Wall Street Journal:

“The US has reversed a decades-old trend of increasing dependence on foreign energy and is closer to complete energy self-sufficiency than it has been in nearly 20 years. Data from the Energy Department show that through the first 10 months of 2011, the US met 81% of its energy requirements from domestic sources.”

That’s great news! But then why is the price of oil still around $100? The cost to get the oil or natural gas out of the ground remains very high, and until those costs come down, if ever, the price of gas at the pump will remain high. In fact, I saw a story on HLN yesterday morning saying that gas would reach an average price of $4 a gallon by May.

To recap, the currencies and metals began to rally yesterday midmorning on rumors that the ECB was going to ease their stance on holding Greek debt. When those rumors proved to be true, the currencies and metals rallied even more strongly. Chinese renminbi reached an 18-year high versus the dollar last night, ahead of a visit to the US by the Chinese vice president. And the Japanese current account surplus is at the lowest level since 1996.

Chuck Butler
for The Daily Reckoning

Fed to Devalue Dollar by 33%? originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas.

But are gold buyers making a big mistake? Is history repeating itself? The New York Times suggests it is:

As it was in 1980, could it be again in 2012?

The 1980 presidential election was fought by a Democratic incumbent weakened by a poor economy amid worries that the United States had lost its ability to compete in the world. Gold prices had risen to unprecedented levels as the election approached, and the Republican nominee hinted he might propose a return to a gold standard.

That Republican, Ronald Reagan, won the election and soon appointed a commission to study the role of gold in monetary systems. To gold bugs, it appeared to be the best chance in decades to move the country toward gold and away from what they like to call “fiat money,” a currency anchored by nothing more than government dictates.

Last month, Newt Gingrich, seeking to widen his support in the days leading up to the South Carolina primary, promised that he would appoint a new gold commission. “Part of our approach ought to be to re-establish something Ronald Reagan did in 1981 and that is to have a commission on gold to look at the whole concept of how do we get back to hard money,” he said in a speech.

No, dear reader, history is not repeating itself. The NYT is wrong…about everything. Well, almost everything. It understands that gold is a threat to its big advertisers…and most of its readers (who don’t own any gold). It is also a threat to most economists — who have built their careers on not understanding how a real economy actually works…and whose income and whose professional status now depend on a gold-free, centrally-planned economy.

So, to prove that gold is a ‘barbarous relic’ and that gold bugs walk on four legs, they merely put the question to economists.

The University of Chicago last month asked a panel of 40 economists, including former advisers to both Democratic and Republican presidents, if they agreed that “price-stability and employment outcomes would be better for the average American” if the dollar’s value were tied to gold. Every one of them disagreed, some with more than a little incredulity that such a question was worthy of discussion.

“Why tie to gold?” asked [the very witty] Richard Thaler, a University of Chicago professor. “Why not 1982 Bordeaux?”

“Eesh,” responded Austan Goolsbee, a Chicago colleague and former adviser to President Obama. “Has it come to this?”

The Times goes on to report that “even economists with some sympathy to gold opposed the idea” of a gold-backed dollar. And Mr. Ben Bernanke, former professor of economics at Princeton, says he doesn’t think gold is money.

Oh yeah, replied Congressman Ron Paul, then why do central banks hold gold…and not things such as ’82 Bordeaux or diamonds?

Mr. Bernanke replied that it was just a matter of “tradition.”

Yes, he’s right…it is a matter of tradition, like marriage…like property rights…like government…like murder…like teenagers who moon adults out of car windows…or like drivers who give each other the finger.

Traditions become traditions because people keep doing them. And they keep doing them for reasons that aren’t likely to go away. Times change. Conditions change. Human nature doesn’t.

But let us go back to the New York Times’ silly notion that we are about to relive the period following ’80. What seems to have triggered the idea was Newt Gingrich’s proposal to study the idea of going back on the gold standard. Every right thinking person in the country — the Times implies — knows the idea is foolish. And the price of the yellow metal is sure to fall, as it did after the Reagan election, when people realize how foolish it is.

But gold didn’t fall after ’80 because the Reagan administration didn’t put it back in the monetary system. It fell because Paul Volcker made it unnecessary. Instead of printing money, Volcker tightened up…taking out some of the money that was already there. And he did it under conditions that were not merely unlike those of today…but almost the exact opposite.

