China’s new aspirations have the power to radically change not only the relationship between the U.S. and China, but also between America and rest of the world.
The fact that the dollar is the nominal world reserve currency today is really quite a pretty advantage for the U.S.
On a recent trip to South Africa they didn’t talk about how many rand an ounce of gold was selling for, they were talking dollars; same for oil. And it goes beyond pricing. If we need more oil and we don’t have currency to spare, that’s okay. We just print our own money, use it to buy the oil, and the Saudis take it because the dollar’s the reserve currency.
But on the day that the dollar becomes a less useful reserve currency, we have a problem.
For example, we could approach the Saudis and say, “we need a tanker full of oil,” and they could say, “Well, okay, you can pay us in Chinese yuan.” But we don’t have any Chinese yuan, so they say, “then we don’t have any oil for you.”
That’s not a problem that the U.S. has dealt with in modern history.
It is, however, a problem other countries deal with now. When Mexico needs to import natural gas and the seller says, “that’ll be so many dollars,” if Mexico says, “Oh, we’re all out of foreign exchange,” they can’t import the gas. It’s that simple, they can’t print U.S. dollars so they’re out of luck.
So anyhow, having your currency be the world’s reserve currency is an enviable position. That’s especially so, when it comes to raw materials like energy, minerals, food, and paying for whatever you import.
The Chinese likely think we have abused the position. Like I said, think like China. We’ve abused the position of our strong dollar to dominate the world, to dominate world trade, to dominate world politics. They’d like to see the U.S. come down off the hill, and the same thing with the Europeans. But they’re cautious and patience.
China’s Slow Play
So if you’re China right now, you’re trying to break the stranglehold the dollar has over your economy, but you’re sanguine enough to understand that at this point you’re not going to knock the U.S. completely off its pedestal.
And remember, the Chinese don’t want to be No. 1 now, because if you’re No. 1, what’s everybody else in the world trying to do? They’re trying to knock you off. They’re trying to knock you down.
So if you’re China, why do you want to put yourself in that position? No, if you’re China you simply want to compete. Although it sounds strange for a Communist country, domination can wait.
In the short-term then, what I would see happening after 2015 is China using their Treasury holdings (and their gold hoard) as leverage to turn the SDR basket more favorable to China’s economic interest. Maybe China gets a seat at the table and the yuan is added to the SDR basket? Maybe there’s a component of gold in the basket? Either outcome benefits China’s position.
On top of that we could see China try to convert its U.S. Treasury holdings into more of the freshly-balanced SDRs.
Indeed, the Chinese would be stupid not to understand that every year of inflation reduces the overall purchasing power of the $1.2 trillion they hold in U.S. Bonds.
Yeah, it’s a great big monetary shell game. We have these SDRs, and China walks to the table and says, “Okay, we have these American Treasuries, so we’re going to post our Treasuries against the IMF, and we will take an equivalent SDR in return.”
And getting back to what I said earlier, it’s very likely that the SDRs are going to have a gold-backed component; whereas right now U.S. Treasury bonds have zero gold-backed component.
And if I’m China, some gold is better than no gold. I’d rather have 100 percent gold-backed currency, but if I can’t get currency backed at 100 percent I’ll take 50 percent, I’ll take 20 percent. I’ll take whatever’s better than zero, which is where China’s current holdings of U.S. Treasuries stand. This is a dynamic situation, but that’s what I think is going on. And that’s what I think we can look forward to over the next two years – a sea-change in the global monetary system.
So that’s my big, huge, arm-waving macroeconomic argument for why the next couple of years are going to be very, very good for gold investors and why 2015 is going be spectacularly good for gold investors.
Up until now there has been a slow, more or less steady rise in the price of gold – you know, $1,000, $1,200, $1,500 — and the next couple of years could bring prices of $2,000, $2,500, $3,000 an ounce.
But by 2015 when the SDR revision kicks in and everybody realizes what’s going on, I think we could see gold rally substantially from its current price to north of $2,500. On the high end we could see an order of magnitude change in the price of gold from $2,500 to say $25,000 an ounce!
Right now only few sort of far-out thinkers are talking about this. Hopefully you’re one of them.
