 The Rude Awakening Wall Street, New York Thursday, July 28, 2005
------------------------- The Rude Awakening PRESENTS: Even though we believe the big bull market in natural resources is going to flourish for many more years, nothing goes up in a straight line. So we don't mind receiving some steady dividend income along the way. --- Advertisement ---
America's Leading the World to Financial Ruin! So says the world's greatest living economist
And after seeing the REAL numbers - the ones mainstream "analysts" never even look at - I have to say he's absolutely right. The brutal truth is that the U.S. economy is a brittle house of cards. But you don't have to blindsided when it all comes crashing down - not if you've got the facts - and the expertise to parlay them into major profits
Click here |
------------------------- IN ROYALTY WE TRUST By Justice Litle In last Tuesday's Rude Awakening, we examined BlackRock Global Energy and Resources Fund (NYSE: BGR), a unique closed-end fund that specializes in high-yielding natural resource securities. Like the managers of BGR, we also love high-yielding resource stocks, especially the type known as royalty trusts. Even though we believe the big bull market in natural resources is going to flourish for many more years, nothing goes up in a straight line. So we don't mind receiving some steady dividend income along the way. Royalty trusts, also known as income trusts, convert operating assets like pipelines or coal terminals or oil fields into utility-like vehicles that pay high dividends. The primary goal of the trust is to provide long-term income to the unit holders, rather than capital gains. To that end, income trusts distribute most of the cash flow generated by the income-producing assets they hold. There are many types of income trusts. The most well known are probably REITs (real estate investment trusts) and oil and gas trusts. There are also specialty trusts involved in many different businesses, holding a wide range of assets. The Pembina Pipeline Income Fund (Toronto: PIF-U), for example, operates oil and gas pipelines, Westshore Terminals Income Fund (Toronto: WTE-U) operates coal terminals in British Columbia, Algonquin Power Income Fund operates hydroelectric facilities in Eastern Canada and New York. Or if investing in canned sardines, fish meal and fish oil appeals to you, The Conners Bros. Income Fund (Toronto: CBF-U) provides a means of doing so. In short, there are almost as many sorts of income funds as there are industries. Investors may buy or sell income trusts just like any other stock. While income trusts can offer significant capital gains under the right circumstances, their historic attraction has been yields. On the face of it, therefore, an income trust paying out substantial yields looks like a great deal. But there are real risks to think about, and a few key points to consider carefully before investing. The first point of consideration is the long-term outlook for the underlying assets of the trust. In other words, do the assets and/or business model of the trust ensure the trust's ability to thrive at least another 10 years down the road, if not longer? Or is the payout ratio self- destructive? U.S.-based energy trusts are designed to produce until reserves run dry and then call it quits. On the other hand, Canadian energy trusts - widely known as "CanRoys," shorthand for Canadian royalty trusts - are allowed to extend the life of the trust through acquisitions or exploration. As the reserve life of current assets depletes, many CanRoys will issue additional shares to fund expansion. This activity can dilute value quickly if the new purchases are not made wisely. If production in the new areas is below previous standards, or more expensive to operate or too costly a purchase, then unit values and cash distributions are both likely to suffer. Some investors are skeptical of the energy trust business model purely because of depletion concerns. In reality, though, traditional oil and gas stocks have to deal with a similar issue. Unless their managements of Exxon, Shell and BP plan to close up shop and ride off into the sunset one day, they, too, must replenish their proven reserves over time. So the issue of depletion really comes down to current levels of reserves (how many years are left in the tank) and the ability of management to profitably replenish those reserves (through exploration or acquisition or both). Therefore, when it comes to income trusts generally - and energy trusts in particular - there are certainly a lot of concerns to address. But then again, the same story holds true for an investment in common stock or corporate bonds. Due diligence is always warranted. On the positive side, because these issues come down to quality of assets and quality of management, a well-run energy trust can be a sound investment. A quarterly or monthly dividend can provide income where many speculative E&P (exploration and production) stocks would offer none, and there is still room for upside appreciation as energy prices rise in the long term. Because of their commitment to distribution, energy trusts are not quite as volatile as E&P companies that retain all earnings (though the level of volatility for anything related to energy these days can still be significant). All else being equal, we favor the CanRoys that retain a large portion of their cash flow to fund future investment. To