Then, the US was still a creditor to the rest of the world, not a debtor.

Then, the US was still running positive trade balances, not losing money every month.

Then, US stocks were at bargain levels…selling for 5 to 8 times earnings; today, they’re twice as expensive.

Then, US bonds were cheap too…with yields for US Treasury debt as high as 18%, or nearly SIX TIMES as high as today’s long bonds.

Then, US households had debt of only 60% or 70% of their disposable income, not 120% like today.

Then, the Fed was determined to stifle inflation; now it is determined to cause it.

Then, the federal government’s debt was less than 40% of GDP. Now, it’s over 100%.

Then, even in today’s inflation adjusted terms, the US government ran a deficit of $197 billion. Today, the deficit is $1.1 trillion.

Then, stocks had been going down for the previous 14 years; bonds had been going down for at least 31 years. Now, stocks and bonds have been going up, generally, for the last 30 years.

This final point is now just a detail. It’s the heart of the matter. With bonds at a 30-year low, Paul Volcker could squeeze inflation…begin a 3-decade period of rising bonds (with falling interest rates)…and an 18-year bust in the gold market.

Will that happen again? Impossible!

What kind of strange history would it be if it could repeat itself…from totally different initial conditions? Could Napoleon march on Moscow…if he had started out in Chicago rather than Paris? Could Liz Taylor have married Richard Burton twice if she’d died in a traffic accident after her first marriage?

Can gold now repeat its path of ’80-’98, even though today’s situation is almost the opposite in every way?

No, dear reader, history doesn’t repeat itself. It just stutters out the same truths, over and over. G..g..g..g..gold is m…m…m…money. It says.

The N..N…New Y…Y…Y…York Times is full of s..s..s..s…

…error!

Who knows what the future will give us? We don’t. Not here at The Daily Reckoning…

…but we see what could be a bad moon rising. No, we’re not talking about a Great Correction…or even a Depression. Who really cares if GDP goes up or down? You can go broke with honor…with a sense of humor…and with grace and dignity. You can happily go broke.

But you can’t go to Hell with grace and dignity.

In the following article, the FBI notes that 18 people a year have been convicted, mostly of ‘white collar crimes.’ You wouldn’t think this would call for comment. But the FBI says these people are “extremists” who believe they have a right to protect themselves from what they see as an overbearing government. The G-men tell us that these extremists can turn violent “at the drop of a hat.”

How long before they’re rounded up? And maybe they’ll round up “potential domestic terrorists” too, even those who have never committed any crime? And what about gold bugs? They may look harmless, but they give aid and comfort to dangerous elements, don’t they?

Here is the FBI preparing the public for a trip to Hell.

(Reuters) — Anti-government extremists opposed to taxes and regulations pose a growing threat to local law enforcement officers in the United States, the FBI warned on Monday.

These extremists, sometimes known as “sovereign citizens,” believe they can live outside any type of government authority, FBI agents said at a news conference.

The extremists may refuse to pay taxes, defy government environmental regulations and believe the United States went bankrupt by going off the gold standard.

Routine encounters with police can turn violent “at the drop of a hat,” said Stuart McArthur, deputy assistant director in the FBI’s counterterrorism division.

“We thought it was important to increase the visibility of the threat with state and local law enforcement,” he said.

In May 2010, two West Memphis, Arkansas, police officers were shot and killed in an argument that developed after they pulled over a “sovereign citizen” in traffic.

Last year, an extremist in Texas opened fire on a police officer during a traffic stop. The officer was not hit.

Legal convictions of such extremists, mostly for white-collar crimes such as fraud, have increased from 10 in 2009 to 18 each in 2010 and 2011, FBI agents said.

“We are being inundated right now with requests for training from state and local law enforcement on sovereign-related matters,” said Casey Carty, an FBI supervisory special agent.

FBI agents said they do not have a tally of people who consider themselves “sovereign citizens.”

J.J. MacNab, a former tax and insurance expert who is an analyst covering the sovereign movement, has estimated that it has about 100,000 members.

Sovereign members often express particular outrage at tax collection, putting Internal Revenue Service employees at risk.

