Yes…we’re going to Japan!

The gist of the Japanese situation is this:

The bubble burst in 1990. But rather than let their big businesses go belly up, the Japanese used every trick in the book. Counter-cyclical deficits up the Shinanho. ZIRP (zero interest rate policy). And QE too.

The economy didn’t grow. It didn’t collapse. It just got stuck…like a moth in amber. No new jobs. No new output. And get this, Japan is expected to lose 40% of its working age population by 2050.

But Japan is a leader, not a follower. Over the next 40 years, Germany will lose more than 30% of its working age population too. Russia and Poland will lose even more.

Growth is expected to be negligible over the next 40 years in Japan. But it will be almost nothing in many other countries too, according to an HSBC report. It estimates that the US will grow at around 1.5% annually. France 1.1%. Denmark, Norway, Sweden — barely anything at all.

What does this sound like to you, dear reader? It sounds like the whole developed world going Japan’s way — with low growth and high debts from here to eternity.

As in Japan, so in Europe and America. The European Central Bank is lending the banks as much as they want — at low rates. The Fed has its own ZIRP…which it says it will keep in place until 2014.

Growth is stalled…debts are mounting up. Hello Tokyo!

But wait…here’s the Congressional Budget Office telling us that Congress will have those deficits under control in no time.

“Deficits to fall sharply, US forecast says,” reports the International Herald Tribune.

What a relief that is! The CBO has crunched the numbers. It has beaten up the 2s. It has punched out the 5s. It has pounded the 6s. And now, finally, like prisoners at Guantanamo, the numbers tell us what we want to hear.

US debt is going down!

Wait a minute…are these the same number crunchers who, at the beginning of the 21st century, forecast federal surpluses as far as the eye could see?

Yes, it is!

But, okay, that didn’t work out exactly as planned. They crunched the numbers but then the numbers got un-crunched on their own. Damned numbers! You just can’t trust them.

So, how can we trust these numbers?

That’s just it, dear reader, we can’t. In order to work out as planned, they require:

1. Congress has to let the Bush tax cuts expire on schedule. Hmmm… Will that happen? Beats us. It probably depends on who wins the elections in November…which probably depends on what the economy does between now and then…which probably depends on more things than we can begin to estimate and compute.

But the central idea of it — that Congress will act responsibly — seems like something you can’t say with a straight face. Will pandas stop eating bamboo? Will teenagers stop slouching? Will liquor stores make free home deliveries? Nope. Everything has a nature of its own. And the nature of Congress is to spend money it doesn’t have on things it doesn’t need. And then to push the bill onto the next Congress…the next administration and the next generation.

2. Not only do taxes have to go up, so does economic growth. There’s a problem right there. According to prevailing theories, if you increase taxes during a de-leveraging spell, you don’t get faster rates of GDP growth. You get slower growth.

The CBO acknowledges this problem, to a degree. It allows as how unemployment may go up, thanks to the tax increases. In fact, they say it will go to 9% in 2013.

How will the President, Congress and the Fed react to rising unemployment? Mightn’t it tempt them to engage in a little more counter-cyclical stimulus…at the expense of the tax cuts?

And what happens to growth rates? The CBO figures that growth can outstrip deficits. Maybe. Maybe not. Now, it’s not even close. There’s a $1.1 trillion deficit this year. Growth? Maybe a fifth of that. In other words, debt is growing 5 times faster than the economy.

During Mr. Obama’s first (and maybe last) term, US debt will grow by more than $5 trillion. Another term like that and we’ll be over $20 trillion.

And already the weight of debt is pressing down growth rates…and it’s getting worse.

And if HSBC is right, US growth will be very slow. Will deficits also be very low? Below 1.5% of GDP? Down from over $1 for the last 4 years to under $225 billion for the next 40?

Heck, we’re as soft-headed as anyone. We’d like to see the whole problem go away too. And maybe it will…

But we wouldn’t bet on it…

Bill Bonner
for The Daily Reckoning

Debt Beats the Economy in a Growth Race originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas.

But are gold buyers making a big mistake? Is history repeating itself? The New York Times suggests it is:

As it was in 1980, could it be again in 2012?

The 1980 presidential election was fought by a Democratic incumbent weakened by a poor economy amid worries that the United States had lost its ability to compete in the world. Gold prices had risen to unprecedented levels as the election approached, and the Republican nominee hinted he might propose a return to a gold standard.

That Republican, Ronald Reagan, won the election and soon appointed a commission to study the role of gold in monetary systems. To gold bugs, it appeared to be the best chance in decades to move the country toward gold and away from what they like to call “fiat money,” a currency anchored by nothing more than government dictates.

Last month, Newt Gingrich, seeking to widen his support in the days leading up to the South Carolina primary, promised that he would appoint a new gold commission. “Part of our approach ought to be to re-establish something Ronald Reagan did in 1981 and that is to have a commission on gold to look at the whole concept of how do we get back to hard money,” he said in a speech.

No, dear reader, history is not repeating itself. The NYT is wrong…about everything. Well, almost everything. It understands that gold is a threat to its big advertisers…and most of its readers (who don’t own any gold). It is also a threat to most economists — who have built their careers on not understanding how a real economy actually works…and whose income and whose professional status now depend on a gold-free, centrally-planned economy.

So, to prove that gold is a ‘barbarous relic’ and that gold bugs walk on four legs, they merely put the question to economists.