Original article posted on Daily Resource Hunter
Byron King is the editor of Outstanding Investments, Byron King's Military-Tech Alert, and Real Wealth Trader. He is a Harvard-trained geologist who has traveled to every U.S. state and territory and six of the seven continents. He has conducted site visits to mineral deposits in 26 countries and deep-water oil fields in five oceans. This provides him with a unique perspective on the myriad of investment opportunities in energy and mineral exploration. He has been interviewed by dozens of major print and broadcast media outlets including The Financial Times, The Guardian, The Washington Post, MSN Money, MarketWatch, Fox Business News, and PBS Newshour.
Sounds right to me. I would have liked to see more about China’s diversification efforts in other fields too.
By now most people know how to make a debt clock.
Simple, it ticks similarly to a household clock. It comes
with a constant speed, a cycle of determined units in
dollar per day. Timelessly, showing dollar time which
has no affiliation to Greenwich association.
No standardisation, though online, it may manually reset
its constant speed – accerelate or decerelate.
Is the clock built to deceive or for alien’s time concept?
ummm, I wonder what that $25,000 will buy at that point… Even though I am one of this so called tiny gold bugs.
Pingback: plantacja lawendy
Pingback: jazda konna
Pingback: texas car title and payday loans
Pingback: kfz versicherungsvergleich
Pingback: work from home
Pingback: boost nutritional drink
Pingback: how to win the lottery guaranteed additional info
Pingback: stromanbieter vergleich
Pingback: european roulette free
Pingback: joan rivers cirugia
Pingback: Merle Dixon
Pingback: slot machine bar
Pingback: epromos logoed apparel
Pingback: plastic surgery disasters
Pingback: selena gomez gif
Pingback: giochi slot machine gratis e senza scaricare
Pingback: selma blair hot
Pingback: new launch
Pingback: weight loss
Pingback: how do you get rid of warts
Pingback: warts removal
Pingback: fat loss factor scam
Pingback: one direction
Pingback: drunk driving attorney Miami
Pingback: surgery abroad philippines
Pingback: casino bonus senza deposito
Pingback: how to open a business
Pingback: raspberry ketones
Pingback: umek at tomorrowland
Pingback: playa del carmen weather
Pingback: best app builder
Pingback: budowa remont domu
Pingback: How To Conceive A Girl
Pingback: points on driving record
Pingback: selena gomez boob job
Pingback: paintless dent repair
Pingback: pret immobilier
Pingback: Joshua A. Jacobi
Pingback: blake lively cosmetic surgery
Pingback: binary option brokers
Pingback: casino ohne einzahlung
Pingback: ĀTRIE KREDĪTI
Pingback: mamoplastia fotos
Pingback: send flowers minsk
Pingback: slot machine gratis
Pingback: visit this blog
Pingback: how to eliminate bed bugs
Pingback: Due dilligence
Pingback: Website plans pricing
One of the most heated political battles raging across the western world is debt versus austerity. In the U.S. this debate reached it's apex in 2011 when the U.S. credit rating was downgraded by Standard and Poor's. In today's essay, however, Chris Mayer throws the debate out the window, explaining why he thinks a U.S. debt crisis will never happen...
Believe it or not, more capital for a company doesn't necessarily mean better returns for investors. In fact, in a recent study that dug through data from more than 200 acquisitions going back to 2006, they found a "sweet spot" for the most likely acquisition targets. And it's lower than you think. Matthew Milner explains...
The Affordable Care Act dumped 2,000 pages of regulations into the health care sector, stifling any innovation that could have brought about real cost savings. But even with these obstacles, there are still people looking for ways to do things better and at a lower cost. These new technologies could be the key to fixing health care in America...
While many of the newer social media stocks struggle for gains this year, old-school tech stocks have become some of the best trades on the market. With the rare exception (Facebook is doing well—shares are up 26% year-to-date) the social stocks are in the gutter. They got off to a fast start in January and Februray, but ran out of steam in the spring. Aside from a few feeble attempts, few have posted anything close to a noteworthy comeback. Twitter, LinkedIn, and Groupon are all down double-digits year-to-date. Groupon—the worst performer on this short list—is down 47%. On the other had, the biggest of the big tech stocks on the market are helping traders pile up even larger gains right now. Greg Guenthner explains…
In the 1960s, total credit in the U.S. broke the one trillion dollar mark...and since then, it has expanded over 50 times. But now, as Richard Duncan explains, the explosion of credit that's made America prosperous, threatens to take the entire economy down. And that could mean the return of another depression...