Regards,

Bill Bonner
for The Daily Reckoning

Why Gold is Money Despite Changing Conditions originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas.

Well, Dear Reader, we’re here to tell you: America is in decline.

We can give it to you straight because we’re not running for public office. And if we were elected, we would immediately demand a recount.

Anyone who tells you America is not in decline is either running for office…or not paying attention.

In 1969, more than one out of every three dollars of income in the entire globe was earned in the US. That’s what the IMF’s World Economic Outlook tells us.

By 2000, that number had fallen…but not by much. The US still took home 31% of global income. But in the last 10 years, the US share has fallen hard — losing more than 7%. Now, only 23% of the world’s income is generated by the US.

Ten years ago, China’s economy measured about 1/8th the size of the US. Now, it is 41%. Another decade and it will be the biggest in the world. It is already bigger by several measures. And even if its growth declines to 7% a year, it will still surpass the US in a dozen years.

Hey, don’t take it personally. The entire developed world is in decline — with America leading them all down.

By 2050, according to a new study from HSBC, today’s emerging economies — as a whole — will be larger than Europe, America and Japan put together.

The New York Times reports:

The American economy’s reported 2.8 percent growth in the fourth quarter, at an annual rate, was seen as mildly encouraging. But it meant that over the previous 10 years, the economy had grown at a compound annual rate of just 1.7 percent. Until the current cycle, there had been no similar prolonged period of slow growth since the Depression.

The International Monetary Fund’s latest forecasts indicate that there is not likely to be a pickup in growth anytime soon, either in the United States or other large industrialized countries.

…if the fund’s forecasts of 1.8 percent real growth in 2012 and 2.2 percent in 2013 prove to be accurate, the 10-year American rate at the end of 2013 will have fallen to 1.5 percent… But it will still be a little above the 0.9 percent compound growth rate in the decade from 1929, the year the Depression began, to 1939.

For Britain, which endured a horrible decade in the 1970s that led to talk of the “British disease,” the previous postwar low, not shown in the charts, was in the 10 years ending in the second quarter of 1983, an annual rate of 0.95 percent. The figure for the 10 years through 2011 is 1.4 percent, but the I.M.F. predictions indicate the 2013 figure will fall to just 0.94 percent. The fund expects the British economy to grow by just 0.6 percent this year and by 2 percent in 2013.

The situation is even worse in Italy, where the fund expects the economy to contract by 2.2 percent this year and 0.6 percent the following year. If that happens, Italy’s economy will be smaller at the end of 2013 than it was 10 years earlier. The French economy is forecast to have grown at a 1 percent annual rate over the same 10-year period.

As the developed economies stagnate, the ‘emerging’ economies grow. Nineteen of the world’s top economies in 2050 will be those we regard as “emerging” today. China and India will hold the number 1 and number 3 spots, with the US sandwiched between them.

So far, we are just talking about numbers. Try to imagine a world in which today’s emerging markets have more economic power, and vastly more people, than today’s leaders. It is not just China and India who will be calling the shots, but Brazil, Turkey, Russia, Mexico and Indonesia too.

New technologies, new fashions, new ideas, new music, new cars, new movies…all are likely to come from countries where, today, Westerners are afraid to drink the water. Now, they are imitating us. Soon, we will be listening to pop Indian sitar music, eating doner kebabs and watching movies made in Jakarta.

Military power, too, is likely to shift to the growing economies. Like a body builder with a protein shake, they will use their increasing resources, human as well as material, to add muscle. But their muscle will be young, built with new technology and new techniques. America’s geriatric, expensive, bureaucracy-ridden, zombified military industry will be unable to match it.

It is one thing to talk nonsense to the voters. They love that kind of stuff. It flatters them. It comforts them.

But only a fool would believe it.

Which is what worries us. The candidates seem to think “declinism” is just a state of mind…and that economic and military success can be had by act of willpower.

“Decline,” writes Charles Krauthammer, “is a choice.”

And it’s a choice the candidates think they can avoid just by giving more money to America’s military industry.

“I will insist on a military so powerful no on would ever think of challenging it,” adds Mitt Romney.