The University of Chicago last month asked a panel of 40 economists, including former advisers to both Democratic and Republican presidents, if they agreed that “price-stability and employment outcomes would be better for the average American” if the dollar’s value were tied to gold. Every one of them disagreed, some with more than a little incredulity that such a question was worthy of discussion.

“Why tie to gold?” asked [the very witty] Richard Thaler, a University of Chicago professor. “Why not 1982 Bordeaux?”

“Eesh,” responded Austan Goolsbee, a Chicago colleague and former adviser to President Obama. “Has it come to this?”

The Times goes on to report that “even economists with some sympathy to gold opposed the idea” of a gold-backed dollar. And Mr. Ben Bernanke, former professor of economics at Princeton, says he doesn’t think gold is money.

Oh yeah, replied Congressman Ron Paul, then why do central banks hold gold…and not things such as ’82 Bordeaux or diamonds?

Mr. Bernanke replied that it was just a matter of “tradition.”

Yes, he’s right…it is a matter of tradition, like marriage…like property rights…like government…like murder…like teenagers who moon adults out of car windows…or like drivers who give each other the finger.

Traditions become traditions because people keep doing them. And they keep doing them for reasons that aren’t likely to go away. Times change. Conditions change. Human nature doesn’t.

But let us go back to the New York Times’ silly notion that we are about to relive the period following ’80. What seems to have triggered the idea was Newt Gingrich’s proposal to study the idea of going back on the gold standard. Every right thinking person in the country — the Times implies — knows the idea is foolish. And the price of the yellow metal is sure to fall, as it did after the Reagan election, when people realize how foolish it is.

But gold didn’t fall after ’80 because the Reagan administration didn’t put it back in the monetary system. It fell because Paul Volcker made it unnecessary. Instead of printing money, Volcker tightened up…taking out some of the money that was already there. And he did it under conditions that were not merely unlike those of today…but almost the exact opposite.

Then, the US was still a creditor to the rest of the world, not a debtor.

Then, the US was still running positive trade balances, not losing money every month.

Then, US stocks were at bargain levels…selling for 5 to 8 times earnings; today, they’re twice as expensive.

Then, US bonds were cheap too…with yields for US Treasury debt as high as 18%, or nearly SIX TIMES as high as today’s long bonds.

Then, US households had debt of only 60% or 70% of their disposable income, not 120% like today.

Then, the Fed was determined to stifle inflation; now it is determined to cause it.

Then, the federal government’s debt was less than 40% of GDP. Now, it’s over 100%.

Then, even in today’s inflation adjusted terms, the US government ran a deficit of $197 billion. Today, the deficit is $1.1 trillion.

Then, stocks had been going down for the previous 14 years; bonds had been going down for at least 31 years. Now, stocks and bonds have been going up, generally, for the last 30 years.

This final point is now just a detail. It’s the heart of the matter. With bonds at a 30-year low, Paul Volcker could squeeze inflation…begin a 3-decade period of rising bonds (with falling interest rates)…and an 18-year bust in the gold market.

Will that happen again? Impossible!

What kind of strange history would it be if it could repeat itself…from totally different initial conditions? Could Napoleon march on Moscow…if he had started out in Chicago rather than Paris? Could Liz Taylor have married Richard Burton twice if she’d died in a traffic accident after her first marriage?

Can gold now repeat its path of ’80-’98, even though today’s situation is almost the opposite in every way?

No, dear reader, history doesn’t repeat itself. It just stutters out the same truths, over and over. G..g..g..g..gold is m…m…m…money. It says.

The N..N…New Y…Y…Y…York Times is full of s..s..s..s…

…error!

Who knows what the future will give us? We don’t. Not here at The Daily Reckoning…

…but we see what could be a bad moon rising. No, we’re not talking about a Great Correction…or even a Depression. Who really cares if GDP goes up or down? You can go broke with honor…with a sense of humor…and with grace and dignity. You can happily go broke.

But you can’t go to Hell with grace and dignity.

In the following article, the FBI notes that 18 people a year have been convicted, mostly of ‘white collar crimes.’ You wouldn’t think this would call for comment. But the FBI says these people are “extremists” who believe they have a right to protect themselves from what they see as an overbearing government. The G-men tell us that these extremists can turn violent “at the drop of a hat.”

How long before they’re rounded up? And maybe they’ll round up “potential domestic terrorists” too, even those who have never committed any crime? And what about gold bugs? They may look harmless, but they give aid and comfort to dangerous elements, don’t they?

Here is the FBI preparing the public for a trip to Hell.

(Reuters) — Anti-government extremists opposed to taxes and regulations pose a growing threat to local law enforcement officers in the United States, the FBI warned on Monday.

These extremists, sometimes known as “sovereign citizens,” believe they can live outside any type of government authority, FBI agents said at a news conference.

The extremists may refuse to pay taxes, defy government environmental regulations and believe the United States went bankrupt by going off the gold standard.

Routine encounters with police can turn violent “at the drop of a hat,” said Stuart McArthur, deputy assistant director in the FBI’s counterterrorism division.

“We thought it was important to increase the visibility of the threat with state and local law enforcement,” he said.

In May 2010, two West Memphis, Arkansas, police officers were shot and killed in an argument that developed after they pulled over a “sovereign citizen” in traffic.

Last year, an extremist in Texas opened fire on a police officer during a traffic stop. The officer was not hit.

