01/09/10 Taipei, Taiwan – Last weekend your editor attended an Italian opera at the National Theater here in Taiwan. The actors were all petite locals, but that didn’t stop them from belting out arias in a sonorous enough fashion to make the fattest Italian leading lady blush. The audience consisted of well-to-do academic types and business people. Men came in dapper suits and the women wore silks and fine coral jewelry. It was a far cry from what you might expect from a society that, only a few generations ago, was largely agrarian-based.
As the orchestra’s notes filled the plush, cavernous hall, we wondered, “Could this be the new Asia? The Asia of the future?” Those who dream of a great global economic recovery certainly hope so. Now that the American consumer is all but tapped out, they look to Asian producers to fill the demand gap. But one opening night does not make a season, as those in the industry might say.
Taiwan is not all Lucia di Lammermoor’s and lorgnettes, of course. Far from it. Indeed, few places we’ve visited in Asia more abundantly furnish the senses with the rich/poor, old/new dichotomies so prevalent around this region. Just outside the concert hall, for instance, looms a giant bronze statue of Chiang Kai-shek, a stark and foreboding reminder of the not-so-distant past when the tiny South China Sea island was plunged into chaos and routine class purges.
Ever since Kuomintang (KMT) Chairman Chiang, the one-time friend and later arch nemesis of Chairman Mao Tse-Tung, fled to Taiwan (or Formosa, the Portuguese name meaning “beautiful [island]”) in 1949, the place has been a hotbed of political friction. Naturally, not all locals welcomed Chiang’s heavy-handed, authoritarian rule. There was plenty of bloodshed in the streets under Chiang’s “White Terror” and masses of dispossessed citizens rebelled against his iron fist. But Chiang did have a few things going for him. When the KMT party arrived in Taiwan, they brought with them a huge portion of the mainland’s gold and foreign currency reserves. Much of the intellectual and business elite also followed in order to avoid the communist crush of Mao’s “Reds” back home. And, vitally and with the help of aid from the US, the KMT also instituted an import-substitution policy, whereby the country began to manufacture previously imported goods domestically. This policy was to prove an invaluable part of the small island’s economic growth in subsequent years.
After Chiang, the increasingly capitalistic, export-driven Taiwan grew its foreign reserves exponentially. Today it has the fourth largest stash in the world, behind only China, Japan and Russia. (As a point of interest, the US comes in 21st on the rankings, right between Poland and Libya.)
It’s not difficult to imagine a place like Taiwan, one of Asia’s four “Tiger Economies” (alongside Singapore, Hong Kong and South Korea), leading some kind of regional renaissance. But the plot here is just as much tragedy as it is comedy.
For one thing, a not-insignificant portion of the island’s 23 million people still lives hand to mouth. Your editor buys his fresh fruit and vegetables from a local night market right next to his building, where vendors shuttle their produce in from farms in the surrounding mountains on the back of smoke-spluttering mopeds. These people work long, hard hours and are by no means equipped to pick up the conspicuously lagging consumption duties abandoned by their cash-strapped American cousins. The lines on their smiling faces run deep with the stresses and pains of the recent past and of a life spent laboring for little in return.
Not two stops away on the world’s most advanced underground metro system, Taiwan’s tallest building, Taipei 101 (the world’s highest until the Burj Dubai opened earlier this month), towers as the centerpiece of the high-end retail area surrounding the City Hall. Streets there are lined with luxury items form Paris, Milan and Seoul. Vacationing shoppers gorge themselves on Hermès handbags and Prada pumps, the price tags of which would have been unimaginable here a few years ago.
To be sure, the island has come a long, long way over the past five or six decades. Where agriculture once made up more than one third of the GDP here, it now contributes less than 2%. The lion’s share of economic activity today belongs to the booming information technology and biotech industries. Semiconductors sales are a source of national university pride and cutting edge companies like Acer (TSE: 2353), Asus (TSE: 2357) and HTC Corporation (TSE: 2498) churn out $300 laptops and smartphones by the ton, which they then pump into hungry foreign markets.
But it is important to remember, especially when considering export driven/reliant economies, that not all demand is created equal. There is the kind forged in the crucible of the free market, rooted in sound money and underpinned by the desires of real people. Then there is the phantom, government-sponsored kind, masquerading behind a cloak of public stimulus boondoggles and debased currencies. Administrations from DC to Beijing and beyond are guilty of exactly this act of economic sleight of hand.
It is impossible to know exactly how much of the world’s current demand is real and how much is simply manufactured by make-work governments looking to pad their GDP figures with public works programs and easy money handouts. We’ve written in this space before about how liquidity inflows from the West, coupled with loose monetary policies locally, have pushed property prices and stock markets in China to bubble-like valuations.
Dan Denning, our mate who heads up the Aussie chapter of The Daily Reckoning, spent the week there warning his readers of China’s overly ambitious capital outlays.
“Now it would be presumptuous to say that all Chinese capital spending was somehow derivative of American consumer demand,” observes Dan. “China has other trading partners and markets, although without America things might not be so flash. But it is without doubt true that Chinese capital spending is a direct consequence of the global credit bubble.”
The faux demand plot is yet to fully reveal itself on the world economic stage, but it would be foolish to assume export dependent economies have not grown somewhat accustomed to bloated order books. Taiwan’s generational gains are hard fought and the people here are among the most intelligent, driven individuals we’ve ever met. It is hard to ignore, however, that on both sides of the Pacific an over-consuming, publicly-funded “Chi-merican” fat lady may already be singing her swansong.
Joel Bowman
Joel Bowman is managing editor of The Daily Reckoning. After completing his degree in media communications and journalism in his home country of Australia, Joel moved to Baltimore to join the Agora Financial team. His keen interest in travel and macroeconomics first took him to New York where he regularly reported from Wall Street, and he now writes from and lives all over the world.