But military spending is not a way to resist decline; it is a sign of it…and a cause of it. Osama bin Laden understood how it worked. By 2000, he had already brought one great empire, the Soviet Union, to its knees, luring it to spend money it didn’t have in a war it couldn’t win. He thought he could do the same to the US. So far, it looks as though he was right.

Lt. Col. Daniel L. Davis has been described as a “whistleblower.” He’s ratting out the military for failing in Afghanistan, just as Osama bin Laden predicted.

He doesn’t seem to understand. The military is not protecting the US in Afghanistan; there’s nothing to protect it against. Nor did it ever intend to “win” a war in Afghanistan. It never even identified what winning would mean or how it would know when it had won. This was always a zombie war, not a real war. Its purpose was only to transfer wealth and power to the military industry. In that sense, the war is a great success.

The Armed Forces Journal has the story:

Truth, lies and Afghanistan
How military leaders have let us down

By LT. COL. DANIEL L. DAVIS

I spent last year in Afghanistan, visiting and talking with US troops and their Afghan partners. My duties with the Army’s Rapid Equipping Force took me into every significant area where our soldiers engage the enemy. Over the course of 12 months, I covered more than 9,000 miles and talked, traveled and patrolled with troops in Kandahar, Kunar, Ghazni, Khost, Paktika, Kunduz, Balkh, Nangarhar and other provinces.

What I saw bore no resemblance to rosy official statements by US military leaders about conditions on the ground.

Entering this deployment, I was sincerely hoping to learn that the claims were true: that conditions in Afghanistan were improving, that the local government and military were progressing toward self-sufficiency. I did not need to witness dramatic improvements to be reassured, but merely hoped to see evidence of positive trends, to see companies or battalions produce even minimal but sustainable progress.

Instead, I witnessed the absence of success on virtually every level.

Regards,

Bill Bonner,
for The Daily Reckoning

When Emerging Markets Shape the Developed World originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas.

After reading the article, we concluded that Mr. Davidoff is the most creative financial writer around. As such, Mr. Davidoff may be the perfect apologist for today’s dysfunctional monetary “system.” Certainly, he possesses the cerebral alacrity to dodge whatever cold, hard facts may be standing in the way of a good story.

“I call the Fed a hedge fund,” Davidoff cheerily explains, “because it is operating like one, leveraging its balance sheet to earn huge profits.”

We might have been able to embrace Davidoff’s analysis were it not for one nettlesome fact: the Fed is absolutely nothing like a hedge fund. The Fed is, instead, more like a crime syndicate — a racketeer that relies on coercion, deception and outright larceny.

But before explaining The Daily Reckoning’s official metaphor for the Fed, let’s return to Davidoff’s metaphor and “analysis.” Says Davidoff:

Last year, the central bank turned over $76.9 billion in profit to the federal government, slightly down from $79.3 billion it provided in 2010.

The Fed made this money in interest on a nearly $3 trillion portfolio of securities. This enormous holding was built up largely in the wake of the financial crisis as the Fed bought these securities through two rounds of quantitative easing.

I call the Fed a hedge fund because it is operating like one, leveraging its balance sheet to earn huge profits. The main difference between a hedge fund and the Fed is that the Fed effectively creates its own money, so it doesn’t have any borrowing costs, meaning yet more profits.

Remarkably, the Fed’s profits are also an afterthought. The Fed is trying to stabilize and increase the United States economy in the wake of the financial crisis, and its profits are a nice byproduct.

Still, these earnings blow away any other hedge fund profits.

Hmmm… where to begin our autopsy of this fatally flawed analysis?

Let’s begin at the end with those earnings that “blow away any other hedge fund profits.”

If Davidoff is referring only to the Fed’s $79.3 billion “earnings,” without any regard for the denominator that produced those earnings, he is absolutely correct. No other hedge fund in the world came close to earning $79.3 billion in 2011, primarily because no other hedge fund in the world runs a $3 trillion portfolio. But obviously, the absolute number tells us nothing about the genius — or lack thereof — behind the Fed’s investment activities.

To get a feel for that, let’s now insert a denominator and calculate a return. Based on the $3 trillion portfolio that Davidoff cites in his column, the Fed produced a 2.6% return. That kind of number would not pop any year-end champagne corks in any hedge fund office in the land. [Editor’s note: In reality, the Fed’s balance sheet averaged about $2.75 trillion during 2011, not $3 trillion. But since $3 trillion is the number Davidoff uses, we’ll use it also].