Legal convictions of such extremists, mostly for white-collar crimes such as fraud, have increased from 10 in 2009 to 18 each in 2010 and 2011, FBI agents said.

“We are being inundated right now with requests for training from state and local law enforcement on sovereign-related matters,” said Casey Carty, an FBI supervisory special agent.

FBI agents said they do not have a tally of people who consider themselves “sovereign citizens.”

J.J. MacNab, a former tax and insurance expert who is an analyst covering the sovereign movement, has estimated that it has about 100,000 members.

Sovereign members often express particular outrage at tax collection, putting Internal Revenue Service employees at risk.

Regards,

Bill Bonner
for The Daily Reckoning

Why Gold is Money Despite Changing Conditions originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas.

Well, Dear Reader, we’re here to tell you: America is in decline.

We can give it to you straight because we’re not running for public office. And if we were elected, we would immediately demand a recount.

Anyone who tells you America is not in decline is either running for office…or not paying attention.

In 1969, more than one out of every three dollars of income in the entire globe was earned in the US. That’s what the IMF’s World Economic Outlook tells us.

By 2000, that number had fallen…but not by much. The US still took home 31% of global income. But in the last 10 years, the US share has fallen hard — losing more than 7%. Now, only 23% of the world’s income is generated by the US.

Ten years ago, China’s economy measured about 1/8th the size of the US. Now, it is 41%. Another decade and it will be the biggest in the world. It is already bigger by several measures. And even if its growth declines to 7% a year, it will still surpass the US in a dozen years.

Hey, don’t take it personally. The entire developed world is in decline — with America leading them all down.

By 2050, according to a new study from HSBC, today’s emerging economies — as a whole — will be larger than Europe, America and Japan put together.

The New York Times reports:

The American economy’s reported 2.8 percent growth in the fourth quarter, at an annual rate, was seen as mildly encouraging. But it meant that over the previous 10 years, the economy had grown at a compound annual rate of just 1.7 percent. Until the current cycle, there had been no similar prolonged period of slow growth since the Depression.

The International Monetary Fund’s latest forecasts indicate that there is not likely to be a pickup in growth anytime soon, either in the United States or other large industrialized countries.

…if the fund’s forecasts of 1.8 percent real growth in 2012 and 2.2 percent in 2013 prove to be accurate, the 10-year American rate at the end of 2013 will have fallen to 1.5 percent… But it will still be a little above the 0.9 percent compound growth rate in the decade from 1929, the year the Depression began, to 1939.

For Britain, which endured a horrible decade in the 1970s that led to talk of the “British disease,” the previous postwar low, not shown in the charts, was in the 10 years ending in the second quarter of 1983, an annual rate of 0.95 percent. The figure for the 10 years through 2011 is 1.4 percent, but the I.M.F. predictions indicate the 2013 figure will fall to just 0.94 percent. The fund expects the British economy to grow by just 0.6 percent this year and by 2 percent in 2013.

The situation is even worse in Italy, where the fund expects the economy to contract by 2.2 percent this year and 0.6 percent the following year. If that happens, Italy’s economy will be smaller at the end of 2013 than it was 10 years earlier. The French economy is forecast to have grown at a 1 percent annual rate over the same 10-year period.

As the developed economies stagnate, the ‘emerging’ economies grow. Nineteen of the world’s top economies in 2050 will be those we regard as “emerging” today. China and India will hold the number 1 and number 3 spots, with the US sandwiched between them.

So far, we are just talking about numbers. Try to imagine a world in which today’s emerging markets have more economic power, and vastly more people, than today’s leaders. It is not just China and India who will be calling the shots, but Brazil, Turkey, Russia, Mexico and Indonesia too.

New technologies, new fashions, new ideas, new music, new cars, new movies…all are likely to come from countries where, today, Westerners are afraid to drink the water. Now, they are imitating us. Soon, we will be listening to pop Indian sitar music, eating doner kebabs and watching movies made in Jakarta.

Military power, too, is likely to shift to the growing economies. Like a body builder with a protein shake, they will use their increasing resources, human as well as material, to add muscle. But their muscle will be young, built with new technology and new techniques. America’s geriatric, expensive, bureaucracy-ridden, zombified military industry will be unable to match it.

It is one thing to talk nonsense to the voters. They love that kind of stuff. It flatters them. It comforts them.

But only a fool would believe it.

Which is what worries us. The candidates seem to think “declinism” is just a state of mind…and that economic and military success can be had by act of willpower.

“Decline,” writes Charles Krauthammer, “is a choice.”

And it’s a choice the candidates think they can avoid just by giving more money to America’s military industry.

“I will insist on a military so powerful no on would ever think of challenging it,” adds Mitt Romney.

But military spending is not a way to resist decline; it is a sign of it…and a cause of it. Osama bin Laden understood how it worked. By 2000, he had already brought one great empire, the Soviet Union, to its knees, luring it to spend money it didn’t have in a war it couldn’t win. He thought he could do the same to the US. So far, it looks as though he was right.

Lt. Col. Daniel L. Davis has been described as a “whistleblower.” He’s ratting out the military for failing in Afghanistan, just as Osama bin Laden predicted.

