Have you seen the news reports about the awful air pollution across China? With all its breakneck growth over the past 25 years or so, the words “air pollution” and China are almost one and the same. Chinese growth has created huge investment opportunities, in recent years. But now we’re at a critical point in the “China story,” where Chinese air pollution is investable, too.
Hint: Think platinum and palladium.
Air pollution in the Middle Kingdom is downright awful. Beijing often disappears into a thick, “pea soup” of smog which reduces visibility to just a few feet, in many instances.
On Jan. 12, an air monitor atop the US Embassy in Beijing recorded an astonishing 755-reading by the Air Quality Index devised by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). For perspective, this scale usually goes no higher than 500. Furthermore, the EPA considers any reading above 100 to be “unhealthy for sensitive groups.” Readings above 400 are “hazardous” for everyone.
Air pollution is so bad, in fact, that the usually taciturn Chinese leadership is permitting public discussion about the issue, in that “we’ve got to do something” sort of way.
No less than the hardline, Communist party mouthpiece People’s Daily newspaper asked, in a front page editorial the other day, “How can we get out of this suffocating siege of pollution?”
In a recent interview with the South China Morning Post, Qu Geping, China’s Minister of Environmental Protection between 1987 and 1993, stated, “I have to admit that (national and local) governments have done far from enough to rein in the wild pursuit of economic growth, and failed to avoid some of the worst pollution scenarios we, as policymakers, had predicted.”
This is about as close to admitting a mistake as China’s top-down government will ever come.
Let’s peer just a bit further behind the Great Wall. Why, exactly, is the air so bad in China, just now? Well, it’s winter, and the wind isn’t blowing the air pollution out to sea, and over towards Korea and Japan, which is the usual pathway of nature.
Chinese air pollution casts a “global shadow,” according to several years’ worth of science reporting in The New York Times. Here in North America, air monitoring stations up and down the west coast — California to British Columbia — routinely trigger alarms when clouds of Chinese pollution arrive, essentially intact, after a trans-Pacific journey.
At least 30% of the air pollution on the US west coast is attributable directly to “imported” Chinese clouds of gunk, according to Chemical & Engineering News.
But blowing China’s air pollution out to sea, and over to California, is a “non-solution” to a critical problem — and a temporary one, at that. The key is to find the origins of China’s air pollution problem. China needs to go to the source.
The worst of China’s air pollution, just now, is comprised of fine particulates. It’s the small stuff that forms into smog, gets into peoples’ lungs and causes all manner of other health and safety problems.
What’s the origin? Well, most of the really bad material in China’s air comes from uncontrolled diesel exhaust. This exhaust spews from the tailpipes of literally millions of trucks and other diesel vehicles that ply China’s roads, as well as innumerable electrical generators that back-up China’s unreliable power grid.
As I dug into the news accounts of the air pollution crisis in China, over the past couple of weeks, I found a few (very few!) references to the widespread lack of catalytic converters on most Chinese trucks and stationary diesel generators.
According to one account, from the Associated Press, emission control devices can add up to $3,200 to the price of a truck or large generator. According to John Zeng, of the research firm LMC Automotive, Ltd., “It’s not a problem of technology. It’s more about consumer affordability. Increasing the emissions standard greatly increases the cost.”
Look back over the past quarter century of development in China. China was a “poor” country, in that its economic starting point was very low on the development ladder. It’s no wonder that vehicle- and generator-buyers didn’t want to spend “extra” money, up front, for pollution-control equipment.
This kind of micro-economic choice may have made sense for the individual buyer, over the past 25 years or so. But when you add it all up, and calculate the long-term, macro-effect? Now China has millions of vehicles that lack catalytic controls. It’s no wonder that China’s air is so fouled.
China has reached its pollution tipping point. The Chinese are going to have to do something before they suffocate to death.
What’s the key part of that $3,200 “extra” price for emission control? It’s the catalytic converter. In particular, it’s the cost of platinum and/or palladium metal that catalyzes the chemical reactions that dramatically reduce exhaust emissions. Without these scarce metals, no one can manufacture a catalytic converter. So platinum and palladium are essential metals for these attachments to diesel engines.
Palladium, in particular, is in the spotlight since it is the metal of choice for catalytic converters in diesel engines. And as the chart below illustrates, annual auto-catalyst demand is currently soaking up a whopping 81% of the world’s annual mined supply of palladium — up from about 60% just a few years ago.
This chart also illustrates that the palladium price trend tracks very closely with the auto-catalyst demand trend. Back in 2000, for example, when auto-catalyst demand was consuming more than 100% of the mined supply (above-ground stockpiles plugged the supply gap), the palladium priced soared to more than $1,000 an ounce!
Which brings us back to China and its pollution problem, which is literally “off the charts.” There’s reason to believe that the Chinese will start requiring more emission control devices on all new trucks and generators, if not requiring retro-fit to older models. And what will this do to demand for platinum and palladium? It’s going to rise, and prices will strengthen.
The bottom line is that we’re looking at an entire nation — China — awakening to the problems of air pollution. The engineering solution is that China must solve its problems by increasing the use of catalytic converters on its fleet of diesel engines. This can only be good for platinum and palladium demand and pricing, going forward.
Invest in emission control by investing in platinum and palladium.
Byron Kingfor The Daily Reckoning
Today I write to you with an irony-free letter. No out- of-step ideas. No irritating reflections. Instead, I offer you two ways to take advantage of the coming bear market rally – if there is to be one. Or, merely a chance to buy stocks that are good enough and cheap enough that you could […]
Byron King is the managing editor of Outstanding Investments and Energy & Scarcity Investor. He is a Harvard-trained geologist who has traveled to every U.S. state and territory and six of the seven continents. He has conducted site visits to mineral deposits in 26 countries and deep-water oil fields in five oceans. This provides him with a unique perspective on the myriad of investment opportunities in energy and mineral exploration. He has been interviewed by dozens of major print and broadcast media outlets including The Financial Times, The Guardian, The Washington Post, MSN Money, MarketWatch, Fox Business News, and PBS Newshour.
Platinum is the metal of choice for diesel catylitic converters not palladium. Palladium is chiefly used in gas engines.
palladium please !
As long as markets exist, there will people who try to predict where they are headed. Of course, no one can know for sure. And as Greg Guenthner explains, their prognostications can sometimes do more harm than good. Read on...
A massive storm recently blanketed the U.S. northeast. And as it did, most people ran to their thermostats to keep warm. But staying warm and cozy this winter comes at a price, even with the U.S. nat gas boom in full swing. Today, Matt Insley explains why, when it comes to nat gas prices, seasonality definitely matters. Read on...
Like it or not, size does matter. But contrary to a popular saying, bigger is not always better. Especially when it comes to the size of the state. Marc Faber explains why a world of smaller states might function better than one dominated by excessively large "superpowers." Read on...
Pope Francis recently warned people to beware the "tyranny" of capitalism. Hmmm... Would that be true capitalism and trust in free enterprise? Or the crony capitalism we're currently saddled with? Bill Bonner explains why, even though capitalism is easily corrupted by the capitalists, that doesn't necessarily mean it is a bum creed. Read on...
Income inequality in the U.S. has reached epic proportions. So much so that "1%" is no longer just a simple fraction. Now it's now much more than that, used as a pejorative symbol of excessive wealth and the greed of the American upper class. Marc Faber explains why this is unfair, especially as regards U.S. tax laws. Read on...
The average postwar U.S. expansion has lasted 58 months. In the midst of major policy dislocation in Congress and at the Fed, we are at month 52 of the current expansion, which began in June 2009. But we are running out of time – and luck.