But maybe Davidoff had a different return calculation in mind when he dubbed the Fed “the most successful hedge fund around.” Maybe he was thinking the denominator ought to be zero instead of $3 trillion, since, as he observes, the Fed “effectively creates its own money.” In this scenario the Fed’s investment activities would have produced a mind-boggling return of “infinity percent.”

Davidoff is absolutely right; no hedge fund can do that.

Or maybe Davidoff was thinking of a denominator somewhere between zero and $3 trillion. Maybe he had $676 million in mind, which is the actual amount of money the Fed spent last year printing new dollar bills. In this scenario, the Fed’s result would have been a spectacular 117.3%. That’s not quite infinity percent, but it’s not bad.

Unfortunately, there’s another problem with Davidoff’s analysis; the numerator is as much a mystery as the denominator. In other words, the Fed’s theoretical $79.3 billion return is a bogus Beardstown Ladies kind of number since it does not account for marking all the Fed’s securities to market. Without marking its vast $3 trillion portfolio to market, the actual results of the Fed’s investment activities are unknowable.

Perhaps the Fed’s hodgepodge of Treasury bonds, mortgage-backed securities, currency swaps and other financial jetsam increased in value during 2011, in which case the total return would have been higher than 2.6%. Or perhaps these holdings decreased in value, in which case the total return would have been lower than 2.6% — maybe even negative.

No one knows. (Or if they know, they aren’t saying).

Net-net, Davidoff’s analysis, expressed as a mathematical equation, would be greater than or equal to idiotic. That said, as a fellow journalist, we sympathize with Mr. Davidoff. We, too, have written things that should never have survived the copy-editing process. But when we have, we have heard about it from readers…just as Mr. Davidoff heard about it from many of the bloggers on Yahoo! Finance who responded to his column:

Kaos from Plainfield, Connecticut wrote:

Anything done by the NY Times is fire starter material.

Greg from Indianapolis wrote:

“The main difference between a hedge fund and the Fed is that the Fed effectively creates its own money, so it doesn’t have any borrowing costs”

Yeah…that is kind of an advantage…

RJ Wrote:

So the Fed made $76.9 billion from interest on US government debt, then turned that over to the Treasury Department?

Wait, what???

JR wrote:

Maybe this year [the Fed] will print a trillion dollars, turn it over to the Treasury, and this writer can say, “Look, a government operation made a trillion dollars while the idiots in the private sector flounder.” The New York Times is a disgrace.

Mark from Tulsa, Oklahoma wrote:

My 6-year old could make money if he could print dollar bills at will.

While we are sympathetic with these critiques, we can’t really be upset with Mr. Davidoff for producing his obsequious homage to the Federal Reserve, anymore than we can be upset with a puppy for peeing on the side of a brand-new flat-screen TV. To the puppy, the TV looks just like a fire hydrant. And to Davidoff, by his own admission, the Fed looks just like a hedge fund.

But it isn’t. The Fed is a crime syndicate that relies on deception, coercion and grand larceny. It is a racketeer.

“Several forms of racket exist,” Wikipedia explains. “The best-known is the protection racket, in which criminals demand money from businesses in exchange for the service of ‘protection’ against crimes that the racketeers themselves instigate. Traditionally, the word racket is used to describe a business (or syndicate)…that it is engaged in the sale of a solution to a problem that the institution itself creates or perpetuates, with the specific intent to engender continual patronage.”

’Nuff said!

Regards,

Eric J. Fry
for The Daily Reckoning

The Federal Reserve and Other Crimes Against Capitalism originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas.

Take for instance yesterday, when I said that thing in Greece were unraveling very quickly… Less than an hour after I hit “send” on the Pfennig, I saw a quote from French President, Sarkozy, who said, “we couldn’t be closer to a deal in Greece”… Hmmm… Seems that there was no reason for me to be so Donnie Downer on Greece! Yeah, and I’ve got some swampland I need to sell you… Hey Disney World was built on swampland, so you’ve got that going for you! HA!