He doesn’t seem to understand. The military is not protecting the US in Afghanistan; there’s nothing to protect it against. Nor did it ever intend to “win” a war in Afghanistan. It never even identified what winning would mean or how it would know when it had won. This was always a zombie war, not a real war. Its purpose was only to transfer wealth and power to the military industry. In that sense, the war is a great success.

The Armed Forces Journal has the story:

Truth, lies and Afghanistan
How military leaders have let us down

By LT. COL. DANIEL L. DAVIS

I spent last year in Afghanistan, visiting and talking with US troops and their Afghan partners. My duties with the Army’s Rapid Equipping Force took me into every significant area where our soldiers engage the enemy. Over the course of 12 months, I covered more than 9,000 miles and talked, traveled and patrolled with troops in Kandahar, Kunar, Ghazni, Khost, Paktika, Kunduz, Balkh, Nangarhar and other provinces.

What I saw bore no resemblance to rosy official statements by US military leaders about conditions on the ground.

Entering this deployment, I was sincerely hoping to learn that the claims were true: that conditions in Afghanistan were improving, that the local government and military were progressing toward self-sufficiency. I did not need to witness dramatic improvements to be reassured, but merely hoped to see evidence of positive trends, to see companies or battalions produce even minimal but sustainable progress.

Instead, I witnessed the absence of success on virtually every level.

Regards,

Bill Bonner,
for The Daily Reckoning

When Emerging Markets Shape the Developed World originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas.

Kenneth Rogoff, for example, concludes that “improved education alone will not resolve the flaws inherent in today’s capitalism, but it [is an] essential first step down any path to a solution.”

Oh? We never quite figured out the connection. The problem in a nutshell is that developed countries have too much debt and not enough growth. And their debt is growing faster than their output. How then does spending more on non-productive behavior increase GDP output or decrease debt?

Contemporary education is a dead end. The industry has been taken over by zombies. Huge amounts of money — public, private, charitable, debt, savings, earnings — are invested. The output is small, dubious and perhaps even negative.

We know that in some fields, such as economics, the more instruction a person has, the less he knows. Economics — as taught in many universities — is a value-subtracting discipline. As to other fields — politics, sociology, literature, gender studies — we are suspicious.

We have also noted that despite huge increases in per capita, inflation adjusted spending over the last 40 years, test scores have not increased. This suggests that the money was wasted.

But our suspicions run deeper. We suspect that — outside science and engineering — most education, from the first grade to a PhD, is at best a costly luxury…at worst, a big waste of time and money.

Here is evidence, a letter from a former slave to his former master, written only a few years after the War Between the States came to an end. We don’t know, but it is unlikely the former slave had any formal education. But you will notice that today’s typical university graduate could not match his clear thinking or his polite, funny, sarcastic style:

Dayton, Ohio,
August 7, 1865

To My Old Master, Colonel P.H. Anderson, Big Spring, Tennessee

Sir: I got your letter, and was glad to find that you had not forgotten Jourdon, and that you wanted me to come back and live with you again, promising to do better for me than anybody else can. I have often felt uneasy about you. I thought the Yankees would have hung you long before this, for harboring Rebs they found at your house. I suppose they never heard about your going to Colonel Martin’s to kill the Union soldier that was left by his company in their stable. Although you shot at me twice before I left you, I did not want to hear of your being hurt, and am glad you are still living. It would do me good to go back to the dear old home again, and see Miss Mary and Miss Martha and Allen, Esther, Green, and Lee. Give my love to them all, and tell them I hope we will meet in the better world, if not in this. I would have gone back to see you all when I was working in the Nashville Hospital, but one of the neighbors told me that Henry intended to shoot me if he ever got a chance.

I want to know particularly what the good chance is you propose to give me. I am doing tolerably well here. I get twenty-five dollars a month, with victuals and clothing; have a comfortable home for Mandy — the folks call her Mrs. Anderson — and the children — Milly, Jane, and Grundy — go to school and are learning well. The teacher says Grundy has a head for a preacher. They go to Sunday school, and Mandy and me attend church regularly. We are kindly treated. Sometimes we overhear others saying, “Them colored people were slaves” down in Tennessee. The children feel hurt when they hear such remarks; but I tell them it was no disgrace in Tennessee to belong to Colonel Anderson. Many darkeys would have been proud, as I used to be, to call you master. Now if you will write and say what wages you will give me, I will be better able to decide whether it would be to my advantage to move back again.

As to my freedom, which you say I can have, there is nothing to be gained on that score, as I got my free papers in 1864 from the Provost-Marshal-General of the Department of Nashville. Mandy says she would be afraid to go back without some proof that you were disposed to treat us justly and kindly; and we have concluded to test your sincerity by asking you to send us our wages for the time we served you. This will make us forget and forgive old scores, and rely on your justice and friendship in the future. I served you faithfully for thirty-two years, and Mandy twenty years. At twenty-five dollars a month for me, and two dollars a week for Mandy, our earnings would amount to eleven thousand six hundred and eighty dollars. Add to this the interest for the time our wages have been kept back, and deduct what you paid for our clothing, and three doctor’s visits to me, and pulling a tooth for Mandy, and the balance will show what we are in justice entitled to. Please send the money by Adams’s Express, in care of V. Winters, Esq., Dayton, Ohio. If you fail to pay us for faithful labors in the past, we can have little faith in your promises in the future. We trust the good Maker has opened your eyes to the wrongs which you and your fathers have done to me and my fathers, in making us toil for you for generations without recompense. Here I draw my wages every Saturday night; but in Tennessee there was never any pay-day for the negroes any more than for the horses and cows. Surely there will be a day of reckoning for those who defraud the laborer of his hire.