The Daily Reckoning is your premier source for making sense of the news Washington and Wall Street generate. Each business day, The Daily Reckoning calls on its stable of world-class writers and thinkers to show you how to get ahead.
Start your 100% FREE subscription to The Daily Reckoning today and you’ll get a free research report, “How to Survive the Fall of Social Security.” Simply enter your email address below to get your free report and join over 495,000 worldwide Daily Reckoning subscribers!
We Respect Your Privacy and We will
Never Share or Sell Your Email Address
Why does Taiwan need hundred’s of US made Patriot missles? China also wonders:
“Under the present backdrop of the peaceful development of the Taiwan Strait, the US insistence to sell arms to Taiwan would undermine the overall interests of China-US relations,” said Yang Yi, a strategic expert with National Defense University of China.
“It may also damage the interests of the United States itself,” Yang said
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2010-01/09/content_9291821.htm
Dear Sir.
This is a most profoundly descriptive article with regards to “the benefits of economic progress” that are provided by a heavy-handed, iron-fisted, authoritarian ruler with his following of “intellectual and business elite”, leading to a group of foreign “cutting edge companies” invading what was once a seemingly peaceful, agrarian-based, non-polluting place called “beautiful island”.
You speak of “exponential growth of foreign reserves”, a “most advanced underground metro system”, of well-to-do academic types and business people attending an Italian opera at the National Theater. You speak of wealthy tourists/vacationers visiting the tall buildings and high-end retail businesses surrounding the City Hall.
So, who is it that has benefited from this extraordinary transformation? Is it the “non-insignificant portion of the island’s 23 million people” who “still lives hand to mouth”? Or is it the invaders of the culture, the rapers of the islands’ ecology, the intellectuals and the business elite, the cutting edge companies?
“To be sure the island has come a long, long way over the past five or six decades”….. The island has come a long, long way to exactly “what” over these past decades? To an epitome of cultural achievement where-in “Semiconductors sales are a source of national university pride”?
I seriously would like an answer to this if any one might know:
What exactly is “national university pride”? Do they have a “National University” that takes pride in semiconductor sales?
Does anyone know the Portuguese translation for “Tiger Economy Island”?
Perhaps “Formosa” no longer applies.
Dear Joel,
Arguably, the 4 tigers are merely tools or puppets of the US. US propped up the 4
mainly through the so-called “most favourable trading terms”. “What you sell I buy, even at a premium price.” A process of enriching the 4 which is equivalent to enriching U235. This was done to create imbalance among the Asians and eventually brought the socialist states to a full stop. Agree ?
US is still biased and tilts towards its subordinates. IQ of a group cannot be determined in a couple of decades. A temporary behaviour of a stock doesn’t represents its mean movement. Simirlary, the sudden pop up of IQ of a group in comparison to millennia backwardness, needs thorough research.
Look ! someone said they were selling gold and ends up with plenty of stock.
By a “castling”, greenback drop to a couple of cents and there4 treasury bonds effectively nullified. Eastern fortunate moves back to Western. Accept the title of “intelligent”, for it still belong to Westerners. Note, the “Title” is non-transferable and not negotiable at all. Hmm !
…the four tigers, each for a time america’s most favourite lover…oooo america, the breeze will carry my loving manufactured wares to your shores, and together we will share our laments echoing in the murmuring sea…think of the sorrow and suffering should we grow separate, whisper thy technologistical secrets in my ear, and let our love conquer the world…
Dear Mike,
If such was the scenario, such was the ongoing global game … someone’s favourite lover, might well be others’ traitor.
No hard feeling, only comment and opinion.
Have a nice day !
The Asian Tigers were given:
(a) Technology,
(b) Capital, and
(c) market access to the huge post 1945 American market.
This was done to create an iron fence against advancing socialism.
In addition to this, other countries in Africa etc were denied these opportunities. This partly explains the poverty there and thereby, the inability to consume manufactured goods.
Therefore, the fast development in these so called Asian Tigers must be seen in this light.
Unfortunately, based on these arrangements, the industrial world is now operating below 3/4 industrial capacity due to over capacity.
The question then is, why this over capacity?
It is very simple. Under the current free trade, i.e. neo – mercantilist arrangements, the workers in developing nations like China are paid peanuts.
Likewise, the Western workers who lose jobs in the manufacturing sector end up with low wages.
This means that, the workers in developing nations cannot afford what they produce, and the workers in the developed nations cannot also afford these products without incurring debts. This explains the necessity to create debts in developed nations. Unfortunately, the debt era has now come to an end.
But who benefits from these arrangements? The companies/imperialists sitted in offshore for they get the lion share from these arrangements. However, these few guys cannot buy all the manufactured goods they are manufacturing. In the end, all will be losers in this neo – mercantilism in the name of free trade.
Dear mwarang’ethe,
“This was done to create an iron fence against advancing socialism.”
Actually, that was done not only to deter but to crumble socialism. Am I right ?
Look ! the Berlin wall crumbled. For instance, As I have said before, the Chinese ladies would otherwise work decently helping out in the farm productively. But, many are now flying internationally in search of paper money even with their most “primitive tool”. This would certainly be termed couter-productive during Mao era or dismissed by any civilised society. This is only one of the vivid illustrations. Shame has given way to $hameless.
At the very least, peasant would labour hard productively in the commune. I am sure we have a purpose of coming to this world. Isn’t ?
But look now, people shuttle here and there. For What ? US churning up trillions of debt and where to find social order ? Can we take a slower step instead of advancing aggressively at such a great expense ?
Would it be better to keep 2 systems, capitalism and socialism side by side ?
When the 2 systems collide or knock each other, they produce wonderful spark of life.