This morning, the euro (EUR) has climbed back above 1.31, on news that the Greek leaders have agreed to meet today (now probably) to put the final touches on structural economic reform, which has been demanded by the Trokia (or Troika — tomato, tomato, it’s all the same) and consists of the IMF, the European Commission and the European Central Bank (ECB). The Trokia had demanded these economic reforms before the next round of bailout funds are released. The Greek leaders need to cut 850 million euros from their spending, which will account for 1.5% of GDP…

This trading range in the euro lately has been as tight as a pair of new shoes on a rainy day… The euro has either bumped up above 1.31, or fallen below it… 1.32 had been a tough row to hoe for the euro, and so, the trading range has been established… And I believe it will remain there as long as the Sword of Damocles is hanging over Greece…

Remember when I kept telling you that the Bank of Japan (BOJ) and the Finance Ministry were saber-rattling and trying to verbally intervene to get the yen (JPY) weaker, but that it wouldn’t be long before they were digging into that treasure chest of yen that has been allocated for intervention? And then nothing? Nada, zilch, zero, a big goose egg!

Ahhh Grasshopper, it only appeared to us that the BOJ was sitting on its hands… Last night the Finance Ministry released a report showing that the BOJ had conducted 1.02 trillion yen ($13 billion) worth of unannounced intervention during the first week of November. So, who knew? Who knew the BOJ could be stealth-like? This way, the markets weren’t aware of the intervention, because the BOJ spread it out, and was quiet about it… And it worked, (as best as intervention can, that is) bringing the yen from its post-WWII high of 75.35 to 76.50… But, that’s not what the BOJ had to have had on their minds… The yen is still too strong for exporters at 76.50, so… Can we expect to find out about more “stealth intervention”? I think so…

The Aussie dollar (AUD) is stronger this morning on a relief trade… The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA), unexpectedly left rates unchanged, and instead of dire words, signaled optimism that global economic growth will strengthen. The Aussie dollar touched $1.0810 after the rate announcement, but has since fallen back below $1.08… But not far, and still stronger than yesterday!

The New Zealand dollar/kiwi (NZD) really liked the fact that the RBA left rates unchanged, because it has clutched on to the Aussie dollar’s coattails in recent times, and if the Aussie dollar is going to rally on the news, then kiwi gets to rally too!

I see where The Washington Post, (WP) must have a Pfennig reader… For they ran a report last night about how the unemployment rate here in the US is falling because of the millions of workers who have given up looking for work… The Washington Post writer believes that if all 2.8 million people who have given up looking for work were actually counted as “unemployed” that the Unemployment Rate would be 9.9%, not 8.3%…

Of course, the WP writer would do a better job if they dug even deeper into the phony, trumped up BLS labor report, to find how John Williams at Shadow Stats thinks the unemployment rate is really 22%…

While I’m here in the US, St. Louis Fed Head, James Bullard was speaking in Chicago yesterday, and had this to say about the Fed keeping interest rates near zero to counteract a high degree of slack in the US economy… “If we continue using this interpretation of events, it may be very difficult for the US to ever move off of the zero lower bound on nominal interest rates. This could be a looming disaster for the United States.” — James Bullard.

Fed Head Bullard is telling you all and anyone who will listen that we are all turning Japanese! He didn’t say it, but the scenario he described is exactly what has happened to Japan… I sure hope someone is listening in the Fed Head circles…

Today, the data cupboard will print Consumer Credit for December… You may recall how this number exploded in November by $20 billion… Well, December credit is expected to hit $7 billion… This data is covered little, and I wonder why… It’s very telling about what’s going on, don’t you think?

Over in Germany this morning, the December print of Industrial Production (IP) was very weak, as it decreased 2.9% from November. There could be two things at work here… First, there’s not much work that gets done as Christmas closes in for German workers… And second, the German economy softened… But none of the other data we saw from this time period indicated that, so I’m going to go with what’s behind door number 1!

Today, Big Ben Bernanke will testify before the Senate on the economic outlook and the Federal Budget situation… Last week, when Big Ben talked to the House, the lawmakers tried like all get out to get Bernanke to fess up to messing up the economy, but as I reported here on Friday, he redirected the lawmakers questions to him talking about what he wanted to talk about, which was how he wants the lawmakers to get deficit spending under control.