In answering this letter, please state if there would be any safety for my Milly and Jane, who are now grown up, and both good-looking girls. You know how it was with poor Matilda and Catherine. I would rather stay here and starve — and die, if it come to that — than have my girls brought to shame by the violence and wickedness of their young masters. You will also please state if there has been any schools opened for the colored children in your neighborhood. The great desire of my life now is to give my children an education, and have them form virtuous habits.

Say howdy to George Carter, and thank him for taking the pistol from you when you were shooting at me.

From your old servant,

Jourdon Anderson

Regards,

Bill Bonner
for The Daily Reckoning

The Problem with Contemporary Education originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas.

On Friday, Americans were still convinced that they were never going broke. The Europeans were still squabbling about how they were going to keep from going broke And the Japanese were telling each other that going broke wouldn’t be so bad.

For the United States of America, the road to hell has never been so smooth. The country has been borrowing its way to ruin for many years. But now, the skids are greased. The wheels are oiled. Strap on your seat belt. Whee!

Lenders practically insist that the US government take their money. Reuters reports:

The US government may ask investors to pay for the privilege and safety of holding short-term debt issued by its Treasury Department.

In response to clamor from investors, the Treasury said on Wednesday it was looking closely at allowing negative-yield auctions. This would mean bidders who want the security of US government debt in the face of global insecurity, might have to pay a premium for it.

Doing so would allow the US government to benefit from something that is already occurring on the secondary market, where investors have accepted negative yields in recent months to protect their cash from financial strains.

Remarkably, Wall Street is asking to be able to pay a premium for US debt even after the United States lost its prized AAA rating last year and as the government heads for a fourth straight year with $1 trillion-plus budget deficit.

“It is the unanimous view of the committee that Treasury should modify auction regulations to permit negative rate bidding and awards in Treasury bill auctions as soon as feasible,” according to minutes of the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee, which includes 21 financial institutions that make markets for US government securities.

On Tuesday, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said the United States was headed for a fourth straight year of $1 trillion-plus budget deficits, a condition that Republicans want to use as ammunition to hammer President Barack Obama’s spending record in the November voting.

Debt is still rising. At some point, it has to stop. Then, the feds go broke.

Why?

Because they are all living on borrowed time and borrowed money, only paying current expenses — including the interest on past borrowing — by borrowing more and more money. When the borrowing stops, they will no longer be able to pay their bills. And when that happens, their bonds will drop in value — fast. Governments will go broke. So will all the people who depend on the feds and their IOUs. Banks. Insurance companies. Retirees. Investors. The defense industry. The education industry. The healthcare industry.

Will this be a bad thing? Not necessarily. What has to happen sometime might as well happen now; get it over with. The longer debt builds up, unchecked, the more debt there is to liquidate when the end comes. Better for the end to come sooner, rather than later, in other words. If the end were allowed to come, we’d soon be at the beginning again.

But if there was one theme that ran through all the “Capitalism in Crisis” essays it was this: the end must be prevented, at all costs. Capitalism is inherently unstable, the writers agreed. Governments must use their power to keep it from going nuts. Otherwise, it may put an end to things.

We disagree. Markets — free markets — are meant to be unstable. They are meant to crack-up from time to time. And thank God they do. Otherwise, we’d be stuck forever with zombie industries and dead end investments. Every once in a while, capitalism throws a tantrum. But so what? Crises, breakdowns, crashes, washouts, liquidations — they’re just fast and efficient ways to get rid of the zombies.

And it’s not just developed countries that are subject to the temper fits of capitalism. Even China — a country still run by people who call themselves communists — is subject to capitalism’s mood swings.

Here’s a report from Bloomberg:

China’s economy is headed for a “hard landing” this year as weaker demand overseas chokes off exports, said Gary Shilling, who correctly forecast the US recession that began in December 2007.

A Chinese government report yesterday showed that export orders fell last month even as manufacturing expanded. The Shanghai Composite Index (SHCOMP) dropped 1.1 percent yesterday as stronger manufacturing boosted concern that the world’s second-largest economy will decelerate further as the government refrains from loosening monetary policy to tame inflation and curb property prices.

“They slammed on the brakes,” Shilling, president of A. Gary Shilling & Co., a Springfield, New Jersey-based consultancy firm, said at the Bloomberg Link China Conference in New York yesterday. “Transition is not easy because they are geared up to exports.”

China’s economy expanded 10.4 percent annually in the past 10 years, five times the pace of the US, as the government boosted spending on roads and bridges and manufacturers exported everything from toys to socks. Shilling defines a hard landing as a growth rate below 6 percent.

The economy grew at a 9.2 percent rate in 2011 and its expansion will slow to 8.5 percent this year, according to economists’ estimates compiled by Bloomberg.

Shilling, 74, has been calling for a hard landing in China since at least a year ago, advising clients to sell copper and the Australian dollar as a play on the downturn.

Shilling forecast the US recession in 2007 and warned investors a year earlier that residential real estate was a bubble about to burst. As the Standard & Poor’s 500 index fell [to] a more-than 12-year low in March 2009, he said that higher unemployment would curb consumer spending, leading to “weaker stocks.” The gauge has since rallied 96 percent.