explain the importance of the payout ratio for income trusts, we'll turn to the Oracle of Omaha, Warren Buffett. In this excerpt from a 1984 letter to shareholders, Buffett describes the concept of "restricted earnings": "Dividend policy is often reported to shareholders, but seldom explained. A company will say something like, 'Our goal is to pay out 40-50% of earnings and to increase dividends at a rate at least equal to the rise in the CPI.' And that's it - no analysis will be supplied as to why that particular policy is best for the owners of the business. Yet allocation of capital is crucial to business and investment management. Because it is, we believe managers and owners should think hard about the circumstances under which earnings should be retained and which they should be distributed. "The first point to understand is that all earnings are not created equal. In many businesses, particularly those that have high asset/profit ratios, inflation causes some or all of the reported earnings to become ersatz. The ersatz portion - let's call these earnings "restricted" - cannot, if the business is to retain its economic position, be distributed as dividends. Were these earnings to be paid out, the business would lose ground in one or more of the following areas: its ability to maintain its unit volume of sales, its long-term competitive position, its financial strength. No matter how conservative its payout ratio, a company that consistently distributes restricted earnings is destined for oblivion unless equity capital is otherwise infused." Buffett is talking about dividend-paying stocks, rather than income trusts, but his point is highly relevant to income trusts nonetheless. In order to survive and thrive for the long term, most businesses need to reinvest a portion of the cash they generate. If all the cash is paid out to shareholders, the business will eventually weaken and die. Because they are focused on cash distribution, income trusts typically pay out anywhere from 50-90% of earnings, and sometimes more, to shareholders. There is thus real risk, as Buffett points out, of the underlying business spending itself into oblivion. If the income trust is treated as a cash cow, rather than as an ongoing concern, then the cow is in jeopardy of being milked dry. This is why an attractive yield is only the tip of the iceberg. An income trust boasting a juicy short-term return may look great at first glance, but horrible on closer inspection. If the underlying business is throwing off cash to shareholders but slowly being ground down by lack of reinvestment, returns could suffer sooner rather than later, sending the trust into a downward spiral. Given the concerns and potential pitfalls, "reaching for yield" without examining key factors could be dangerous. Come back tomorrow and I'll tell you about one of my favorite royalty trusts. [Ed. Note: Justice Litle is the editor of the widely read newsletter, Outstanding Investments. Check out three rock solid energy plays that from the letter right here: Outstanding Investment: Energy = Wealth --- Advertisement ---
The 5 Step Program You Will Need to Survive
the biggest one year loss of wealth in world history! The "Hidden Drop" in home pricing will shock owners. This 5 step program will now only show you how to PROTECT yourself, but how to actually make money during this disaster. Find out more
|
------------------------- Did You Notice
? By Eric J. Fry Natural gas looks like a buy, according to Kevin Kerr, editor of the Resource Trader Alert, at least relative to crude oil. "Even as crude heads higher," Kevin notes, "natural gas has slumped lower. The reason: Though record heat is breaking across major population centers of the country right now, official forecasts call for the heat to break soon. If that happens, the demand for natural gas should go down. But here's a question: What if the cooling breezes don't come? In fact, so much bearishness is built into the natural gas market that even a mild disappointment in the weather would burn the natural gas short-sellers."
Furthermore, as the chart above illustrates, the price of natural gas is quite low relative to the price of crude oil. No automatic connection between these two energy sources would guarantee that the gas price would move higher immediately. But on the other hand, a relatively low gas price makes for a relatively attractive entry point to buy the stuff
or to buy natural gas-related stocks.
[Ed. Note: If you haven't been properly introduced to Kevin Kerr, perhaps now is the time. Those that became acquainted with his resource market savvy earlier this year have seen impressive gains from the man they call the 'maniac' trader. Check him out here: Resource Trader Alert ------------------------- And the Markets
| Wednesday | Tuesday | This week | Year-to-Date | DOW | 10,637 | 10,579 | 31 | -1.4% | S&P | 1,237 | 1,231 | 10 | 2.1% | NASDAQ | 2,186 | 2,176 | 18 | 0.5% | 10-year Treasury | 4.26% | 4.24% | 0.03 | 0.04 | 30-year Treasury | 4.47% | 4.46% | 0.01 | -0.35 | Russell 2000 | 675 | 675 | 7 | 3.6% | Gold | $425.30 | $423.30 | $0.25 | -2.8% | Silver | $7.05 | $7.01 | -$0.05 | 3.5% | CRB | 307.10 | 306.13 | 4.67 | 8.2% | WTI NYMEX CRUDE | $59.11 | $59.20 | $1.21 | 36.0% | Yen (YEN/USD) | JPY 112.35 | JPY 112.52 | -1.42 | -9.5% | Dollar (USD/EUR) | $1.2076 | $1.2016 | 38 | 10.9% | Dollar (USD/GBP) | $1.7455 | $1.7389 | -17 | 9.0% |
|