It will be interesting to see how Big Ben is treated in the Senate… Either way, he’s a master of redirecting, and the talk will all come back to lawmakers getting deficit spending under control! Which is a good subject to talk about, but I’m sure what the lawmakers have to say about what Bernanke is doing to the dollar is also a good subject to talk about!

Last week I told you how the Swiss franc/euro cross rate was nearing the floor of 1.20 that the Swiss National Bank (SNB) set last fall. I said then that it would be interesting to see the SNB’s resolve in defending this cross level… New SNB Chairman, Thomas Jordan, is setting the markets straight on his resolve. Jordan said, “We remain firmly committed to defending the minimum exchange rate of 1.20 francs per euro. This commitment applies at any time, from the moment the market opens in Sydney on Monday to when it closes in New York on Friday. We will not tolerate any trading below the minimum rate.”

Well… I guess he told the markets where he stand, eh? But… As I’ve said before, money talks and bulldookie walks… It’s now up to the markets to see if the SNB is really going to defend the cross or not… Which, by the way, this morning is weaker than it was last week at 1.2070…

One of the things that I look at periodically is the “misery index”, which is comprised of the Unemployment Rate and the inflation rate… I like to see where the US is compared to other countries like Norway and Australia or Canada, etc.

Well, my most recent look at the Misery Index showed the following recent results…

US 11.30% up from 2011’s 10.60%
Canada 9.9% down from 2011’s 10.10%
Norway 3.0% down from 2011’s 5.9%
Australia 8.3% up from 2011’s 7.60%

I think it is important to a country’s psyche to have a lower misery index number…

So… If that’s as interesting to you as it is to me, I’ll keep this up-to-date going forward.

I see where the 3.6 million workers in the German metal and electrical industries union are demanding 6.5% wage increases. This is going to be a very heated negotiation, because in 2010, German companies did quite well, but… Most economists believe that the German economy will slip this year, along with the rest of the Eurozone, into a recession…

And in the UK it appears that the Bank of England (BOE) will extend their bond purchase program (quantitative easing)… And remember what I’ve told you now for a couple of years… What happens in the UK usually comes ashore here within 6 months… So, if the BOE is extending QE, then the Fed will be doing it soon enough…

And gold is still trying to find traction to move higher, as it slips on the overall better feeling about what’s going on in the global economies… I find this to be temporary… So, could be a good time to pick up some gold at cheaper prices, eh? I said could be…

Then there was this… From The Economist… First, I’ll give you the snippet of the Economist story and then tie it all together in a neat bow… OK… Here’s The Economist… “China and the US might be laying the foundation for another Cold War over China’s territorial claim for the South China Sea, The Economist’s Banyan columnist writes. None of the nations with interests in the South China Sea is making progress toward settling disputes. “So the chances are that America, with its mighty Navy and abiding interest in the freedom of navigation and commerce, will become still more involved.” — The Economist

Chuck again… Remember Rome? Remember how the Roman army got too extended putting out fires everywhere? Hmmm… Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, South China Sea, doesn’t this scare anyone else?

To recap… The RBA left rates unchanged, and surprised the markets last night, sending the Aussie dollar over $1.08. It has slipped back below the figure this morning, but still stronger than yesterday! Japan has been doing stealth intervention to keep a lid on yen, going back to November, and The Washington Post figures out the funny bookkeeping at the BLS…

Chuck Butler
for The Daily Reckoning

RBA Sounds Upbeat About Global Economic Growth originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas.

Kenneth Rogoff, for example, concludes that “improved education alone will not resolve the flaws inherent in today’s capitalism, but it [is an] essential first step down any path to a solution.”

Oh? We never quite figured out the connection. The problem in a nutshell is that developed countries have too much debt and not enough growth. And their debt is growing faster than their output. How then does spending more on non-productive behavior increase GDP output or decrease debt?

Contemporary education is a dead end. The industry has been taken over by zombies. Huge amounts of money — public, private, charitable, debt, savings, earnings — are invested. The output is small, dubious and perhaps even negative.

We know that in some fields, such as economics, the more instruction a person has, the less he knows. Economics — as taught in many universities — is a value-subtracting discipline. As to other fields — politics, sociology, literature, gender studies — we are suspicious.