Nobody can be right all the time. Even here at The Daily Reckoning, our timing is occasionally off — by a year or two. After all, we figured the US stock index, the Dow, would be down to 6,000 by now. We thought the post-crisis bounce would have come to an end years ago. Instead, the Dow is over 12,000…and still bouncing along.

But give it time!

Bill Bonner
for The Daily Reckoning

How to Prolong an Inevitable Market Correction originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas.

Each of the Davos-list celebrities to write on the subject basically ‘talks his own book.’ The politicians tell us that they can fix what is wrong with capitalism. The regulators want more regulations; do-gooders urge us to rely more on good works. The economists have their economic solutions. The entrepreneurs put their faith in can-do hustlers.

Bill Clinton used to be a sharp politician. Now, judging from his comments in the FT, he has moved rapidly from becoming an elder statesman to the kind of senility that affects aging world improvers. Try to figure out what this means:

“Governments, businesses and extra-governmental organizations [can] work together to share expertise and implement lasting solutions…

“What we need is innovation, imagination and commitment. The most effective global citizens will be those who succeed in merging their business and philanthropic missions to build a future of shared prosperity and shared responsibility.”

Those are words that could have been written by a dull-witted robot…or Thomas Friedman.

The words were empty; at least they were not stupid. But there were plenty of stupid words, too, in the series. A representative of Occupy London wrote to say that Friedrich Hayek had “helped us to find capitalism’s flaws.” Hayek pointed out that the widely distributed knowledge of a market economy was much better for making decisions than the centralized information and planning of a state-directed system. But the Occupy writer missed the point completely. He quoted Hayek and then went on to suggest the very sort of meddles that Hayek warned against.

Some writers seemed to have nothing to say whatever. Others seemed to have nothing to say about capitalism; it was as if they had not thought about it. And some, we couldn’t figure out what they were talking about.

All in all, the series has been a big letdown. Capitalism has no real friends and no clear defenders, not at the FT.

We will have to do the job ourselves. Look for our ‘Capitalists’ Manifesto’…

…next week.

Regards,

Bill Bonner
for The Daily Reckoning

A Crisis in Worthwhile Opinions of Capitalism originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas.

What is most interesting is the movement in the price of gold. It seems to be heading up again — almost no matter what else is happening.

So, let’s look at what might be going on…

If investors sensed a recovery…they would expect banks to lend more freely…people to shop more freely…and prices to rise.

This would raise consumer prices; the price of gold should go up.

But if the market sees growth and inflation ahead, why is oil slipping? And why is the Baltic Dry Index — which measures shipping prices — at a 25-year low? And how come last month’s employment figures were disappointing? And why aren’t stock market prices going up?

Most important, if the economy is really recovering, why is the 10-year note yielding only 1.82%? And what about the long bond? Shouldn’t it be trading at a yield higher than 3%?

And how come house prices fell over the last year…and the last month?

And how come incomes are falling?

Or, to look at it from the opposite point of view, how is it possible for a real recovery to take root in the hard, barren soil of falling house prices and slipping consumer earnings?

But if the economy is not improving…then there should be no increase in inflation…and no pressure on the price of gold, right?

Maybe investors don’t anticipate a recovery at all. Maybe they’re buying gold because they see the economy getting worse, not better. We associate a rise in the price of gold with inflation. But gold is much more versatile than we think. It protects your wealth when paper money loses its value. It also protects your wealth when paper money gains in value. It protects you when you are right…and when you are wrong.

How so?

During the Great Depression, for example, the price of gold rose…against dollars…even though the prices of food, clothing and other consumer items…as well as the prices of investment assets…were falling in dollar terms. Why? Because money gains value — relative to things — in a depression. Gold is money. It is the best money. It is the only money that has stood the test of time.

Besides, there is more going on. In a financial crisis…or a depression…investors begin to doubt that their counterparties will make good. Banks fail. Investors go broke. You own a mortgage, and then you discover that the homeowner has left town…and the house has lost half its value. You own a note, and then you discover than the payer is bankrupt; your note is worthless. You own shares in a company; and then the company goes out of business.

When you are in a de-leveraging phase, you discover that many of the assets of the previous credit bubble are not assets at all. And while you’re waiting to find out, the best thing to have in your safe is gold.

As uncertainty rises; so does the price of gold.

The price of gold also rises when the return on other assets declines. At 1.82%, the real return on a 10-year T-note is negative. Consumer prices are rising faster. So, the reward for lending to the government is less than zero.

Normally, holding gold costs you money. You give up the return you could get from ‘risk free’ investments (Treasury debt). Now, you give up the risk from reward-free investments.

Gold goes nowhere. It produces no yield. It pays no dividends. It makes no profits. You can’t live in it. You can’t drive it. You can’t hang it on your wall and admire it.

But when the return on Treasury debt is negative, what do you give up by owning gold? You give up a loss!

You also give up the risk of a much bigger loss. The Fed is bound and determined to bring up the inflation rate. Ben Bernanke has suggested that he might set the inflation target higher than 2%. He has announced that he will keep the Fed’s key lending rate near zero for the next 3 years. He has hinted that he is ready to print more money — QEIII — if conditions warrant.

Holding gold protects you from Bernanke’s success. For if he succeeds in raising the rate of inflation, gold will surely soar. And there is substantial risk — bordering on certainty — that he will be no better at creating moderately more inflation than he has been at creating moderately more GDP growth.

It is quite possible that he will overshoot.

Normally, inflation is a feature of the banking system. The system takes the Fed’s monetary grubstake and parleys it into the nation’s money supply. Banks magnify the money supply by lending…and thereby create more demand, which raises prices. They do this by making loans…to people who then spend the money.

This sort of inflation is controllable, by raising interest rates and tightening banking credit rules. But there’s another form of inflation. The kind that starts with an “h.”

Hyperinflation happens when the banking system breaks down. People lose faith in the money itself…and the people who control it. Foreign dollar holders may worry that the Fed is printing too much money. It may even be good economic news that causes them distress; they may anticipate higher inflation rates, and a sell-off of the dollar, which would lower the value of their dollar reserves. They may figure that they are better off diversifying into yuan…or gold.

Then, when other investors and householders see the dollar falling…they get panicky too. Pretty soon, people are digging around in drawers, bank accounts and mattresses…looking for dollars — just so they can get rid of them.

That is when dollars hit the hyperinflationary fan. Our old friend Michael Checkan tells what it was like in Argentina in the late ’80s:

“Imagine a $2.00 gallon of milk spiking to $775.40 within a year — like in Argentina, 1988.”

Bill Bonner
for The Daily Reckoning

Buying Gold in Uncertain Times originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas.

In a recent column he tells us that “Average is over.” Typically, it makes no sense. What Friedman seems to mean is that an average person can’t expect to do very well in today’s America. He says average guys are being replaced by robots and Chinese people.

There’s even a new device that will make waiters obsolete. You go into a restaurant. You find a computer at your table. You use it to order your food.

Okay, so what?

Friedman strings together words into things that look like sentences that sound as though they have meaning. But if you stop to think about them, even for a second, you realize that there is no meaning there.

Perhaps he might be replaced by a computer. It could be programmed to create things that resembled real thoughts.

“Everyone needs to find their [sic] extra — their unique value contribution that makes them stand out in whatever is their field of employment.

“Average is over.”

So, let’s imagine that people take this advice, whatever it is. They find their extra. They all stand out. Then, what have you got? You have a different average, don’t you? The average fellow has an extra. So, if the average guy has an extra…he has no extra at all, does he? He can’t stand out in a field of outstanding guys.

Average isn’t over. Extra is over.

But Freidman persists. He notices statistics that purport to show that the average college graduate suffers less unemployment than the average high school graduate. This leads him to propose that the feds spend billions more to send more people to college.

But wait a minute. Does the job pool expand just because you’ve fluffed up the average resume? Or do you merely have more people with college degrees competing with computer programs to wait on tables?

We don’t know. But we’re damned sure Friedman has no clue either.

Regards,

Bill Bonner
for The Daily Reckoning

Thomas Friedman and the End of “Average” originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas.

We drove back into town on Sunday night. People moped around in front of bars. Groups walked uptown from the stadium, their shoulders down, the chins dragging. The city was dark…and unhappy.

There was no joy in Baltimore on Sunday night. Baltimore is a sports town. The Ravens — the only team we know named after a poem — had lost. They would not be going to the Super Bowl.

Baltimore is a funny place. We were happy to leave it for 15 years when we lived in Europe. And we are happy to be back. Living in Europe was hard. Here it is easy. Living in Europe was chic and fashionable. Here, moving to a trailer park would be moving up in the world. Living in Europe was expensive. Baltimore, meanwhile, is one of the cheapest cities in the world.

But we’ll come back to Baltimore in a minute…

What’s in the news today? The Dow rose 83 points yesterday. The 30-year, ‘long’ bond yield dropped below 3%. The price of gold rose to $1,749.

Bond yields signal a recession. Stocks hint at a recovery… Gold? The correction in the gold market didn’t go nearly as far as we expected. And now it’s over. What to make of it? Do people expect inflation? Why are they buying gold?

We know why the Syrians are buying gold. There’s a war on. Gold has always been the thing to own in a war zone. But here, people think the economy is recovering.

The public and the investoriat seem to think all is well. We’ve just had one of our best months in stock market history. Many investors are convinced that it is the beginning of something big.

Our old friend Mark Hulbert, for example, tells us that some of the oldest and wisest of the newsletter gurus are now bullish on stocks.

We don’t have any opinion about stocks. We just don’t like them. And we figure that if they were as valuable as people think, the owners wouldn’t be in such a hurry to unload them. At least, not to us. Instead, they’d hold on.

But some people are always selling. Others always seem to be buying. Prices go up…and down…the world goes ’round and ’round…

…and who are we to argue with it?

The trouble is, the economy is not nearly as strong as most people think. There is no growth to speak of. And without growth, it doesn’t make sense to pay so much for stocks. Forbes:

The Q4 2011 GDP reading of +2.8% produced what may appear to be a respectable headline number, a full percentage point above Q3 GDP growth of 1.8%. On the surface, the Q4 report also compared favorably to an increase in real GDP of 1.7% for all of 2011. But 2.8%, even at first look, is still softer than the 3.0% gain in real GDP logged for 2010, repeating a pattern that we’ve seen over the past few years: GDP rises, only to drop off again.

Although it may be tempting to look at the economy as a glass that’s half full, I’m afraid it’s far emptier than it looks. Diving into the Q4 GDP report, we see that two-thirds of the amount of growth reported (1.9%) was due to private inventory build-up. (According to standard accounting practice, growth in inventory increases GDP, while sales of inventory reduces it.) Drilling further, the stat that is most meaningful is the real final sales of domestic product — GDP minus the change in private inventories. This data point eked out only a 0.8% increase in Q4 2011, compared with an increase of 3.2% in Q3 2011. That is very telling.

Another weakness in consumer spending was reported by the Commerce Department: Personal income grew by 0.5% in December, up from a 0.1% rise in November. Spending was flat, however. The personal saving rate, meanwhile, was 4.0% in December, compared to 3.5% in November. Saving instead of spending may be good for consumers’ personal balances sheets, but it doesn’t do much good for an economy that needs to gain traction. Additionally, sales increases still appear to be driven by increases in debt which is not sustainable.

Without growth, the average stock will go nowhere. How could it? There’s nowhere to go. No growth means that the economy is no larger at the end of the year than it was at the beginning. So, for any company to grow, it would have to take sales and profits from some other company. For one to grow another must shrink. Overall, there would be no growth, and no capital gains for investors.

Trouble is the dividend yield of the stock market is only around 2%. That’s not enough. Take inflation and taxes into account, says our Family Office strategist, Rob Marstrand, and you need more than an 8% return just to break even.

So, if you’re buying stocks in a no-growth market…with a 2% dividend yield…you’re losing 6% on your money.

Heck, you’re much better off buying gold…or property in Baltimore.

Gold has been up every year for the last 11. Even last year, when it supposedly suffered a big correction, it still ended the year up about $300 — which is what you would have paid for a whole ounce of gold in 1999.

As for Baltimore real estate…

We’ve been looking at apartment buildings in B’more. This city is unusual, so you probably shouldn’t generalize. But we’re seeing buildings with “cap rates” of 10% and more…and return on cash as high as 20%. Interest rates are so low you can finance much of the purchase price at low cost…and leverage your investment to get a higher return.

How does that work? Well, the building we just looked at had 5 units. The sales agent explained it to us.

“You get gross rents of about $100,000 and you can buy the building for $800,000. You put down $100,000 and borrow the other $700,000. Then, you pay off your mortgage, pay the upkeep, property taxes, utilities and so forth… You also have to pay management…leave an allowance for vacancies and major repairs…and you end up with about $20,000.

“That’s your return on cash. Not bad, huh?”

Well, it’s about 10 times what you can expect from the stock market.

Trouble is…trouble. Being a landlord in an inner city is trouble. You get trouble from the tenants. Trouble from the city. Trouble from the pipes, the roof, the wires…lead…asbestos — everything. Buy city apartment buildings and you are asking for trouble.

But if you can handle the trouble, hey…see you in Charm City.

Bill Bonner
for The Daily Reckoning

Investment Alternatives in a No-Growth Market originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas.

“It’s amazing. I’ve lived there all my life. But I’m a little different, I guess. My brothers are doctors and lawyers. I did them a favor by being the black sheep of the family. So they didn’t have to be.

“I live in a rich neighborhood. But I don’t work much. I can’t work at all now, since I had my motorcycle accident. And I guess people wonder how I could live in such a place. Well, the answer is simple. My father was an eye surgeon and he bought it in 1941 and gave it to his children when he died.

“Well, somehow, the idea got out that we were drug dealers. The police started keeping an eye on us. There was an old van parked on the property. They figured it was for transporting drugs. And then, I had a couple of Mexicans helping me on the farm. They figured those guys must be drug runners. I don’t know how it all happened, because I’ve been there for more than 60 years…and anyone could have asked me what was going on.

“But one night, I’m in bed and these guys in combat gear bust down the door and point rifles at me and my wife. It was a SWAT team of some sort. And then my son came home. They asked him what he was doing there. He told them he lived there. So they arrested him too…

“Of course, the door wasn’t even locked. They could have just turned the doorknob. But I guess that wouldn’t have been so exciting…

“They let me out of jail in a matter of hours…but only after signing a paper saying we wouldn’t sue the police for false arrest, etc. If I didn’t sign the paper they said the arrest would be on my son’s record for life…”

How do things like that happen? How do the police and drug enforcement agencies make such a mistake?

Well, there’s a lot of money in the drug trade…and not just for the people who traffic in drugs. The drug dealers make money. The drug fighters make money too. In short, the illegal drug industry has been zombified.

The dealers make money because the drug fighters restrict supply, keeping prices, and profit margins, high. The drug fighters make money because they are on the front lines in the war against drugs! They put on uniforms and pretend to be combating serious crime. They get jobs, helicopters, cars, guns, sophisticated machinery…and much more.

And then, when they actually catch someone with drugs, the lawyers come into the picture…and the prosecutors…and the prisons. Guess what is said to be the most powerful single lobbying organization in the state of California? Prison guards! The whole thing is immensely profitable. Everyone wants a piece of it.

The war on drugs may be a colossal waste of money and a stain on America’s escutcheon, with millions of dollars wasted and thousands of people sent to prison for no good reason. But neither the drug dealers nor the drug fighters want to see it come to an end.

Regards,

Bill Bonner,
for The Daily Reckoning

Zombiefied Drug Trade originally appeared in the Daily Reckoning. The Daily Reckoning, published by Agora Financial provides over 400,000 global readers economic news, market analysis, and contrarian investment ideas.