We have also noted that despite huge increases in per capita, inflation adjusted spending over the last 40 years, test scores have not increased. This suggests that the money was wasted.

But our suspicions run deeper. We suspect that — outside science and engineering — most education, from the first grade to a PhD, is at best a costly luxury…at worst, a big waste of time and money.

Here is evidence, a letter from a former slave to his former master, written only a few years after the War Between the States came to an end. We don’t know, but it is unlikely the former slave had any formal education. But you will notice that today’s typical university graduate could not match his clear thinking or his polite, funny, sarcastic style:

Dayton, Ohio,
August 7, 1865

To My Old Master, Colonel P.H. Anderson, Big Spring, Tennessee

Sir: I got your letter, and was glad to find that you had not forgotten Jourdon, and that you wanted me to come back and live with you again, promising to do better for me than anybody else can. I have often felt uneasy about you. I thought the Yankees would have hung you long before this, for harboring Rebs they found at your house. I suppose they never heard about your going to Colonel Martin’s to kill the Union soldier that was left by his company in their stable. Although you shot at me twice before I left you, I did not want to hear of your being hurt, and am glad you are still living. It would do me good to go back to the dear old home again, and see Miss Mary and Miss Martha and Allen, Esther, Green, and Lee. Give my love to them all, and tell them I hope we will meet in the better world, if not in this. I would have gone back to see you all when I was working in the Nashville Hospital, but one of the neighbors told me that Henry intended to shoot me if he ever got a chance.

I want to know particularly what the good chance is you propose to give me. I am doing tolerably well here. I get twenty-five dollars a month, with victuals and clothing; have a comfortable home for Mandy — the folks call her Mrs. Anderson — and the children — Milly, Jane, and Grundy — go to school and are learning well. The teacher says Grundy has a head for a preacher. They go to Sunday school, and Mandy and me attend church regularly. We are kindly treated. Sometimes we overhear others saying, “Them colored people were slaves” down in Tennessee. The children feel hurt when they hear such remarks; but I tell them it was no disgrace in Tennessee to belong to Colonel Anderson. Many darkeys would have been proud, as I used to be, to call you master. Now if you will write and say what wages you will give me, I will be better able to decide whether it would be to my advantage to move back again.

As to my freedom, which you say I can have, there is nothing to be gained on that score, as I got my free papers in 1864 from the Provost-Marshal-General of the Department of Nashville. Mandy says she would be afraid to go back without some proof that you were disposed to treat us justly and kindly; and we have concluded to test your sincerity by asking you to send us our wages for the time we served you. This will make us forget and forgive old scores, and rely on your justice and friendship in the future. I served you faithfully for thirty-two years, and Mandy twenty years. At twenty-five dollars a month for me, and two dollars a week for Mandy, our earnings would amount to eleven thousand six hundred and eighty dollars. Add to this the interest for the time our wages have been kept back, and deduct what you paid for our clothing, and three doctor’s visits to me, and pulling a tooth for Mandy, and the balance will show what we are in justice entitled to. Please send the money by Adams’s Express, in care of V. Winters, Esq., Dayton, Ohio. If you fail to pay us for faithful labors in the past, we can have little faith in your promises in the future. We trust the good Maker has opened your eyes to the wrongs which you and your fathers have done to me and my fathers, in making us toil for you for generations without recompense. Here I draw my wages every Saturday night; but in Tennessee there was never any pay-day for the negroes any more than for the horses and cows. Surely there will be a day of reckoning for those who defraud the laborer of his hire.

In answering this letter, please state if there would be any safety for my Milly and Jane, who are now grown up, and both good-looking girls. You know how it was with poor Matilda and Catherine. I would rather stay here and starve — and die, if it come to that — than have my girls brought to shame by the violence and wickedness of their young masters. You will also please state if there has been any schools opened for the colored children in your neighborhood. The great desire of my life now is to give my children an education, and have them form virtuous habits.

Say howdy to George Carter, and thank him for taking the pistol from you when you were shooting at me.

From your old servant,

Jourdon Anderson

Regards,

Bill Bonner
for The Daily Reckoning

The Problem with Contemporary Education originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas.